Slashdot Mirror


FBI Wiretaps Canceled for Non-Payment

grassy_knoll writes "Apparently, the FBI hasn't been paying the telcos for the wiretaps they've initiated, so the telcos have canceled the wiretaps. From the AP article linked: 'Telephone companies have cut off FBI wiretaps used to eavesdrop on suspected criminals because of the bureau's repeated failures to pay phone bills on time. A Justice Department audit released Thursday blamed the lost connections on the FBI's lax oversight of money used in undercover investigations. Poor supervision of the program also allowed one agent to steal $25,000, the audit said. In at least one case, a wiretap used in a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act investigation "was halted due to untimely payment," the audit found.'"

32 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Let's get this out of the way by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nelson Muntz: Ha Ha!

    There, it's been said. Let's move on.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Let's get this out of the way by Jonesy69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I see your "ha ha"

      And raise you a "ha ha Fuckers!"

      --
      Bought the ticket, taking the ride.
  2. Oval Office Scene.... by mudetroit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dick Cheney walks into the Oval Office... "George Herbert Walker Bush! Do you see this phone bill! I guess we are just going to have to turn it off until you can afford to pay it yourself."

    1. Re:Oval Office Scene.... by parkrrrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      "George Herbert Walker Bush is my dad, you old coot!"

  3. Amnesty by kneemoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see it now, bunch of old crusty white dudes sitting around a boardroom "Well, if Congress won't get off their asses and grant us amnesty for warrant-less wiretapping we'll just have to get their attention now won't we"

    --
    My Sig Sucks
  4. I wish I considered this good news by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I hear wiretap and FBI in the same phrase, my knee jerk reaction is, especially recently, to attack the FBI. But this is awful. The US does occasionally use wiretaps for their intended purpose and, when they do, it's damned important that they be in-place and reliable. The telecoms are certainly within their rights to refuse service for non-payment, but what kind of a dysfunctional organization can't even pay their phone-bill on time? If my company's phone service was terminated, heads would roll.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    1. Re:I wish I considered this good news by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same dysfunctional organization that has abused its warrantless wiretapping power?

    2. Re:I wish I considered this good news by morbiuswilters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to wonder how many fuckups like this are never reported. Then we hear that the government can't possibly protect us when they have to follow the law.

      --
      I have come here to chew memory and kick ass... and malloc() is returning a null pointer.
    3. Re:I wish I considered this good news by gnick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No doubt. I'd like to see administrative action for screwing up the phone bill. I'd like to see arrests for warrantless wiretapping.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:I wish I considered this good news by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Dysfunctional? Try "inherently flawed".

      Poor supervision of the program also allowed one agent to steal $25,000, the audit said.


      The same people who are watching you to throw you in jail are committing grand theft themselves. Who's watching the watchers, indeed.
  5. Apparently... by uxbn_kuribo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Invading our privacy and violating the Constitution isn't nearly as profitable as one would think.

    --
    No portion of this post may be rebroadcast without the express, written consent of Major League Baseball.
    1. Re:Apparently... by JustOK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They invaded our privacy already and didn't have to pay for it. I think that's a good step toward profitability by lowering costs. Next step is an increase in regular consumer bills to offset the losses and to cover the eventual lawsuits. Result is, we pay to spy on ourselves.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  6. Recommendations by Sciros · · Score: 4, Funny
    From TFA:

    Fine's report offered 16 recommendations to improve the FBI's tracking and management of the funding system, including its telecommunication costs. The FBI has agreed to follow 11 of the suggestions but said that four "would be either unfeasible or too cost prohibitive." The recommendations were not specifically outlined in the edited version of the report. 11+4 = 15. HOLY CRAP just how bad IS the FBI at tracking numbers?? There's a whole recommendation missing there. It's probably the one that says "don't freaking steal thousands of dollars for personal use."
    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:Recommendations by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 5, Funny

      '16. Do not follow this recommendation'.

    2. Re:Recommendations by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe the missing suggestion is just still being evaluated and considered. I mean Following 11 suggestions and rejecting 4 says nothing to any that they haven't agreed to follow or rejected yet.

      It might be different if they said something more like agreed to 11 but rejected the other four. But as if now, they have only made statements about 15 of the 16 suggestions and those statements were limited in scope.

  7. Hilarious Greed by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The love of money. Source of all things evil throughout the world (that's in the Bible somewhere). And if you're in corporate America, it's also the source of all motivation.

    How much is your own privacy worth to you? Can't put a price on it, can you? But it's amazing how fast some people can come up with a dollar amount when it's someone else's privacy. I guess the same can be said about a human life--unfortunately.

    Here's something (that is hopefully) a bit enraging to think about. You may be paying taxes to your government that fund an agency to spy on you. Hell, with the NSA wiretapping, the odds are high. How do you like that business model? You're paying for someone to watch you and press charges against you if you do something wrong. What an investment!

    And this is all very patriotic of the Telcos, serving their government up until they are past due on payments. All in the name of justice and freedom, indeed! This is genuinely amazing, you just can't even make this stuff up, people.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. comment rules for stories about wiretapping: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. make sure to confuse the need to condemn bad and corrupt law enforcement with the need to condemn all law enforcement, good and bad

    2. make sure to confuse the need to question improperly obtained wiretap warrants with the need to question all wiretaps warrants, proper and improper

    there, now you are ready to flame on in misunderstanding and miscommunication on the subject of wiretapping. enjoy!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  9. Argument by omarius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another puissant argument against "warrantless wiretapping." If these investigations and programs (and agents) are so poorly supervised by the FBI, it's ludicrous to insinuate that the people ought to trust them to do the Right Thing.

