Slashdot Mirror


Corporate Email Etiquette - Dead or Alive?

mbravo writes "I work in a largish company, heavily into IT, and in a complex and quickly changing market. Employees are predominantly in the 30 or younger age-bracket, and as you might expect we rely on a lot of internal e-mail. Despite that, lately I'm finding myself increasingly frustrated by a complete lack of e-mail etiquette in the company. A typical thread might look like a hundred-message-long chain of one-line replies, with full quoting and hundreds of recipients in the 'To:' field. It feels like it is happening more and more often. I don't seem to be seeing much success in explaining to my co-workers what the problem is here. How do you deal with this at your place of business, and does your company care? Does the company take any policing or educating measures?"

21 of 504 comments (clear)

  1. My experience by soulsteal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My experience in the defense industry has shown me that long, full-quote e-mails are often useful for defending yourself against another's incompetence.

    1. Re:My experience by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I tell my boss to send me specs/todos and so on in email because that's where I keep track of them, and cross em off as they're done. Otherwise it's in one ear and out the other. Not always about CYA.

      --
      Software patents delenda est.
    2. Re:My experience by sholden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And how is that a bad thing?

      Planning, etc is much better done by talking or even by IM, but people manage to come away with different impressions on what was agreed on, so a written note removes that ambiguity. Which seems a good thing.

      I like to get things in writing (either an email, or a bug tracking/project tracking database entry) when I'm tasked with something. Both for the lack of ambiguity and for the self interested reasons of it providing a record of why I'm behind on other things (you had me do this first) and for CYA (record X was deleted because you said to do so in Y).

      Email makes that such records very easy. I've worked with someone who would tell you to do X, and then a week later disavow all knowledge of ever having done so when it turns out X wasn't actually such a great idea - a cheap, fast written record is a wonderful thing.

  2. The problem by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't seem to be seeing much success in explaining to my co-workers what the problem is here.

    Perhaps there is no problem... Or maybe you are the problem...

  3. Beware of Litigation! by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I encourage everyone to be wary when writing e-mails. If your firm ever gets sued, all that becomes discoverable, and attorneys have to read through all your e-mails and documents to look for interesting things. Avoid long threads and stick with short, clear e-mails. Lots of one-liners leads to situations where a vague line looks incriminating when taken out of context.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    1. Re:Beware of Litigation! by Vicarius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would rather have a long chain of evidence that protects me personally, so when the shit hits the fan and ligitation starts, I have something to prove that it did not happen due to my incompetence.

  4. Different tool by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like what you really need is a company IM server. Install a Jabber server and client for the company LAN and you'll probably have a lot less 1 line e-mails as it's just easier to handle that sort of thing over e-mail. They're using e-mail as something it isn't designed for because they don't have anything better. If that doesn't fix it, I guess you could always LART a few key personnel. Maybe you could put a filter on the e-mail server that rejects any message less than 100 characters (non-quoted) and just tell everyone it's a new spam filter.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:Different tool by sobachatina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly, people are using email because that is all they have.

      I work in a fairly large group and we have several methods of communication:

      IM- for talking to one person right now.
      Email- for messages- Or conversations of a very temporary nature- like "where should we go for lunch"
      PHPBB- for almost all question/answer type communication. This is extremely helpful because the experienced architects and build team can give advice or answer questions just once.
      Wiki- For internal documentation and build instructions.

      Since we setup the wiki and BB our email traffic has been drastically reduced. The only emails to the entire group that I see anymore are to welcome new people and announce donuts.

  5. And your point is? by phaze3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Email is a tool. The job of IT is to support that tool and help people use that tool effectively. If you think employees are using IT non-optimally because of lack of training, arrange training. If employees of the company think these one line emails are the best use of the technology even after you've trained them effectively, let them get on with it.

    If your problem is that your mail server can't handle all these mails, it's time to upgrade the mail server and/or switch to different software.

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  6. Part of the problem by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Part of the problem is that there are two distinct ways people commonly do quotations in email. The quick and lazy way is to just hit reply, quoting the sender's entire message below, and write your reply above. The more precise way is to quote specific lines from the original message and write your reply below each set of lines. What I really hate is when the two methods get mixed. For example, I use the more precise method to reply to a message and the someone else quotes the whole thing with their reply above, the message goes through another round or two of replies and then gets forwarded on to someone else who was not one of the original recipients. Good luck figuring out the track of the conversation.

