Slashdot Mirror


Only 2 in 500 College Students Believe in IP

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "David Pogue of the New York Times has an interesting story about how fewer and fewer people believe that infringement is wrong. He mentions talks he gave back in 2005 where people were willing to believe that making backups of DVDs you own is wrong. Today, however, at his talks, he was only able to get two people out of a crowd of five hundred college students to say that downloading a movie or album is wrong. He goes on, like many before him, to bemoan the immorality of young people today, saying: 'I do know, though, that the TV, movie and record companies' problems have only just begun. Right now, the customers who can't even *see* why file sharing might be wrong are still young. But 10, 20, 30 years from now, that crowd will be *everybody*. What will happen then?'"

22 of 649 comments (clear)

  1. What do the rest believe in? by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So less than one percent believe in IP. If not Internet Protocol, which network layer protocol do they believe in?

    But seriously, there are reasons not to believe in "intellectual property" even if you do believe in copyright. For one thing, "intellectual property" confuses copyright law, patent law, and trademark law..

    1. Re:What do the rest believe in? by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They quite possibly do believe in IP. They just don't believe downloading for personal use to be immoral.

    2. Re:What do the rest believe in? by Erpo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thats right, if BSD copy and pasted all of those GPLed drivers and stripped the license and labled it BSD I wouldn't be heartbroken at all.

      Hear hear!

      I support the GPL over BSD-style licenses because I don't like the idea of Free code being used to improve proprietary software, but that's something I'm willing to live with if copyright is abolished, which is a more important goal.

    3. Re:What do the rest believe in? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [College students] just don't believe downloading for personal use to be immoral.

      Many of my friends didn't see anything unfair about heavy taxation and redistribution of wealth while they were students (and therefore paying no tax and probably claiming some sort of state funding toward their tuition expenses). In most cases, their views changed rather abruptly when they got their first real pay slip and looked at the deductions column.

      The moral of the story is that your personal morals are at least in part a product of your own experience and view of the world. Most college students have a very narrow view of the world, being young and having yet to start the main working phase of their lives, so it's not surprising that their views on ethical issues like copyright infringement come from a one-sided perspective. It is, of course, regrettable how quickly certain people who have come through the education system and started work in knowledge industries forget their first perspective in their haste to advocate their second.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:What do the rest believe in? by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The moral of the story is that your personal morals are at least in part a product of your own experience and view of the world. Most college students have a very narrow view of the world, being young and having yet to start the main working phase of their lives, so it's not surprising that their views on ethical issues like copyright infringement come from a one-sided perspective. That is a strange moral to take from it. I would see the moral as this: politics is war by other means. One supports the law that benefits oneself. The students support the laws that benefit students; the workers support laws that benefit workers; the business owners support laws that benefit owners; heirs-to-be support the reduction of death taxes; those who will not inherit support the increase of death taxes; etc..
    5. Re:What do the rest believe in? by smallpaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One supports the law that benefits oneself.

      There are many people who advocate that their own taxes be raised in order to pay for a social program they believe to be for the greater good, whether it be public education, socialized medicine, intervention in the Balkans, the fight against AIDS in Africa, amelioration of global climate change and so forth. Many super-rich people ask quite explicitly to pay more taxes. Warren Buffet is a good example.

    6. Re:What do the rest believe in? by Pentahex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Warren Buffet will never have to worry about paying the mortgage or the light bill. Sure, the Hollywood elite and super rich like George Soros can advocate higher taxes because they're economically untouchable. They have more money that anybody could spend in many lifetimes. The poor and lower middle class pay only minimal taxes. It's hard working middle class people trying to acquire wealth that are crushed by the jackboot of confiscatory taxation.

  2. The misinformation campaign has already begun! by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While copying media goes way back (remember the DAT tax or the fear that cassettes or VCRs would end the world?) before college students of today, the media conglomerates campaign against this type of crap is only really starting. With the RIAA making up its own commercials, getting laws passed by paying off lawmakers and adding so many fucking anti-infringement notices to their media that I burn DVDs just to rid myself of them.

    In 30 years we might not see what we would expect. The RIAA and MPAA has deeper pockets than the nerd crowd and they have a lot more to lose.

    No one here, or really anywhere else, could believe the RIAA would win that fucking case in Duluth and yet they did. For whatever reason there are still people out there that can be easily swayed by the bullshit that is strewn from the mouths of those douchebags.

    I fear the worst. Support those artists that support freedom of music and media before your money is used against people just like you.

    1. Re:The misinformation campaign has already begun! by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The case in Duluth was lost by an incompetent defense that tried to pull the wool over the jury's eyes. The jury saw through it and punished them for it.

    2. Re:The misinformation campaign has already begun! by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The RIAA and MPAA has deeper pockets than the nerd crowd and they have a lot more to lose.

      Exactly wrong. The RIAA and MPAA are trivially small compared to the set of people and companies that can benefit from cultural freedom. As an example, consider just the electronics manufacturers that sell devices that are used to share. And as for "a lot more to lose", the group that stands to lose the most here is humanity itself if the absurd idea manages to persist that culture can be owned and people can be excluded from it so some few can make a few more dollars.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  3. Our understanding will change... by kyc · · Score: 5, Insightful


      First everybody will believe that IP doesn't exist. Even now many people (including reasonable nerds such as we are) believe that IP does not exist in the form it struggles to exist today.

    The context of IP is changing and it has to change according to Internet rules. People think that it might seem unethical but the availability of sharing (especially when there is more than a single network node for each human being) cannot be just neglected by the trivial assumption that people should respect for IP.

