Slashdot Mirror


$2500 Tata Nano Car Unveiled in India

theodp writes "After months of rumors and tantalizing leaks, Tata Motors has finally unveiled the Tata Nano, its already legendary $2,500 car that promises to change the face of not only the Indian car market, but the global auto industry. The tiny car is a four-door, five-seat hatch, powered by a 30 hp engine that gets 54 miles per gallon."

6 of 625 comments (clear)

  1. Re:30BHP and only 54MPG? by Albanach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For example, the Fiat Punto 1.3 Multijet diesel gets a combined figure of 63 miles per (British) gallon.
    But it's a diesel so you're comparing apples to oranges.

    Normally you pay extra for a diesel engine, sometimes almost as much as the $2,500 that is the entire cost of this car.
  2. Re:the VW idea lives on... by Applekid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, we're keeping Hitler's idea alive and well these days So, the idea of an affordable car for everyone is invalid because it was Hitler's, or do you have a real argument against it?

    I heard Hitler liked breakfast, too.
    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  3. Safety is relative by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be the same, but for the families that drive with 4 people on a motor scooter in India this is a vast improvement in safety.

  4. Missing the point again by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I love it when so many people so comprehensively miss the point. Guys, first visit India, then understand the problems, then you are qualified to comment (and yes, I have worked in vehicle R&D and yes, I have spent time in India)

    First, to all the Diesel supporters out there (I'm one too, currently driving my fifth one, and I keep them a long time.) The real reason that the US hardly sees European advanced Diesels, and that India can't use them, is that they don't have the refining and distribution capability to make the fuel needed by advanced car Diesels. There is a reason why my car has a 4-valve per cylinder DOHC with common rail and variable vane turbo, and my boat has the same engine with two valves per cylinder and produces one third of the horsepower. The boat will run on heating oil. The car needs low sulfur fuel with plenty of additives.

    Second, to all the "this is underpowered, this is dangerous" mob out there. The alternative is either people hanging off a scooter, or a powered tricycle with no safety features whatsoever. This thing is a huge advance. Thirty HP is plenty for India, where acceleration has to take place in the middle of slow moving traffic, and where the motorway speed limit is 60.

    Also, you may not have realised that the quoted fuel consumption of cars is on a special test cycle. American cars with their hugely over-horsepowered engines (often using a 2 litre plus engine where the Europeans would use 1300cc, and around 200HP where we would use 100) exceed the EPA consumption as soon as you put your foot down, yet most of the power can never be legally used for more than a few seconds. A limited capacity, limited power engine will in reality get better MPG simply because you cannot use it to waste fuel in rapid acceleration followed by heavy braking.

    It seems to me that what this demonstrates is that Indians are capable of thinking about what works for their society, which is their huge advantage over most of the Third World.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  5. Re:I'd buy one, too. by tthomas48 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the upside small cars like the smart car(search youtube for the smart car road test hitting a brick wall at high speed with no cabin intrusion) are made to withstand accidents exceedingly well, while SUVs are not. Anyone who's seen an SUV/compact car accident can tell you that the compact car usually looks completely destroyed, but the cabin looks intact, while the SUV is upside down with its roof collapsed in a ditch.
    The lack of maneuverability in SUVs and Trucks combined with their top heaviness, often makes what should have been a simple physics equation (heaviest guy wins) devolve into complete randomness. And unfortunately weight is not a predictor of safety once you're airborne.

  6. Re:crumple... by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you do some background reading (on your iMac, doubtless) one of the goals of this car is to provide an affordable (economically and environmentally) way of getting Indians off of motorbikes and spit-and-construction paper trikes into something that does at least have a crumple zone. Wait - you do live in India, right?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.