Slashdot Mirror


Scammers Continue to Wreak Havoc in MMO's

eldavojohn writes "We're all well aware of the scams that sometimes happen in online games like Eve Online. But despite this looking primarily like a problem with Eve Online, the MIT Technology Review brings us stories from Second Life and the very real $700,000 (USD) in Linden Dollars that has recently disappeared in what is appearing to be a classic ponzi scheme by a company named Ginko Banking. Unbelievably high interest rates coupled with some shady withdrawal limits leads to classic epic losses to investors. Eve Online was merely virtual currency but Second Life has a real monetary value associated with Linden Dollars & therefore is certain to see more and more scams pop up like this. How can Linden Labs set up a safety net to catch things like this?"

48 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. They shouldn't by Icepick_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let people be stupid.

    1. Re:They shouldn't by PowerEdge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That'd be nice and all... But in 1st life, people are losing homes for being caught up in schemes, not being "smart" about their purchases, etc. and real action is being taken to punish those who defrauded such "rubes". For some reason or other the Gov't and people in general frown on swindling.

    2. Re:They shouldn't by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have a point there. They should probably make it illegal to be stupid to cover these problems.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:They shouldn't by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "A fool and his money are soon parted."
      --Thomas Tusser

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:They shouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting


      That'd be nice and all... But in 1st life, people are losing homes for being caught up in schemes, not being "smart" about their purchases, etc. and real action is being taken to punish those who defrauded such "rubes". For some reason or other the Gov't and people in general frown on swindling.


      They are losing homes that they can't afford, never could afford, and never should have bought.

      Now, losing a home is sad and all, and the lenders are scum, villains and crooks who should be punished, but I find it hard to see folks who never could afford the home that they bought as victims.

      More like co-conspirators.

    5. Re:They shouldn't by syrinx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For some reason or other the Gov't and people in general frown on swindling.

      Unless they're the ones doing the swindle...

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    6. Re:They shouldn't by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      "For some reason or other the Gov't and people in general frown on swindling."

      Gov't has a monopoly on swindling and can't afford the competition.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:They shouldn't by PowerEdge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree 100%. Though there was definitely predatory lending and people buying on supposed "house payments" not understanding that taxes, and resets would in effect triple payments in a short couple of years. People buying said homes sometimes were expressly ignorant, or thought they could easily get out of the house when they no longer could afford it. Lots of people lost money in the 1990s and early 2000s due to VC and Media hype on xyz.com IPO. Lots of smart people lost a fortune. It happens. Due diligence is always necessary when forking over hard earned, real money. Unfortunately many people are gullible and are sold a pack of lies. Those selling the pack of lies should be prosecuted and punished. Personally, I fault the Government Schools and Parents for creating the environment we have today. People are manufactured stupid now.

    8. Re:They shouldn't by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hardly.

      If we treat this as a moral or ethical issue, we can reasonably argue that we should let people learn, the hard way, how to be responsible for their own finances, especially in an environment where the actual exposure is relatively minimal (the person they covered lost $144 in this scam, and she apparently made all that money by doing things she liked doing on Second Life anyway -- we're not talking about not being able to pay rent here).

      But it's not a moral or ethical issue -- it's a commercial issue. If Linden Labs wants to encourage people to treat Lindenbucks as real money -- and clearly, they do because otherwise they wouldn't set up an exchange rate to the real deal -- then they've got to deal with what is essentially a threat to their profitability. If they don't set up a system where it's safe to exchange money for other tangible goods (and stocks or CDs are tangible), then, in fact, people will learn to protect themselves -- by not transacting with their money and essentially putting their virtual dollars under their virtual mattresses. This is not an outcome that is ideal for Linden Labs -- which is why, regardless of ethics, morality, or "think about the children (or stupid people)!", they should do something to create some sort of reliable, authenticated commerce system that allows for these activities -- out of sheer self interest.

