Slashdot Mirror


Startup Building Floating Data Centers

1sockchuck writes "A Bay Area startup is planning to build data centers on cargo container ships, which would be docked at piers in major Internet markets. The company, known as IDS (International Data Security) says it plans to use biodiesel to power its generators and use heat from equipment to manage temperature on board the ships, reducing their reliance on grid power. IDS is telling prospects that it hopes to eventually have more than 20 floating data centers docked at ports around the U.S."

8 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Sea air and electronics are not a good mix by putaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder just how well one of Suns' "Black Box" containers will last in a salty environment. Salt air corrodes just about everything. The container is built for it, but you'd have to be careful about not opening the doors too often. Putting a data center into a naval environment, even one just rocking at a pier, is a lot more challenging then one in a building away from the shore. There's going to be a lot of cabling going onshore and that will all have to be maintained in ways that you don't have to do when there's no water involved.

    One of their founders is an ex-Navy guy so maybe they've got it all wired. However, I don't think the Navy uses off-the-shelf stuff and buying navalized equipment is a lot more expensive then the just you get at Fry's.

  2. Checking licensing documents... by Empiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ship's Register: Floating Point

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
  3. re: terrorism by ed.han · · Score: 2, Insightful

    actually, given the advent of DHS's C-TPAT program, i would bet that a dock is a lot more physically secure than you might think, to be honest.

    ed

  4. Re:Vulnerabilities and economies of scale... by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm going to reply to your post, because you made some salient points. It would do us well to remember that the US Navy has a lot of floating data centers. If anyone here thinks that those Naval war vessels are not brimming with electronics, I urge you to think again. In a barge type setup, you can create climate controlled spaces with little difficulty.

    As for redundancy, I think you are unsure of how vulnerable land based data centers are currently. Even if you bring in large circuits from competing companies, the chances that the local municipality has organized that they both run main fibers along the same railway is high. Power redundancy? Are you serious? Battery backup and generator backed UPS is all you have anyway.

    With a barge setup, your redundancy plan can be to move the whole data center to another area with fiber connections waiting to fire up. In fact, in case of a hurricane, I'd assume that would be the plan anyway. Sure, that means a 24hr downtime, unless you have redundant barges in your plan, in which case it's all a mute argument. If you think 24hr downtime is a long time, try figuring out what Californians just suffered when so many parts of a normally dry network infrastructure were sitting under 3+ feet of water. My company just suffered from that storm last weekend, so don't tell me that land based data centers are less vulnerable.

    I think it could well work out wonderfully.

  5. Port Fees? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow. This idea is completely out-of-the-box.

    I have questions:

    1. Why locate off-shore when there is plenty of space on land?

    2. Who is going to pay the port fees? Not including the tow fees necessary to periodically reposition the vessel.

    3. Why take the hit on maintenance? Periodic dry docking, corrosion management, bilge checks...

    4. Why pay additional expenses for a vessel agent? (They are NOT cheap).

    5. What about mooring? evacuations due to hurricanes? environmental impact (ballast water & bunkering)?

    6. Why take the risk associated with being in navigable water (vessel collision, dredging)?

    7. Insurance?

    8. On the subject of decommissioned cargo ships -- Most cargo ships are decommissioned only after they are in such sad shape that the operators fear that metal fatigue may jeopardize the vessel, or the safety systems have deteriorated to the point that the cost of repairs (to make them pass coast guard inspection) are too high. Why not use deep sea barges like Odysea, Crowley TMT, or Land Bridge uses? Less maintenance, and you won't have to hire three tugs to reposition the damn thing.

    Just asking...

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  6. Re:terrorism by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not after the RIAA enlists the Coast Guard.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  7. Try Earthquake protection. by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except that they appear to be researching their locations pretty carefully. San Francisco does not have hurricanes or tropical storms as the water around it is too shallow to hold all the energy. Besides, the Bay is just that: A bay. I don't know if you've ever been to SF, but pier 50 is way south well inside the bay. It is very safe.

    The land in that area is another issue. San Francisco was nearly completely leveled a couple of times in the 20th century alone by earthquakes.

    I think that the data-center on ships idea is great...

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
  8. Good response. by Descalzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That was a good post. Better than I deserved. That's what I get for being a smarty-pants.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.