Old Stars Can Form New Planets
Smivs writes "Evidence is emerging that some old stars may develop a second set of planets long after this would normally be expected. A BBC article explains how astronomers believe the stars once had orbiting companions, but that these were engulfed when the stars expanded. This caused matter to be ejected from the stars, forming a disc of dust and gas from which planets could form anew. The two stars described in the latest study, BP Piscium and Tycho 4144 329 2, possess many signatures characteristic of stellar youngsters. However strong evidence exists that these stars are, in fact, very old."
but that these were engulfed when the stars expanded. This caused matter to be ejected from the stars, forming a disc of dust and gas from which planets could form anew.
I'm going to quit recycling, in a few billion years Sol will do it for me.
Trolling is a art,
Since Cosby is a REALLY old star, I'm sure he'll be welcomed at planet Hollywood. *rimshot* I'll be here all week!
The sun could belch or burp out matter because of an internal explosion or an impact.
Also one solar system could use a nearby system as a toxic waste dump. Think of all the junk leftover after making a ring world system.
Finally small twin black holes could pull matter out of a sun that they orbit.
Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
Am I the only person who is not surprised that planets might form from a planetary nebula?
Of course, there is the counter example of Rosie O'Donnell, I think she does have a moon orbiting her.
Or did you mean "stars" like in "nebulae"?
John
it's not just old couples who can be surprised with a late-life batch of kids. (No South Korea jokes, plz)
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
Rosie O'Donnell could probably form several.
I must have missed the memo....today is apparently Astrology Day according to all the /. articles... I just wanna know when are we going to have Show and Tell? Thats something I might actually be good at...
We're in college now. There's girls here. They do stuff....
Well, stars do 'consume' lighter elements only to convert them into heavy (less fusable) elements that are basically waste as far as that process goes. As it happens, planets are made up of these heavy elements, so yea, that's acutally pretty accurate.
How many star bits do we need to feed these stars before they TRANSFORM into planets? :)
Ignore the rantings above. Poster is an idiot.