    9. Re:They shouldn't by rednip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let people be stupid.

      " Before the Wall Street Crash of 1929, there was little regulation of securities in the United States at the Federal level.", banking also has strict regulation. Now we find that, ('surprise') tight(er) controls on Investing/Banking in the virtual world is also needed. However, thanks to the 'containerized' nature of these virtual economies, I believe that federal regulation is not needed. Instead these communities need to consider getting some real professional advice before allowing this sort of activity. Not merely checking to see compliance with the appropriate laws, but using their experience and insights to create 'internal' regulation and a quick response to new threats. I would suggest that they actively pursue programmers from regulated field as well as legal staff.

      To survive, virtual economies like real ones, need to have the people's confidence.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    10. Re:They shouldn't by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. And while we're at it, why not let little old ladies be weak, and let the much stronger muggers take their money.

      I mean, if they deserved that money, they'd be strong enough to still have it, right?

      If the smart should be allowed to scam the stupid, why shouldn't the strong be allowed to steal from the the weak?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    11. Re:They shouldn't by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 3, Funny

      "A fool and your money are soon partners."
      --Linden Labs CEO

    12. Re:They shouldn't by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You assume a stupid person knows they're stupid or ignorant. By their very nature, the stupid and ignorant don't have the skills to self evaluate accurately.

      I'm all for personal accountability, but I have a hard time coming behind someone who made poor choices and ripping them a new one for doing something they never could have known they shouldn't do. They are kind like a special classification of victim, lets call it Aggravated assault vs. Plain old Assault. INAL, so don't kill me if my example isn't as exact as it should be.

    13. Re:They shouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But in 1st life, people are losing homes for being caught up in schemes, not being "smart" about their purchases, etc. and real action is being taken to punish those who defrauded such "rubes". For some reason or other the Gov't and people in general frown on swindling.

      Hahaha. Aside from some cases of fraud, the majority of these cases are people who normally wouldn't qualify for a regular mortgage, and were offered a subprime mortgage at a higher rate, which allowed them to purchase a home. Some of these people bought a lot more than they could afford, and the homeowners are losing their homes as a result (incidentally, the lenders also lose money in foreclosure).

      By comparison, if a bank uses reasonable, impartial criteria (like having a verifiable job, income, down payment & assets) before issuing a mortgage, then civil rights activists would be threatening to sue, saying that the lender is discriminating against minorities.

      Yes, it's very sad that these people lose their homes, but they bought much more than they could afford. Back when I wasn't making very much money during the high-tech bust of 2000, I drove a beat-up Honda Civic. No one would sympathize with me if I had bought a big BMW and couldn't keep up with the payments.

      Live within your means, and read before you sign anything.

    14. Re:They shouldn't by pionzypher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While I agree that the laws should continue to protect against fraud, there's a limit to what they can do. Example: Recently I saw a special on MSNBC about online fraud. The guy traced online scams from the victims to those in america who were helping the scammers, to the scammer himself in a country bordering nigeria. The scammer posed as some hot latina girl who looked to be in her upper twenties. He convinced this middle aged man to pick up, and re ship packages with his own time and money. This was all done with careful social engineering by playing on his emotions- he thought they were dating and she seemed vulnerable and in need of his help. When the guy was confronted, he was flabbergasted that not only was she not real but he was actively helping to steal from people. Apparently he had sent her many thousands of dollars to help with fake hospital bills on top of the shipping costs for packages.

      The guy hadn't even tried to do a basic reality check. There are a lot of people in the US who would be caught up in a scheme like that if the situation were right. Is he culpable for taking a package shipped to him and shipping it out again on his own dime, trying to help someone? Now we're sort of full circle. Do we nail this guy for what is essentially a crime of being ignorant or trusting? Do we try to educate him? His face just went blank when he learned the truth. He didn't know all this internet stuff. Just that wendy lied about loving him. How could we best prevent him from falling for a similar scam in the future?

      In the end, there has to be some effort to be informed and realistic about online transactions on a personal level. Those that can't be, should in all seriousness avoid online transactions. This is no different that investing. If you're uneducated, you really shouldn't go investing large amounts of money.

      There will always be scams that slip through the cracks. There will always be people who fall for them.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    15. Re:They shouldn't by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Informative

      The libertarian idea is the "your money will soon be our responsibility, because it will soon be our money"

      I think you might be confusing libertarian and liberal. Libertarian's and more along the line of "You got scammed? Haha. Noob. I guess you'll pay more attention next time, won't you." Conversely liberals tend to want to regulate everything (including your money) to make the world "fair".