  10. I thought they wiretapped out of patriotism by alextheseal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it really was patriotism that motivated they would let billing issues slide. So I guess this proves we should not give them a pass on the illegal ones since they will stop tapping for money, but not for laws which is the ultimate in contempt for law.

    1. Re:I thought they wiretapped out of patriotism by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So I guess this proves we should not give them a pass on the illegal ones since they will stop tapping for money,

      Actually, regardless of what you think about all the warrentless wiretapping stuff, why the hell are the telcos even allowed to charge for this service to begin with?

      If you believe that wiretaps (approved with due process of law) serve a purpose in criminal and/or national security investigations then how the hell can you condone the telcos charging for them? After they have received billions of dollars in tax breaks, Government assistance, laws mandating that they have the right of way to build their networks, Government granted monopolies, blah, blah, blah. After all that, they get to charge the Government money for this service? How much does it actually cost to setup a wiretap on a modern system? I'll go out on a limb and say it's probably all done from a keyboard.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  11. Heh, by Jefan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you hear me now?

  12. In Soviet Russia... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...this sort of news is what as known as "disinformation".

    So it's OK to let your guard down now because those screwups at the FBI can't manage to pay their bills on time. Sorry, but I call bullshit on that one.
    If somebody with clout thinks you need to be watched, rest assured that you are being watched.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia wiretap cancels you.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
  13. Who's watching the watchers? by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Jews.

  14. How many were rogue wiretaps? by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

    One explanation for the non-payment could be that these (or some of these) wiretaps were made without authorization, and would not have been authorized if a request had been made. Note that I am not arguing the warrant/warrantless issue, rather, I am suggesting that rogue agents within the FBI set up these wiretaps without even following whatever minimal control procedures the FBI has in place.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  15. Ah yes, human error and incompatible bureaucracies by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Human error and incompatible bureaucracies will be the two things preventing 1984 from ever truly coming true...

    Instead we'll see Brazil...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  16. Ha Ha! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Your little domestic scene is almost as funny as the bit included in the link:

    Poor supervision of the program also allowed one agent to steal $25,000, the audit said. These are the cretinoids we are entrusting with Constitutional limitation of power, and enforcing the discretion of the courts?

    The Bureau had "no comment."
    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  17. Capitalism at it's finest by bigtrike · · Score: 3, Funny

    How soon until we're required to use multiple carriers so the government can negotiate the lowest rate?

  18. Hold on a freaking minute here!! by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let me get this straight. Dubya wants us to trust him and his 'boys' to listen in on our private lives, and promises that the information will not be misused. Then they go and show us how responsible they are by 'forgetting' to pay the phone bills? Actually stealing money, and other violations of public trust.

    Is it just me, or do we need to start fixing the elections ourselves to ensure that there is a clean sweep through all of the US Government?

    Diebold has given us a way to do it, and the powers that be keep insisting that it is not possible... Maybe we should just organize it ourselves?

  19. With great power comes great need for oversight by jheath314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've never understood the current mania of increased government powers with less accountability. I'm all for increasing the powers of the spooks to spy, just so long as it is balanced by increased accountability and oversight.

    Increasing power while decreasing the oversight consistently gives bad results: at best we see this kind of sloppiness on the part of the FBI; at worst we get the kinds of abuses that have blackened America's reputation around the world.

    --
    Procrastination Man strikes again!
  20. Child porn is a trumped up boogeyman. by FatSean · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, it's like 'drugs' and 'terrorists'. I don't buy for a second that the supposed threat merits the incredible reductions in privacy and rights the current 'cure' requires.

    Life isn't precious to this government, so all this crap about 'for the children' really means 'for more governmental power'. I think of all the poor Iraqi children now dead thanks to our governments' actions and I think "American parents need to step up...they've been mooching off of the tax code forever...wI give them money so they can have the children they chose to have...why must I keep giving up freedoms for them too?!"

    I just can't get upset about US children being involved in porn, when there are children all over the world being straight up murdered. We have the blood of many many Iraqi children on our hands...let's fix that shit first.

    I'd rather be raped than dead.

    --
    Blar.
  21. The people being wiretapped weren't billed. by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It could be worse. Back when the FBI was taking down the New York Mafia, the FBI didn't pay the bill on some of their wiretaps. The billing software then billed the other party on the connection, the Mafia guys being wiretapped. It's in Guliani's book about that operation.

    Wiretaps are a billable service. See this DoJ document. Search for "Wiretap Fees" in the document. A typical 30-day wiretap costs from $250 to $2600. There are base wiretap fees, monthly maintenance fees, per switch set-up fees, additional switch fees, uninterrupted continuation fees, call-bridging fees, "pinging" fees, extension fees, and fees for activity reports. Prosecutors can't challenge the fees in civil court because the wiretap orders are sealed by a criminal court.

    90% of all wiretap requests now involve mobile phones, according to DoJ.