    I don't believe in IP and I don't think they deserve it. Is the amount of effort they are putting to produce a song, really worth the millions of dollars they are claiming that they must make?
    No way.

    That's why they will lose. That's why they are losing every second. And at some point, they will really understand that resistance is futile.

    Internet will prevail

    --
    There's plenty of room at the bottom! Richard P. Feynmann
  4. Re:Sounds about right by samkass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes we would. (Since you didn't support your argument with any facts, I don't feel compelled to do the same.)

    Personally, I think what will happen in 10, 20, and 30 years is that these college kids will finally get real jobs and realize that when folks steal their stuff without compensation, they don't get paid. Then they'll all bemoan the next generation who will be hacking copyright protection with their newfangled brain implants.

    --
    E pluribus unum
  5. Common sense will ALWAYS prevail over LAW. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Students, nay people see Tv shows broadcast over the air as fair game. and will always feel that way. If I record lost and give that copy to a friend in Germany there is no common sense logic that can say that I am stealing it. I got it for free, the advertisers paid for that show to be aired over public airwaves, they got the benefit of it and the station did as well, when I send Hans the DiVX copy he get's to enjoy the crappy local car lot ad's and coca-cola ad's as well. (yes I'm a lazy ass and dont strip the commercials out, boo hoo that's what 30 second skip is for)

    Many feel bad a bit about downloading a pay tv only show like Dexter, but SOMEONE paid for the right to view it and record it. All the companies involved got their money.

    And that is what people see, they see all this IP crap as nothing more than a extra greedy money grab. Almost everyone sees that Comedy central pulling youtube clips as 100% greed and when people see greed they retaliate against it.

    As long as the media companies are acting insanely stupid and publically showing their insatiable greed this will not only continue but will grow in the opposite direction. If they keep it up we actually may see common folk caring about copyright to the point that they want copyright laws repealed.

    The one dark nightmare that make media company executives wake up screaming at night.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Summary? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Fewer and fewer people believing infringing is wrong" is not the same as "not believing in IP." I believe in the concepts of intellectual property, very strongly. However, the MPIA, RIAA, etc., have made fair use and reasonable pricing and distribution of profits to artists into such an absurdity, people can easily rationalize copying.

    I think most people would believe that artists and their associated support network should retain their rights to their music or other works. And if things were available at reasonable prices, with reasonable ability to archive and move to new media, then people would pay, respecting the rights of the owners.

    But $20 for a CD with one formulatic pop song that's a bit catchy, and a bunch of filler, makes rationalizing copying a lot easier than it should be.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  7. Bias by RockMFR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before anyone starts discussing the 2/500 statistic, remember that the interview method - asking an auditorium of college students to raise their hand - is not the best way to get a truthful response. The percentage of people who believe that downloading a movie/album illegally is wrong is probably much higher.

  8. Re:Here's my take: by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "But 10, 20, 30 years from now, that crowd will be *everybody*. What will happen then?'"

    They'll "grow up"/sell out like the Hippies and turn into reactionary fear freaks who will be as easily manipulated as all previous generations?

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  9. Re:Interesting question of sociology and morality by rothic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If everybody believes the world is flat, is it?

    Of course not, but that's not a completely arbitrary human concept which only exists for as long as it's supported by the population composing the society from which the concept arises.

  10. Re:Sounds about right by sethawoolley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something tells me that if someone was having sex with you or our friends wife/husband/boyfriend/girlfriend that they would be upset.

    Why? After all nothing was taken... It shouldn't be illegal, either.
  11. Re:Sounds about right by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IP is all about credit where credit is due, no more, no less. In that case there's nothing immoral about downloading content from p2p networks.
  12. Re:Sounds about right by Skiboo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I think what will happen in 10, 20, and 30 years is that these college kids will finally get real jobs and realize that when folks steal their stuff without compensation, they don't get paid.

    I realise I'm in the minority here but I'm in my late twenties and have enough disposable income to regularly buy music CD's or films on DVD. Generally if I want something in particular, I download it. Either way I never pay for it if it's from the major labels or studios. To some this is reprehensible but to me the action of giving any company associated with the RIAA money is worse.

    If the artists were getting fairly compensated then maybe I would have come around. If they hadn't lobbies so hard for all these bullshit laws then I might not have these opinions today.

    As far as I'm concerned: the artists can starve. Let this entire industry crumble. I have a sneaking suspicion that people would continue making music anyway, because it's what they love. Today a band can form, play some live gigs, press their own CD's, and still turn a profit. It might not be enough to live on if they don't get really famous, but you can make enough to recover your costs and then some. For most bands signed to the labels this never happens - they are left with a debt to pay off.

    Anyhow, my original point was that hopefully the kids of today will be just as alienated by the kinds of tactics that we're seeing that they won't grow up and get with the program. A guy can dream eh?

  13. Flower Power! by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'll be just like when, in the 1960's, most young people had a laid-back attitude towards drug use, which was illegal at the time. Now, 40 years later, those people are in power, and drug use is perfectly... uh... oh... wait. Never mind.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  14. Re:Sounds about right by AlterTick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where is it written that The point of patents and copyrights are to promote the publics best interest by creating an incentive to create new works that benefit all. ?? I think that patent law is there to protect the inventor. While "all" may benefit, this is a secondary result, sometimes. You think wrong. God almighty, it's in the fucking US Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8:

    "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

    --
    Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.