      --
      We are all just people.
    16. Re:They shouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The guy hadn't even tried to do a basic reality check.

      They rarely do. I live in a relatively poor country, and all the time I see tourists come here and "fall in love" with a local girl. They buy furniture, rent an apartment for her, and when they go back home they keep sending money. In the mean time her real boyfriend has moved into the apartment with her and sleeping in the bed that he bought.

      Once just by chance I happened to be talking to one of these tourist "boyfriends," and told him what was happening. What a mistake. Not only did he not believe me, he actually threatened me for "telling these vicious lies."

      When the illusion is sufficiently compelling the desire to believe trumps rational thought.

    17. Re:They shouldn't by raehl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The guy hadn't even tried to do a basic reality check.

      What's his incentive?

      There are two options. His fantasy is real, or his fantasy is not real. As long as he doesn't know his fantasy isn't real, it's real to him.

      What if, for a few thousand dollars, you could believe you had a hot girlfriend who loved you, but the only catch is you have to trust that it's true? You or I may not like this idea, but there are many many people out there who would.

      If you don't believe such people exist, just stop by a church on Sunday.

    18. Re:They shouldn't by Sigismundo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take your point. But I think that there are still some similarities. In a Ponzi scheme, an investor might be promised a 20% return after 30 days, and he may very well get it, but this 20% is coming from new investors who are just paying in. In order for the system to work, there needs to be a constant stream of new investors. When the number of new investors slows, the system falls apart, and the person running the scheme disappears with the money.

      If Social Security continues to be managed as it has in the past, then in a decade or so there will be more money being paid out in the form of benefits than there will be coming in as payroll taxes. This is because there were a lot of baby boomers born after WWII, but they didn't have that many kids (number of children per family reached an all-time low in the 1970s). People are also living longer nowadays. So the system will fall apart because not enough people will be paying into the system compared to the number of people who are receiving benefits.

      I realize that Social Security is not an investment program, just a "safety net," and in general I think it's a good idea to have something like this in place. But if the current structure of Social Security does not change, then it will stop working for the same reason that a Ponzi scheme stops working.

    19. Re:They shouldn't by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What if, for a few thousand dollars, you could believe you had a hot girlfriend who loved you, but the only catch is you have to trust that it's true?"

      People do this all the time, it's called "900 numbers".

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  2. Re:EVE Online is a different monster by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's what makes Eve so fun to play for complete assholes and so not-fun to play for non-assholes.

    That game attracts more pricks than a porcupine petting zoo.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. One really obvious way by Enlarged+to+Show+Tex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't play games such as this, but it seems obvious to me that these sorts of scams are going to happen whenever there is a real dollar value associated with in-game currency. This sort of thing wouldn't happen if the makers of Second Life would remove the exchange rate between Linden dollars and USD; and even if it did happen, it wouldn't really be news.

    One more point: How can the makers of this game do this without running afoul of the banking regulations of various nations, especially if you can buy/sell Linden dollars directly from the company itself?

    1. Re:One really obvious way by nsanders · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Removing the legal exchange won't prevent it. Look at Diablo 2 and the insane rates of SOJs on eBay in the beginning. No matter what, people will scam for money because even if its not worth real money, its still worth something to someone.

    2. Re:One really obvious way by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure how much removing the exchange rate would help. For one, the exchange rate I believe is actually useful because people can purchase Linden dollars with real money, if you remove that, you've just created a black market for the exchange similar to World of Warcraft. WoW doesn't list an exchange rate, but for various economic reasons, it still has value. I can go to Ebay and pay X dollars for X amount of gold. The exchange rate isn't written in stone by Blizzard but it still exists. But maybe your point is if the rate wasn't backed by Linden then when people lose a lot of money they can't be blamed because it doesn't necessarily have real monetary value, but then Linden wouldn't be able to make money from selling Linden dollars.

  4. Re:It's a game by Chubby_C · · Score: 5, Funny
    It is a game, the game allows it so it should be fair play.

    People have to watch out for this in real life, they should watch out for it in second life

    The scammers are obviously better players

    --
    - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  5. Legality in Second Life by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are Ponzi schemes in Second Life legal? Did the 'scammers' get to keep the money?

