IE8 May Not Pass the Acid2 Test After All
dotne writes "CNET has published an article called Acid2, Acid3 and the power of default. The article predicts that IE8 will not pass the Acid2 test after all: '[Another] scenario could be that Microsoft requires Web pages to change the default settings by flagging that they really, really want to be rendered correctly. Web pages already have a way to say this (called doctype switching, which is supported by all browsers), but Microsoft has all but announced that IE8 will support yet another scheme. If the company decides to implement the new scheme, the Acid2 test — and all the other pages that use doctype switching — will not be rendered correctly.' Microsoft's IE8 render modes have been discussed here previously, and they've caused an uproar in the web development community. According to the scheme, authors must put Microsoft-specific <meta> tags into their pages in order for them to be rendered correctly. I doubt Acid2, nor Acid3 will have Microsoft extensions in them."
shout "SURPRISE!" in unison.
News at 11.
Have gnu, will travel.
Therefore, if you are against Microsoft, you must be a terrorist.
Please report yourself to the nearest detention center for correction.
IE8 appears to be basic...
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
1995 called, they want their and tags back
Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
"We love standards! We are responsible for releasing more new standards than anybody else! Hell, every release and patch we produce introduces several new standards..."
If I can make IE, Firefox, and Safari render the same by including a meta tag, that's such a vast improvement to the current order, I'm not going to complain.
Ah, to be that young and naive again!
I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
I have seen the Acid2 smiley face, and no one's going to want that on their webpage, so what's the difference? Whoever came up with that test is stupid, because there's no way you are going to convince even 50% of the website owners to put a stupid happy face on their website.