Slashdot Mirror
High School Robotics Competition Kicks Off
DeviceGuru writes "Some 35,000 high school students from over 1500 high schools in eight countries today began competing in the annual US FIRST student robotics contest. This year's competition, dubbed FIRST Overdrive, challenges the student teams to build semi-autonomous robots that will move 40-inch diameter inflatable balls around a playing field and score the most points. In this year's game, two alliances of three teams each work collaboratively to win each round. An animated simulation of the game (in several video formats) is available online."
Why enter Robocup?
I'm sure it's a pet fave of yours, but why might it be better for high school students who don't know much about engineering in the first place?
FIRST team do a new robot every year. Makes it easier for students to get in to. FIRST has the coordination for over a thousand teams to compete in roughly 40 regional competitions. FIRST robots are barely autonomous... generally the first 15 seconds of every game has been the autonomous mode. The rest is been teleoperated. FIRST provides teams with a starting kit for each year's robot, and standardizes key components, such as the motors. This fosters a community of sharing how-to info in using and troubleshooting most of the robot.
Ultimately, FIRST robots aren't very complex (though they can be for a team with a lot of support and organization). A bipedal soccer playing autonomous robot is a lot more complex of a project that I would have been willing to jump into in high school.
I agree, but I'll say disillusioned, rather than bitter.
Last year was my first as a teacher/mentor for a Canadian team. It was a real wake-up call to go to last year's competition and see the team beside with GM logos on everything. How should high school kids be expected to compete against a team of GM-trained P.Eng mentors?
When Dean Kamen said today that "every team should have professional engineers", I realized that I didn't know what the competition was actually about. I thought we were here to teach teamwork, planning, design, and show kids their potential. It's good that FIRST wants to provide students with positive role models and a glimpse at what engineering is actually about, but unfortunately, this makes for a very two-tiered competition: some schools have a GM plant in their backyard, or they are given work space at NASA, and they do really well; some schools are lucky to have a few undergrad volunteers, scrape a few dollars together for parts and a power drill, and they get to watch the other teams show up with manicured robots.
I like that the projects are challenging, but that I wish it was assumed the students did the heavy lifting. Is it unreasonable to assume that every team will all have identical opportunities? No, but at least then the competition wouldn't be unfair by design.
Ok, rant over. My students are lucky we can participate in this competition and we're not going to quit just because our major sponsor has never put men on the moon. I wish my school had done something this amazing when I was a student.