    1. Re:Legality in Second Life by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're legal in the sense that SL has very few actual rules about player conduct and basically no enforcement of the few rules they do have. Unless you're crashing servers or spamming dicks it's pretty hard to get in trouble in SL, and even if you do it's just a temporary suspension. Even if your character were banned, the worst that would happen is you would lose whatever L$ you have not cashed out for real life bucks and would be forced to roll a new character.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  6. Wait, wait, wait... by Serenissima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, any anonymous Joe Schmoe can open a Bank in Second Life? And people are surprised when they give money to a stranger and something like this happens? Well shit, maybe I should start playing the game and create my own bank! You know you can trust me because I'm playing the same game you are! That makes us almost like kin!

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  7. ugh.. by Detaer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does second life still drum up this much publicity? Its nothing but over hyped marketing and furries looking for some sort of acceptance. If you don't talk about it, second life will disappear.

    1. Re:ugh.. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was scrolling through looking to see if someone hadn't made this sort of comment.

      If no one had, I was going to.. instead I'll throw my support behind your comment as much as I can with no mod points.

      Second Life is just.. just fucking terrible. I've seen articles about second life in all SORTS of publications, because the writers play.. and the funniest one was in a business mag, geared towards management (i can only assume middle.. blegh). Talked about all sorts of buzzwords, bunch of bullshit, you get to the end of the article and the writer included a shot of his in-game character, how nice.

      With a tiger's head.

      The shit you're forced to read when you're not-working at work and already read the 4-day old newpaper..

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  8. RuneScape vs. Real-world Trading by jeti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's an interesting article by the RuneScape development team on the problems scammers and real world traders cause for the game and about possible solutions that they are implementing:
    http://www.runescape.com/kbase/view.ws?guid=diary06

    Excerpts:
    The majority of bots that we ban from members have been paid for with stolen credit card numbers.
    Such accounts don't earn us money, they cost us money in bank refund charges.

    During 2006, we banned bot and real-world trader accounts carrying RuneScape gold and items worth over 200 billion gp. During 2007, so far, we've banned over 525 billion, which has a real-world value of over $2.6 million US - that's an increase of over 250%.

  9. If it is too good to be true... by db32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a real hard time feeling very sympathetic to most of these people being scammed. These types of scams typically rely on the victim allowing greed to shut down their brain. I am normally one to be pretty vicious towards the scammers in things like credit cards and predatory lending, because often enough it isn't exploiting greed and get rich quick schemes so much as it is a genuine fraud and manipulation. This subprime crap and scams like this are almost exclusively greed driven on the part of the victim. Listen to the radio and you will hear dozens of commercials per day on how to get rich quick in real estate, flipping houses, or whatever other genious plan being sold. I can't imagine why someone selling real estate would try to sell a system of how to get rich by buying real estate...

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  10. Parallels to real-world economies, anyone? by compumike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ginko's exchange rates only made sense if inflation was high too. The economy was being manipulated and Linden Labs was "printing" more money. But given Wikipedia's description of what happened, it appears exactly like what happened in the US not too long ago. The "government" changed a law about the legality of internet gambling, and this instantly caused the deaths of several companies. It's actually kind of interesting to watch how a virtual currency behaves and how to create an economic system even within a game like this.

    --
    Our microcontroller kit. Your gcc compiler. Learn digital electronics.

  11. Re:EVE Online is a different monster by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, Eve has real consequences for failure. It's wide-scale PvP, in a way that actually makes roleplaying make sense.

    Compared to the endless grind of City of Heroes or World of Warcraft... well, finding a way to deal with scammers in Eve is what makes it the only MMO worth playing.

  12. Re:Laws should not reward the stupid by Grygus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would argue that the entire point of civilization is to protect the weak and/or stupid. I would also argue that at various times and places, we have all been the stupid one at some point. Lastly, I would point out that in this case, the loss of virtual currency is an actual material loss, since you can convert game dollars to USD.

    People will also not improve just because you think you're better than they are.

