Slashdot Mirror


Why Intel and OLPC Parted Ways

runamock writes "The New York Times has an article that sheds some light on why Intel left the OLPC board: 'A frail partnership between Intel and the One Laptop Per Child educational computing group was undone last month in part by an Intel saleswoman: She tried to persuade a Peruvian official to drop the country's commitment to buy a quarter-million of the organization's laptops in favor of Intel PCs. Intel and the group had a rocky relationship from the start in their short-lived effort to get inexpensive laptops into the hands of the world's poorest children. But the saleswoman's tactic was the final straw for Nicholas Negroponte.'"

4 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Re:No surprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bullshit. Sorry!

    I'm sick and tired of this hard-nosed extreemist capitalist view. It's bullshit, pure and simple. Take a look at what you're actually saying - competing with and screwing over a charity is really bad form. You people need to remember that capitalism is NOT PERFECT, and worshipping it's principles as if they were the most fundamental rules in the universe is really dumb.

  2. Re:The NYT headline is a bit inflammatory... by Znork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Um... that sounds a bit spun doesn't it?"

    Maybe in favour of Intel? A more accurate headline, but one that could be construed as inflammatory would be:

    Intel attempts to subvert efforts to get computers to children.

    "the Intel machines it's trying to sell will still go to the same target audience as the OLPC units"

    For about twice the price. Which means half the number of units.

    "it's not like they suddenly hate kids!"

    Well, no. They just dont like kids quite as much as they like money.

    I don't particularly dislike Intel, but in this case I must say I find their behaviour offensive. This will go on their permanent record and get weighed in for future purchases.

    "I'd love to see other devices like the EEE PC tailored towards developing nations in the near future."

    In the long run, paving the ground for this device class is without a doubt the greatest contribution of the OLPC project.

  3. Re:Intel just sucks - Agreed by coolGuyZak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One problem is that there are so few people out there like Mr. Negroponte in the business world

    In my experience, there are tons of people in the business world like Mr. Negroponte. We don't hear about them for two reasons. First, they tend to be small business owners. Second, they tend not to do heinous things. The news goes for interesting stories, which excludes the small fry doing something nice for someone else.

  4. Re:Intel just sucks. by Locutus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if you had seen and used the XO, you might be more understanding. The XO is not a threat to Intel since it is designed for primary school kids and can only help grow that market for Intel's more powerful chips BEYOND primary school. What stunned me about this article as that Peru had already decided the XO was the best device for primary school kids and asked Intel to bid on the secondary school kids device. You know, once the primary age XO users move on into secondary school, they'll need a bit more powerful( CPU, memory, etc ) device. But instead of looking at the XO as a way to start their market growth and be happy with the secondary and beyond markets, the Intel saleswoman aggressively went for what wasn't even asked for, she tried to bid on the already made primary deal.

    So even after a few instructions to Intel Classmate PC sales executives telling them to tone down the competition with the XO, a high ranking salesperson does just that? What kind of money is Microsoft putting behind this in commission fees to push someone to go so far out of her way to try and lose one contract in hopes of killing off an XO contract already made?

    Oh, you probably don't know that Microsoft is behind the Classmate PC and yes, Bill Gates has stated many times to the public and press that he thinks the XO is a terrible idea and device. Microsoft and Intel quickly through the Classmate PC out there and claimed it was a comparable product. So I would not doubt that there is probably 100's of thousands of dollars in commission behind a Classmate PC win over an XO client.

    I also hope the press and public roasts Intel for being such assholes with a non-profit organization. Business or no business, attacking non-profits can cause major brand recognition issues. When "Intel Inside" becomes a black/blue eye on a childs face, they'll think twice about this Classmate PC thing. And I hope someone gets fired for this because for one, she screwed over Intel's shareholders by losing the deal she was supposed to be bidding on.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus