Slashdot Mirror


Diebold Voter Fraud Rumors in New Hampshire Primaries

Westech writes "Multiple indications of vote fraud are beginning to pop up regarding the New Hampshire primary elections. Roughly 80% of New Hampshire precincts use Diebold machines, while the remaining 20% are hand counted. A Black Box Voting contributor has compiled a chart of results from hand counted precincts vs. results from machine counted precincts. In machine counted precincts, Clinton beat Obama by almost 5%. In hand counted precincts, Obama beat Clinton by over 4%, which closely matches the scientific polls that were conducted leading up to the election. Another issue is the Republican results from Sutton precinct. The final results showed Ron Paul with 0 votes in Sutton. The next day a Ron Paul supporter came forward claiming that both she and several of her family members had voted for Ron Paul in Sutton. Black Box Voting reports that after being asked about the discrepancy Sutton officials decided that Ron Paul actually received 31 votes in Sutton, but they were left off of the tally sheet due to 'human error.'"

8 of 861 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig. by xstonedogx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dad, you're drunk again!

  2. Re:These things happen by markov_chain · · Score: 3, Funny

    They probably used Diebold's Integrated Exit Polling system.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  3. Re:These things happen by OECD · · Score: 5, Funny

    If ballots weren't secret, how would you keep people from coercing voters? How would you keep people from selling their votes? Ballots are secret for good reason.

    Oh please. This is America; nobody's going to coerce my vote. They're going to buy it, fair and square.

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  4. Someone once posted here with the following sig: by jocknerd · · Score: 3, Funny

    If voting could make a difference, it would be outlawed.

    Best signature every.

  5. Re:Very easy solution by CmdrPorno · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Either hand counted ballots, or optical scan vote counting machines."

    You mean I can just look at the candidate I want to vote for, and the retina scan vote counting machine will register my vote? What if I'm looking at the cute little blonde in the parking lot?

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  6. Re:Finally! by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been here for years, have a four digit ID, and have NEVER had one of my stories posted.

    Maybe the Slashdot submission process is powered by Diebold?

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  7. Re:These things happen by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Women are a minority?

    Ssh.. they might hear you, then we'll all be in trouble...

  8. ATM machines are more reliable, because.. by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Funny

    why is it that Diebold can make ATM machines that don't seem to get hacked
    ATM machines are inherently more reliable, due to redundancy. Suppose the "machine" fails: you still have the "M" in "ATM". Suppose the "M" fails: you still have "machine." As technology advances, things will be even better: we'll have automatic ATM machines, in which the automation is redundant. Some serious dreamers/futurists are even putting forth the idea of automated teller ATM machines. When using these machines, it is speculated that you'll have two chances to enter your PIN number before it eats your card.
    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump