Slashdot Mirror


Congress To Investigate FCC

SirLurksAlot writes to let us know that Congress is planning to question the FCC on the way the commission is run. From the article: "The FCC — and Chairman Kevin Martin in particular — are in hot water with Congress... While Martin was at CES, telling all who would listen that the FCC will investigate Comcast's traffic-shaping practices, the House Energy and Commerce Committee announced a formal investigation of the FCC. The news couldn't be more welcome to the industries that the FCC regulates.'"

6 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. That's Great by zulater · · Score: 5, Funny

    One corrupt organization investigating another. What could possibly go wrong?

  2. Ads by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's good, but I'd like to see them work on fixing advertising. I'm of the opinion that we should go back to the old stance (80s or so?) that drugs shouldn't be able to be advertised on TV. I think that would help quite a bit with healthcare costs. But I'd also like them to investigate the ads we have now. I remember reading something in the last week or so that someone was pushing them to do that over the Lipitor ads with Dr. Robert Jarvik, the inventor of the artificial heart, testifying about how good Lipitor is.

    The problem is that he has never had a license to practice medicine in the US. He dropped out of a US medical school because of his grades and got his degree from a school outside this country. It's really questionable that he is qualified to talk about the drug.

    I wish they'd work on advertising. So much of it is so blatantly wrong. Just deal with a few of the worst offenders, and the rest will self-correct before they get investigated.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  3. Re:Cash Cow Concerns by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Half the article was talking about the cable and telephone companies being pissed at the FCC for bitchslapping them (from cable ownership rules and 700MHz auction rules)

    Hey, I'm all for consumer protection laws and regulation, but with regards to the cable ownership rules I fail to see how they help me.

    My understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) of the issue at hand is that the FCC wants to limit cable ownership to a percentage of the population, i.e: nobody can own more then 40% of the cable subscribers in the United States.

    That's all well and good in theory, but how the hell does it help me? That regulation isn't going to magically encourage another cable company to set up shop in my Time Warner dominated area. As long as the cable companies have local monopolies I'm sure they will see no reason not to continue to raise prices and screw their customers.

    More meaningful reform would be to separate the physical layer from the service. One neutral not-for-profit entity owns the fiber/copper/coax and leases it to whomever is interested in providing service. It will never happen but I'm at a loss for how else you'd encourage local competition for the last mile, at least with regards to non-wireless technology.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. Wait a minute... by cruzerld · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of the things that the Congressmen are investigating in the article seem to be the only good things the FCC has done...

    1) Regulating the Cable industry (ok, that's a bad one if it falls under censorship. But they do have the power to force a la carte services, which would be a good thing for most people).
    2) Putting conditions on the 700Mhz auction (which is a good thing overall)
    3) Net neutrality (The FCC is actually for net neutrality, to the detriment of internet providers).

    So 2/3 are clearly meant to help consumers, and the other one could help consumers (although it is just as likely to harm us).

    So once again it looks like the industry paid off the right Congressmen to shake down a government commission just before it actually did something right.

  5. Re:Cash Cow Concerns by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The message of the last 10-15 years seems to be "consume, consume, consume".


    Then don't buy things (as someone below your comment has said) if you don't need them. Or, you might be interested in trying what these folks set out to do.

    I won't say I've gone anywhere near as far as these folks have done (I just picked up three Calphalon pans which were at least 50% off regular price as replacements), but as a rule, I don't buy something unless I absolutely need it. Cell phone? Don't have. Newest, latest, blingiest PC? Nope. 18 different electronic devices? Nada.

    It's amazing how much money people can accumulate if they exercise a bit of self-control. I mean supposedly we're the smartest animals on this ball of rock, dirt and water. How about we use some of that intelligence.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  6. Re:Cash Cow Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you only want to live a free life, and enjoy the things nature gives you, Anarchy is perfect.

    ...until somebody else's "free life" comes at the expense of your own wellbeing. Then you're fucked.