Slashdot Mirror
Anti-Virus Bug Briefly Identified Windows Explorer as Malware
SJ2000 writes "Windows Explorer was quarantined last week by Kaspersky Lab's antivirus software after being falsely identified as malicious code. The security company's systems had decided that a virus called Huhk-C was present in the explorer.exe file, leading to its confinement or, in some cases, deletion. The bug was only live in the wild for two hours, and ended up affecting just one corporate customer and a handful of home users."
Windows identified as malware... why is this a bug?
Anti-Virus Bug "Correctly" Identified Windows Explorer as Malware
Viruses are small and efficient.
The Kai's Semi-Updated Website Thingy
that's not a bug, it's a feature
Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
Shouldn't this have been caught by even the simplest test before releasing?
That's my first reaction, now I'm off to RTFA
You're right. But sometimes MS is in a hurry to get their product out.
...
Oh, you mean Kaspersky Labs
Bark less. Wag more.
The bug was only live in the wild for two hours, and ended up affecting just one corporate customer and a handful of home users.
And yet it still made the front page of Slashdot.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Any story that puts MS in a bad light or makes fun of them almost always gets the story about some guy enjoying another's feces.
I guess it's just too early still in Seattle... Maybe they will post it later.
Merry Christmas Bill!
Now, of course they should not. Never. But they do. A few years ago, McAfee found MS Excel as malware (and acted accordingly, including detention or deletion, just like Kaspersky did with explorer now).
But how? Don't they test?
Of course they do. AV developers usually have some way to test against the most common software (and a few more software packages) before issuing a new signature. Though, as you can hopefully imagine, that takes time. The "whitelist" box that contains those "known good" files contains literally gigabytes (and soon terabytes) of software. As you can imagine, it takes a LOT of time to scan it all.
Time, though, is of the essence in the malware fight. You NEED that signature out before the proverbial shit hits the fan (i.e. before your customer opens that infected spam mail that was just distributed a few billion times globally). So your sig update has to go out NOW. Preferably it should've been out an hour ago.
How do you solve that quandary?
There are a few strategies. But they all come down to one single problem: Having a current version of every file you want to whitelist. So what most likely happened is this:
MS pushed an update for the file in question, most likely another of their infamous "silent" updates. You know, the ones you don't even notice. Now, if it wasn't a "silent" one, then one should wonder whether Kaspersky was sleeping (because they didn't fit it into their whitelist box in time) or whether it was pushed JUST at that time when they committed that update. Unfortunately such coincidences do happen.
Now, I'm not working at Kaspersky. Rather, I'm working at one of their fiercest competitors. So I should probably rejoice at their blunder (and I'm fairly sure my boss will be in a GOOD mood on Thu, time to ask for a raise, I guess). But it can, did, does and will happen. To anyone in the biz. No matter how good you are and how good your false positive alarms and nets are, it can happen to everyone. If anything, this proves it. Kaspersky IS one of the key players in the business, and they usually know what they're doing.
That's one of the reasons why I do highly recommend that you set your AV tools on "ask me before any action" mode. Yes, it bugs you every now and then, but it also means that things like this won't happen to you should your AV tool manufacturer have a similar problem one day.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.