Slashdot Mirror
Is Apple Killing Linux on the Desktop?
Domains May Disappear writes "Chris Howard has an interesting commentary at Apple Matters on recent trends in OS market share that says that while OS X has seen continual growth, from 4.21% in Jan 2006 to 7.31% in December 2007 at the same time, Linux's percentage has risen from only 0.29% to 0.63%. The reasons? 'Apple has Microsoft Office, Linux doesn't; Apple has Adobe Creative Suite, Linux doesn't; Apple has easily accessed and easy to use service and support, Linux doesn't; Apple is driven by someone who has some understanding of end-user needs, Linux is not,' says Howard. 'Early in the decade it seemed that if you wanted a Windows alternative, Linux was it. Nowadays, an Apple Mac is undoubtedly the alternative and, with its resurgence and its Intel base, a very viable one.'"
I really enjoy the Ask Slashdot questions that are yes/no.
I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I have recently upgraded from a Mac 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM to a new G5 dual 2GHz with AGP 8X and PCI-X to help me at my freelance gig where I needed to copy a 17 Meg file from my home network to a desktop folder. On the G5 it took about 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.
In addition, during this file transfer, my iPod will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this.
I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8MB of ram running MS Windows for Workgroups 3.11 is faster than this G5 dual 2GHz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.
Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.
1. The enemy of my enemy is my friend
2. Linux will get cool stores, too
3. OOO is just as good as MS Office
4. KDE 5 will look just like Aqua
5. Gimp and Adobe work alike.
No, it's not flamebait, just reality.
---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
Until you a verb, neither is your post!
At that rate, Linux will surpass the Mac's market share in 12 years, with 3161% of the market compared to Mac's 3132%. Oh, wait...
-- Alastair
In the Mac vs. Windows Commercials that apple Runs....who do you think would be a good person to represent the Linux OS?
RMS? : p
This guy's the limit!
Similarly, Linux market share has increased from 5 users to 11 users while Apple has gone up from 1,000,000 to 1,740,000.
Someone promote this guy to VP of Marketing right now! :)
UNIX/Linux Consulting
u-bend
Good for you, what do you want a fucking cookie or something?
Oh come on, it comes from a 15 year old kid called "linuxrocks123", so it must be true.
Espacially if it's a re-buttal! Ouch!
Yeah, hear hear! I just upgraded from a Kaypro 16 to a Northgate 386SX. Man, let me tell you, this baby screams! And that Wolfenstein 3D thing is just sooooo cool in 256 color VGA.
Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
Wolfenstein 3D ran too fast on my system, so I had to disengage the Turbo button.
It wasn't a coincidence that Linux came with developer tools... bought a printer? Write your own damned driver.
Most of the stuff on
stop it already, fucking fanboy! you have answered to ALL posts pretending that macs are cheaper, they AREN'T so stop whining. fuck damn it!