Science Text Attempts to Reconcile Religion and Science
terrymaster69 writes "The New York Times reports that the National Academy of Sciences has just published their third book outlining guidelines for the teaching of evolution. 'But this volume is unusual, people who worked on it say, because it is intended specifically for the lay public and because it devotes much of its space to explaining the differences between science and religion, and asserting that acceptance of evolution does not require abandoning belief in God.'"
If the National Academy of Sciences feels the urge to make such a statement, then this is another shocking sign of how far religious thinking has permeated the US of A.
I keep looking forward to the time when people proclaiming to get their commands from god have to pay the same price as people proclaiming that elvis is still alive looking like a happy man/ in the snow with Rosebud/ and King of the mountain.
Just as long as it's one of the Elder Gods of H. P. Lovecraft.
You know what they say about opinions. They're all fabulous!
I previewed that and still missed the typo! Should say:
Evolution does not have a target or a final destination. It keeps on going. Richard Dawkins is no more evolved than George Bush, who in turn is no more evolved than an earthworm.
if evolution(){ ;)
u = monkey++;
}
There are no gaps. It's dark matter all the way down.
[Some whimpering and gasping is heard among the students.]
Teacher: "Cthulhu fhtagn!"