Archos 605 WiFi Hacked
Nathan Ramella writes "The ARCwelder project has released a technique dubbed 'Go Fighting Tabby!' which exploits an unquoted system() call through the Archos UI, providing the ability to execute arbitrary code with root access on the Archos 605 WiFi. In doing so, opening the platform up for further hacking. The Archos 605 WiFi runs embedded Linux on an ARM processor, but employs a variety of anti-hack techniques to keep users from modifying its firmware and operating system. Included is a cross-compiled sshd with configuration files to allow for passwordless ssh access to the Archos when it is connected to a WiFi connection. Bricks ahoy!"
What the parent said, but doubly so because, IIRC, the original Archos' were basically saved by the homebrew community, who came up with new, better, firmware for their products. It was a win-win... so why is the new stuff so anti-modder?
"Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
One reason could be windows media DRM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_(DRM)
AFAIK, if a device supports "protected windows media", they must comply to some drm security specs from microsoft. One requirement for example, is secure time (user should not be able to reset the device time or change to an earlier time), or that the rng/random seed used to generate keys is "good enough".
The sad thing is that this device uses linux, but archos is trying to "close" the system, because of a microsoft requirement.
I don't understand why companies _need_ to support drm'ed media. The Nokia N800 series is very, very open. I suppose it doesn't play drm'ed media, but who wants protected media, anyway? It can play all my mp3's, videos fine.
Decisions, decisions.
Yeah, I'm gonna have to go Nokia on this one. $299.00 n800
OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
Go to http://tinyurl.com/preview.php and (with cookies enabled for this site) click "Click here to enable previews". Et voilà - the next time you click the tinyurl, you'll be able to check were you're actually heading. It's not that difficult, is it? It also protects you from shock sites, at least in the case of a notorious full address of the site.
(Maybe a checker could be integrated into Slashdot itself - it takes but a single HTTP connection to tinyurl.com to fetch the full address and you could cache it locally and instead of [tinyurl.com] display something like [myminicity.com @ tinyurl.com] next to the link. But you can check it yourself right now, no excuses!)
Ezekiel 23:20