  7. Stop using email for all electronic communications by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds like you're using email when you should be using another, or several different technologies.

    Look into putting up an IM server, a wiki, blogs, online discussion groups, etc. Email is poorly suited to the kind of long-running threads you're talking about. One size does NOT fit all.

    --
    AccountKiller
  8. E-mail Conversations by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My problem is e-mail conversations, with 20 e-mails going back and forth. Cause I'm a manager, people think they have to include me in on the conversation so I can "stay in the loop".

    People, have your conversation, come to some conclusions, and e-mail me a brief summary.

    1. Re:E-mail Conversations by nullCRC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, when the shit hits the fan, a manager like you is the first one to say "Why wasn't I kept in the loop on this?", and then look for someone to blame it on, so you don't look incompetent because you were too busy fapping in your office.

      --
      Vescere bracis meis.
  9. Re:With gmail by edmicman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So where's the "Gmail" style conversations in standard desktop clients? I use Thunderbird at work, alongside some users with Outlook. I've got threading turned on for Thunderbird but compared to Gmail's implementation it, in a word, sucks.

  10. Disable "Reply to All" by redelm · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... that's all it takes [plus limited access to distro lists]. Yes, it's is a PITA for some cases, but to curb abule, the innocent usually suffer.


    Trimming the top-posting is slightly less important-- people just delete the previous messages to have a nice archive. That is, if someone didn't trim early!

  11. Dead by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Email etiquette is dead. Has been for years. Some things I've noticed which contributed to its decline:

    • People putting everyone in the "To" line which means that Outlook highlights that email in a different colour (according to my setup) because it's assumed that I'm being asked for something.
    • Putting two John's in the "to:" line and then addressing the email to "John". Which one?
    • Microsoft Outlook which positively encourages people to top quote.
    • People using the excuse that being on a Blackberry means that they can not use any punctuation or capitalisation.
    • Inserting large graphical images as the signature. I saw one of an animated Betty Boop. WTF?
    • Using the stationary functionality to give me a mock background image of a paper pad. Why?
    • Use of Comic Sans as a font.
    • Sending out messages with high priority set on a far too regular basis. High priority is for just that, if you use it all the time then it loses its meaning.

    There is probably more but I can't think of them right now. The main problem is that no-one is taught any etiquette and (as they've never used UNIX or posted in news forums) they haven't had any kind of etiquette forced on them by an application or verbally beaten into them by some irate news group member.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  12. Re:i don't get it by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has nothing to do with drive space or CPU cycles. It has everything to do with the fact that people receive dozens or hundreds of emails a day which are irrelevant and waste their time. Too many lazy people hit Reply All when the only person who cares is the original sender. The worst is when, say, a person emails with: 'Will the person with the green Hyundai please come to my office?' and my inbox gets flooded with dozens of messages all expressing variants of: 'Nope! I don't drive a Hyundai!' A lot of it is common sense, which isn't that common.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  13. Re:It's also a cause of the problem described by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and what causes that?

    well if your like me you can't remember 90% of what was said over the phone, but it's real easy to look it up if someones sent you an email.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  14. Re:It's also a cause of the problem described by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually I think what causes it is people unwilling to pick up a phone or just go and speak to the person if they're in the same office. As you point out email isn't really for chatting, so when people use it for such it can get messy.

    Phones and instant messaging interrupt the recipient. Sending out a "Drinks at XYZ tonight?" email to five coworkers is not worth disrupting five people with phone calls who could otherwise check their email on their own schedules.

    Using a phone when it is not necessary is even worse in many cases.

  15. Re:What's the problem? by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Convincing them there's a legitimate problem, aside from your ideal form of etiquette, ought to be step one. Otherwise - why would random_employee_002 do anything different?

    It's not 'his' ideal form of etiquette - it used to be quite common and well understood.
  16. Re:It's also a cause of the problem described by 7-Vodka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is easy, write down what you think he said over the phone then send him an email which says: Is this what you want me to do?
    Just keep the meeting minutes yourself and get him to sign off on them.

    --

    Liberty.