Slashdot Mirror
XKCD Inadvertently Causes Googlebomb
MrCopilot writes "As I noted yesterday (and was joined by many others)... in an offhand observation xkcd has singlehandedly changed a small section of the Internet. Changing the results from a Google search for "Died in a Blogging Accident" from 2 to (at this writing) over 7,170 in a little more than 24 hours." If you aren't reading xkcd, you're missing out.
You probably change Google's result for "Died in a Blogging Accident" more than xkcd did.
Yes! What are you, some kind of heathen?
Heresy. Anything related to one of the sites which are lucky enough to earn their own link on the main page of /. is always /.-worthy.
;)
Also, the concept that observing any property of the internet within the internet can affect that property is interesting. If the choice is between reflecting on that or finishing that bloody piece of code I'm writing, I'll take the former, even if it may ultimately be pointless
Considering that many people around the world have been prosecuted for their blogs, imprisoned, tortured and maybe even killed, it is not just humor, its a terrifying fact.
I've never been a proponent of medical marijuana, but somebody needs to get this guy some weed, STAT.
You might want to look into the meaning of this "accident" word.
A Googlebomb is when a page becomes associated with an unfitting search term which doesn't appear on the page itself. This effect is caused when many website authors place misnamed links to that page, usually in an intentional and coordinated manner.
I've read every TFA link in the post, but I'm not sure I understand what is going on.
1. What is the true definition of a Google Bomb? Are we confusing this with Google Washing?
2. Why is this incident a Google Bomb?
3. What makes this particular incident Slashdot newsworthy?
I think this might be a funny scenario -- but I don't get it!? Thanks for the info.
Also, the concept that observing any property of the internet within the internet can affect that property is interesting.
No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!
Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
That's not how it works. When Google recognizes a link farm, it discounts the effect of these links. The result is that the link farm no longer contributes positively to the page rank of the target page, but it does not penalize the target page beyond that. Google has punished sites for shady search engine optimization, but in those cases the sites had always used on-site techniques which could not have been performed by an outsider. Anyway, if that spamming technique could kick other sites out of the Google index, it would be called a "Joe job" (in analogy to the false flag email attack.)
A Google bomb is when many people link to a page and use the same unfitting link text, and then the target page moves UP in the rankings for that particular search term.
Google will actually let you search for Died in a * accident. If you do so you can see what words people put in there. Right now the fourth result is actually "Died in a blogging accident" (right after three car accidents). I have used that to find out what might be the missing word in other sentences like Grab your * and double click or Either you are with us or you are with the *. Even more interesting if combined with the - operator to filter out the obvious possibilities.
Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
No, you're confusing the Uncertainty Principle with the Observer Effect.
"The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is also frequently confused with the "observer effect". The uncertainty principle actually describes how precisely we may measure the position and momentum of a particle at the same time -- if we increase the precision in measuring one quantity, we are forced to lose precision in measuring the other. Thus, the uncertainty principle deals with measurement, and not observation. The idea that the Uncertainty Principle is caused by disturbance (and hence by observation) is not considered to be valid by some, although it was extant in the early years of quantum mechanics, and is often repeated in popular treatments."
Apology to Ubuntu forum.
No, I am afraid it is two now.
There is no sig.
Insightful and funny are really the same thing, except one has a punch line.