Slashdot Mirror


Corkscrew Cups Could Keep Space Drinks Flowing

holy_calamity writes "A Canadian chemical engineer has a novel solution to containing liquids in space. He has been experimenting with corkscrews of ribbon-like material that keep liquids suspended in their center while in microgravity. This effect is caused by the surface tension of the liquids. The helical containers allow the fluid to be sucked out of the coil in one go. In more conventional shapes, such as coffee cups, interaction between the container and the liquid's internal pressure makes the beverage break into annoying globules you have to chase with a straw."

9 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. How to reliably contain ANYTHING in space: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Well, step aside my friend
    I've been doing it for years
    I say, sit on down, open your eyes
    And open up your ears

    Say
    Put a tree in your butt
    Put a bumblebee in your butt
    Put a clock in your butt
    Put a big rock in your butt
    Put some fleas in your butt
    Start to sneeze in your butt
    Put a tin can in your butt
    Put a little tiny man in your butt
    Put a light in your butt
    Make it bright in your butt
    Put a TV in your butt
    Put me in your butt
    Everybody say

    I, hey, that's, man, I ain't putting no trees in nobody's butt,
    no bees in nobody's butt, putting nothing--
    You must be out your mind, man,
    y'all get paid for doing this?
    Cause y'all gotta get some kind of money
    Cause this don't sound like the kind of--
    I'd rather golf, to be perfectly honest,
    than put somethin in somebody's butt
    to be truthful

    Well step aside my friend and let me
    show you how you do it
    When big bad E just rock rock to it

    Put a metal case in your butt
    Put her face in your butt
    Put a frown in your butt
    Put a clown in your butt
    Sit on down in your butt
    Put a boat in your butt
    Put a moat in your butt
    Put a mink coat in your butt
    Put everything in your butt
    Just start to sing about your butt
    Feels real good

    1. Re:How to reliably contain ANYTHING in space: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I knew a kid who would put vegetables in his butt.

    2. Re:How to reliably contain ANYTHING in space: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I bet it felt real good

    3. Re:How to reliably contain ANYTHING in space: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      How did you get out?

    4. Re:How to reliably contain ANYTHING in space: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The butt store called. They want their asshole back.

  2. News for nerds? by rock217 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Screw that.

    --
    Wah Sig!
  3. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It also raises the question: Could two girls simultaneously use such a cup?

  4. Re:Star bucks by Frogbert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Okay, perhaps it is just an American thing, but it has to be said.

    How the hell can you drink that crap? Starbucks coffee is terrible, and I'm not talking tastes-no-better-then-instant terrible, I'm talking this-coffee-is-burnt terrible.

    How is Starbucks still in business?

  5. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by SilentOneNCW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    '"Begging the question" is a form of logical fallacy in which an argument is assumed to be true without evidence other than the argument itself. When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.

    A simple example would be "I think he is unattractive because he is ugly." The adjective "ugly" does not explain why the subject is "unattractive" -- they virtually amount to the same subjective meaning, and the proof is merely a restatement of the premise. The sentence has begged the question.

    To beg the question does not mean "to raise the question." (e.g. "It begs the question, why is he so dumb?") This is a common error of usage made by those who mistake the word "question" in the phrase to refer to a literal question. Sadly, the error has grown more and more ubiquitous with time, such that even journalists, advertisers, and major mass media entities have fallen prey to "BTQ Abuse."

    While descriptivists and other such laissez-faire linguists are content to allow the misconception to fall into the vernacular, it cannot be denied that logic and philosophy stand to lose an important conceptual label should the meaning of BTQ become diluted to the point that we must constantly distinguish between the traditional usage and the erroneous "modern" usage. This is why we fight.'

    http://begthequestion.info/