  13. It's not a problem, it's a feature by Idaho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're all well aware of the scams that sometimes happen in online games like Eve Online. But despite this looking primarily like a problem with Eve Online [..]

    (emphasis mine)

    Uhmmmm, hello?

    Eve Online is specifically designed to have a player-driven economy and market. As in real life, it is possible to scam people in such a market. This is not just allowed in Eve online, it has in fact been close to actively encouraged (as in, people have asked devs/GM's whether it's ok to do certain things, and got a reply that amounts to "if it's not obviously prohibited by the EULA, go right ahead". It has made for some nice stories as well, some people may remember the story about the Eve Intergalactic Bank piramid scam.

    The devs consider this kind of thing to be exactly as intended and have even stated so in public forums. So yes, it's a harsh game. It is actually possible to lose the work of several months in a matter of minutes.

    Of course, there are still rules/an EULA, for example it's not OK to phish for account details, to sell or buy in-game money for real-world money, etc. However, if you manage to convince hundreds of people that they should invest in your piramid scheme, you should absolutely go right ahead.
    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    1. Re:It's not a problem, it's a feature by Breakfast+Cereal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so much "simulating real life" as it is achieving a reasonable degree of verisimilitude for a game whose setting is supposed to be a largely lawless region of space. It would be rather strange if you could engage in deadly space battles with people and kill them but the space police show up when you trick them into giving you all their space monies.

  14. Stupid should hurt by sstamps · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm an avid SL resident, and have been vocal about the Ginko subject in the SL community forums on numerous occasions.

    Basically, as many have said there and elsewhere, when you participate in one of these "banks", you give your money to someone. That's how LL sees it. You are GIVING your money to someone. Whether they give it back or not, let alone pay you any extra for the privilege, is gratis, and they have no intention of doing anything about it if the owner of bank X up and disappears with the money. ANYone can set up ATM machines anywhere and do what Ginko did. Well, they can't any more, as people have already been burned and are wary, but there are still many naive people out there who will blithely go up to an ATM, see flowery words and fabulous interest rates, and deposit every L$ in their account, never suspecting that it isn't a "real" bank.

    Yes, it is only "virtual money". Any real world value it holds is subject to change at any time. Most cases, it isn't a lot of money that is lost in these scams. It's an expensive lesson to learn, but it is far from life-breaking for anyone.

    What is kind of telling is that LL does stop pyramid schemes and other such money scams, but does nothing to stop Ponzi schemes, like Ginko's (not-so-affectionately called the "Porto-Ponzi" in the SL forums). Ponzi schemes are a variation on pyramid schemes and, if one is regulated, the other should be as well. It is left as an exercise to the reader why LL can't seem to fathom this concept and put an end to SL "banks".

    In the end, though, it is and should remain caveat emptor. In some ways, I think it is a good training ground for RL. The money involved is often nothing more than discretionary income for most folks, so losing it shouldn't hurt any more than losing it in a poker game. There's more than enough wisdom out there for people to obtain and investigate before giving their money to anyone. Whether they choose to ignore it falls squarely on their shoulders and no one else's.

    --
    -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
  15. Re:It's a game by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you mean a *voice deepens* metaverse?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  16. Re:It's a game by Tazmaster75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keep the federal oversight out of our games, please.

    You may not have had a choice in entering this world, but you certainly have a choice about playing a game. And putting real money into a game in the form of Linden Dollars is also a choice.

    --
    The glass is neither half full nor half empty. It is dirty and I don't do dishes!
  17. Virtual NSA, virtual FBI by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Already happening. From a Linden Labs press release: The company also introduced algorithms that identify suspicious activity...

    A virtual world is a total surveillance society. Everything can be logged. More than that, what you do there can be analyzed automatically.

    Big Brother is watching. Big Brother is always watching.

  18. Re:Laws should not reward the stupid by wiremind · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >I would argue that the entire point of civilization is to protect the weak and/or stupid.

    I totally disagree with that viewpoint. Do you have any reference material (books, essays) to support that viewpoint?

    I have no reference material to support my viewpoint, but having read your comment i am inclined to research this.

