Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FBI to Put Criminals Up in Lights

Posted by samzenpus on from the billboard-busted dept.

coondoggie writes "The FBI today said it wants to install 150 digital billboards in 20 major U.S. cities in the next few weeks to show fugitive mug shots, missing people and high-priority security messages from the big bureau. The billboards will let the FBI highlight those people it is looking for the most: violent criminals, kidnap victims, missing kids, bank robbers, even terrorists, the FBI said in a release. And the billboards will be able to be updated largely in real-time — right after a crime is committed, a child is taken, or an attack is launched. Chicago, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Miami will be among those cities provided with the new billboards."

10 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. Free publicity? by five18pm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now how many want to bet that some idiot will commit a crime just to get on the billboard?

    1. Re:Free publicity? by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would, I think, require even more stupidity then normal, considering the number of ways one could achieve a similar level of publicity without the risk of going to jail for a great many years.

      Now, how long before someone hacks a billboard to show the President's face... that should be the question asked.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  2. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we do a daily minute of hate as well?

    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remember how we scoffed that politicians just don't "get" computers? I think they understand now. We'll soon wish they had remained ignorant.

    2. Re:Cool! by kalirion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this a gutshot reaction or something? Seriously, I don't see what the problem with this is. They're not planning to put up pictures of recently released criminals. They're not planning to put up pictures of sex offenders in your neighborhood. They're not planning to put up pictures telling you to vote Republican. This is to be used same way as America's Most Wanted and backs of milk cartons. At least for now. If that changes, then start complaining.

      They just have to make sure they display a context label with each photo. Wouldn't want a kidnap victim to be confused for a terrorist.

    3. Re:Cool! by eck011219 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only potential problem I see is that if they can put something up moments after a crime is committed, sooner or later you're going to end up with surveillance video of some poor slob who walked in or out of Wal-Mart right before or after an actual child molester did. Whether this will happen more or less than other forms of false accusation, we won't know until they do it.

      That's really the problem with speed and ease of use -- it's much easier to accidentally put the wrong face on a digital billboard than it is to put the wrong face on the back of a milk carton or on a poster or flier. The latter takes time and has several stages at which errors can be caught. Whether this problem is worth foregoing the advantages of it, I don't know. Probably not.

      Around here (Chicago area) we've had message boards over the highways for years -- they give traffic times, alternate routes, and occasionally are used for Amber Alerts (descriptions of cars or people suspected of child abduction). So the same concept, albeit in a non-graphic form, has been used with great success for some time. They got a kid back from a bad guy just recently using this technique. But I will say that I idly worry that I (big hairy stranger-danger-lookin' guy) in our very common (Honda Accord) car with my daughter in the back will someday experience the harsh hand of the law of averages. I guess I'd still rather have to deal with straightening out that type of confusion once in my life if it means that more actual bad guys get caught.

      Oh, and another problem is aesthetic -- the world will rapidly become a lit-up, post-apocalyptic place full of advertising and scrolling messages from the authorities. But that's kind of a matter of taste -- I think they amount of visual noise we live with is already numbing. Add more and it further reduces the impact of any given piece of it.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    4. Re:Cool! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Much as it might disturb some to acknowledge it, Mitnick was found guilty of outright fraud. That he happened to use computers to steal people's credit card money is somewhat incidental. He was caught and convicted and is in no way a hero figure. Ethical hackers will keep him at arms length, because... well, he was just another swindler.

      And now he's just a has-been trying to cash in on his name. Oh well.

    5. Re:Cool! by Original+Replica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, I don't see what the problem with this is.

      The problem is fear mongering. It immediately puts the populace in a state of mind that is submissive to the leadership. People drop into a us vs.them mindset. Criminals (or anyone accused of being a criminal) stop being thought of as real people, they simply become them. Anyone questioning the leadership must be siding with the rapists and murderers. There is already a growing divide between the common people and the government's agents (Homeland security and the police). No one feels safer when a cop is looking at them, regardless of if you have done anything wrong. The police are more and more inclined to treat citizens as "the enemy" The only way that the mass population will put up with these conditions is when they believe that it is necessary because they government is protecting us for a much greater evil.

      This is a game already played with the terrorists, but that's getting really expensive, and the military is stretched too thin. The government needs to bring the boogeyman home.

      --
      We are all just people.
  3. Its bound to work by Instine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because fame is such a big deterrent. Especially in the States

    --
    Because you can - or because you should?
  4. What a GREAT idea by puppetluva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a really good idea!

    I think it will be useful for:

    • Getting sensationalism out of the newsroom and into advertising where it belongs. (and eliminating any sense of personal or editorial responsibility when smearing someone's reputation).
    • Helping the government to use private billboard companies to irresponsibly violate the privacy of private citizens. Shifting the power once and for all away from non-profit-generating people.
    • Hyping crimes out of proportion to their real risk to society and keeping the people quaking in their boots (and consuming).
    • Finally getting rid of that pesky "innocent until proven guilty clause"
    • Punishing people who didn't give enough in campaign contributions to the party in power
    • Allowing us to effectively bundle advertising, racism, and fear (maybe even in one billboard!). Imagine how many security systems, bank accounts, insurance policies, guns and KKK memberships we could sell in bundled ad campaigns!
    • Making us look really modern. . .pushing us from the 21st centry to 1984

    I can't wait until these images can be broadcast directly into the skies above our houses. I have long thought that we don't mistrust and/or hate our fellow citizens enough in the USA. I was worried that we might drop our murder rates and/or school shootings to the levels of other countries, but it looks like we are well on our way to whipping our citizenry to new heights of paranoia and aggressiveness.