Slashdot Mirror


US Policy Would Allow Government Access to Any Email

An anonymous reader writes "National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell is currently helping to draft a new Cyber-Security Policy that could make the debate over warrantless wiretaps seem like a petty squabble. The new policy would allow the government to access to the content of any email, file transfer, or web search."

11 of 516 comments (clear)

  1. Luddite revolution by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess we'll just have to do this the old-fashioned way. Now accepting (paper) applications for the next Paul Revere.

  2. Re:Really? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

    And what is it going to do about my encryption keys?

    Well, considering that you live your life with such privacy paranoia that you feel you have to post AC and therefore probably aren't much threat to the government ... probably nothing.

  3. Make your voice heard by cohomology · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell the highest levels of the intelligence community what you think about this idea by picking up a phone and calling any number.

    I know, it's not original.

    --
    Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
  4. Re:And what about foreign nation TLD's? by nuzak · · Score: 4, Funny

    > We'll see what our governments have to say about that.

    Something along the lines of "More! More! Harder! Deeper!" is my guess.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  5. Re:You can't let the terrorists win by chuckymonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    As this applies to regular mail, I think that it applies to email as well despite the government not getting a cut of the money.

    No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Self Explanatory, encrypt. Also as the beginning states they cannot do anything to you unless they bring you before a Grand Jury. The wording is clear that the only exception are members of the Military. Which brings me to a fun story.

    When I was in the Army deployed to Iraq they told us that they had to scan our computers before we left to look for secrets and obscene material. Well this made me very angry so first I offered my services to a few friends and setup truecrypt volumes for them. Then I took a picture of myself flipping off a camera, labeled them things like Fuck Me hard(several different variations on that theme) and distributed 30,000 copies all over my hdd. Let's just say that when they put in the scanning disk the person performing the scan got really tired of seeing me flip him off and they didn't find anything. I know it was petty and he really wasn't doing it because he wanted to, but I think that I made a point even if it was in a very small way. The leadership never ever scanned anything of mine again.

    --
    "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  6. Re:Diminishing returns by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, at least the government would get lots of instruction on how to make its pecker bigger. And considering what it's already doing to us, that's not a very good thing.

    rj

  7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    your password -which is something absolutly neutral Not necessarily. My password is "I'm planning a massive attack on U.S. soil."
  8. Or You Could Go With the Reagan/Bush/Rove/Cheney by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 5, Funny

    Defense...

    "I don't recall"

  9. Re:127 hours? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

    nah, i haven't been to rotten.com or cia.gov in a while.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  10. Re:Really? by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Funny

    For instance you can moisten a hair or thread then stick it on a door placing it so that it sticks to both the door and the molding. If while you're away the door is opened the "seal" will fail and you can spot it.

    Personally, I prefer my homemade claymores for that purpose.

    Bloodstains are much easier to spot when I get home. ;)

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  11. Re:Really? by mike2R · · Score: 3, Funny

    While British prisons are no doubt dangerous places, the explicit enjoyment of locking someone up in the hope that they will be anally raped is a uniquely American phenomenon.

    --
    This sig all sigs devours