    My viewpoint is that civilization is a side effect of selfishness. I want to be fitter, stronger, faster. I can be more successful if i cooperate with other people. I can be even more successful if i can control other people, and have them follow my rules.

    Civilization has a track record of treating the weak and the poor very badly.

    If you are infact correct that civilization was 'designed' for the explicit 'purpose' of protecting the weak and the dumb, i would love to see the proof.

  19. No sympathy for Eve Online scam victims by misleb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I simply don't consider a crime (in the real world) to scam someone out of fake money in a game that aims to similate a large universe with a full economy and social structure. Just like there are players who will "Pod" you, there are those who will scam you. Just the way the game works. It creates a great atmosphere and drama, IMO. The Eve scams that I recall were particularly entertaining because they were so elaborate.

    That said, I'm all for IN GAME solutions to the problems like having scammers arrested or have bounties on their heads or something, but there's no need to take it to RL and make it a legal issue.

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  20. Re:So if it's a virtual life by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Currency in SL is exchangable for currency in RL, supported by the game developer. These people were scammed out of real money. It's the same thing as stealing someones chips in a casino and cashing them in.

  21. Scams are simply.... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...nature's way of telling you that you're a dumbass.

    It's financial Darwinism. And, as mentioned many times, the best cons take advantage of someone who "THINKS" that they are scamming someone else, to get something for nothing.

    If you are SO gullible, that you think the widow of a Nigerian minister will out of the blue contact you to help claim $millions in aid money, then you, sir or madam, are a dumbass. I don't care if you're a blue-haired granny who makes wonderful cookies for your grandchildren and always is willing to help someone down on their luck.

    Dumbass doesn't mean "bad", it just means stupid. And you can't legislate against stupidity. You can apparently ELECT it, but you can't legislate against it.

    The moral of this of course, is that if granny gets taken to the cleaners, then perhaps her family shouldn't have let granny so loose on the financial leash, should they? And the upshot of that? Pay attention to the people you care about. Be interested in them and their lives, in what they're doing. If they're going off the rails and you care about them, get involved.

    --
    -Styopa
  22. Re:something similar in World of Warcraft.... by C0rinthian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like this person is trying to manipulate Auctioneer averages.

  23. So maybe you are a prick? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    :D All kidding aside, while the "consequences" of EVE may be fun to you and some others the grand parent has a point. World of Warcraft has more people logged on at once than most games have total subscribers. This is not a coincidence, it is because people find it fun. One of the reasons is because WoW is a game that doesn't punish you. You can do what you want to do and not have to worry about major set backs. It is something like a single player game in which you get to save as often as you want: You may not always be able to move forwards, but you don't have to move backwards. That appeals to a whole lot of people, and they are not wrong for liking it.

    Also the grand parent does have something on the mentality of the kind of people who are drawn to a game like EVE. There are people out there whole delight in causing pain to others, and EVE is a game that allows them to do that. As such you are going to get a concentration of certain kinds of players in it, kinds of players that many might accurately call pricks.

  24. This problem has already been solved by ClubPetey · · Score: 2, Informative

    LL or CCP (makers of EVE) can stop this the same way real credit card companies find fraud. Velocity.

    Given that all monetary transactions go through a single transaction system. Those transactions can be monitored by a set of fraud rules. I'll use EVE as an example, since I play the game. Rules would be like:

    - Player donations into an account of X ISK over Y hours exceeds Z
        (probably hacked accounts feeding a central account)

    - Player donations out of account of X ISK to more than Y different players
        (probably an ISK-seller)

    - Player donations into an account from more than X players over Y hours
        (could be ponzi schemes)

    Each scam that comes up will have a pattern in monetary transactions that can be flagged using these rules. once an account is flagged, a security representative can review the specifics of the account and determine if it is potentiall fraud, and perhaps suspend the account.

    Human interaction is critical here, because the rules are not perfect. For example, the last rule would trigger for most EVE-Radio DJs that run lottos during their on-air time. A perfectly legitimate concept. That where the addition of a white list becomes useful.

    A few hours or days with an "expert" who works for a major bank would help curb these issue somewhat. The bad news is, these systems only work when installed in the core of the transaction system. Only LL/CCP can solve this problem, and they have to WANT to solve it.

    --
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes