Slashdot Mirror


What is Fair Use in the Digital Age?

Hugh Pickens writes "General counsel for NBC Rick Cotton and Tim Wu, professor at Columbia Law school, continue their debate about copyright issues and technology on Saul Hansell's blog at the New York Times discussing Fair Use of commercial music and video as the raw materials for new creations. Cotton says that content protection on the broadband internet is really not a debate about fair use The fact that users can 'take three or four movies and splice together their favorite action scenes and post them online does not mean that these uses are fair. There needs to be something more — something that truly injects some degree of original contribution from the maker other than just the assembly of unchanged copies of different copyrighted works.' Wu's position is that 'it is time to recognize a simpler principle for fair use: work that adds to the value of the original, as opposed to substituting for the original, is fair use. This simple concept would bring much clarity to the problems of secondary authorship on the web.' This is a continuation of the previous discussion on copy protection."

1 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fair use is very simple by MasterC · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...i should be able to exchange my license to use this music with anyone else for a swap or money exactly like any other 2nd hand market.
    Don't confuse fair-use with first-sale.

    First-sale is really quite natural. Copyrights are placed on a non-scarce resource to make them scarce. It would be absolutely ludicrous to purchase a shovel and not be able to sell it for whatever someone else is willing to pay for it. If copyright wants to push IP to equal footing (no pun intended) of shovels then you should be able to sell your iTune or CD for whatever anyone is willing to pay.

    The illusion that you can't/shouldn't/must not resell it is Big Media (TM) overencroaching on your rights. Fair use is but only one victim of DRM and first-sale is another.

    I could make a similar argument against software that can be licensed only once (Steam: I'm looking at you!). MS products are another example of this.
    --
    :wq