Slashdot Mirror


ICANN Writes US Government Requesting Independence

Combat Wombat writes with word that IP address and domain name overseer ICANN has put in a request to the US government, asking to be freed from ties to the United States. A 'lengthy' report was sent to the US Dept. of Commerce, and covers the numerous steps the organization has already completed along the road to independence. The BBC reports that a meeting will be held soon in response to the report, a reaction to the expected end of US control. "The meeting marks the half-way point for the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) under which ICANN was tasked to comply with a series of 'responsibilities' deemed necessary for its release from official oversight. The JPA grew out of the original Memorandum of Understanding that established Icann and signalled the beginning of the end for US control."

7 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Won't happen. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As much as it might be good for the Internet, it will never happen. ICANN is considered a strategic U.S. asset. Everyone seems to be forgetting that the Internet started out as a project of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The government is not going to give up control that easily.

  2. Re:From the Office of His Imperial Majesty by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya know, as easy as it is to take potshots at Dubya, I think you've largely missed a legitimate concern.

    So ICANN wants to be released from oversight by the United States. Great. I bet that makes a lot of people around here happy. What's it going to be replaced with exactly? Do you really want an ICANN without any oversight?

    Say what you will about the United States and the current arrangement, but at least at the end of the day ICANN is responsible to SOMEONE. That 'someone' is in turn responsible to 300,000,000 Americans. While 300,000,000 != the whole population of Earth, it's a hellva lot better then ICANN being responsible to no one in my book.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  3. Re:And it's time to CANN .mil and .gov by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless the United States is trying to be the Ruler of the World it's time to move to .mil.us and .gov.us like everyone else.

    Yes, because in the grand scheme of things with everything that's going on in the World, ranging from the War in Iraq to the Genocide in Darfur, the fact that the United States has global TLDs not ending in .us is really a priority that the World community needs to address.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  4. I hope you're all happy by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    With all this time spent arguing about who should control the Internet and how everybody hates the US and how everybody loves the US and how the UN is corrupt and how the UN is not corrupt and how everyone except you is a communist and nobody's a communist and China is a big country and Europeans eat French food and Kim Jong Il wants to use the Internet to enslave all of mankind with sharks and laser beams; not once, not even one single time did anyone stop and ask ICANN what they wanted.

    Shame on you all!

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  5. Re:You mean.. like the United Nations? by KutuluWare · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody put a gun to the head of the teenagers of the World and made them listen to Britney Spears, wear blue jeans and drink Starbucks coffee. For whatever reason American culture seems to be popular in parts of the World. I fail to see why we should apologize for that.


    Well, if you won't, then please allow ME to personally apologize to the world for Britney Spears.

    --K
  6. Re:Lol : "some international" or "country neutral" by readin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    U. N. is "international" but it is hardly "country neutral". Just ask anybody from Taiwan.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  7. Re:From the Office of His Imperial Majesty by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can it do anything about the US government and the telcos working hand in hand to wiretap the shit out of the internet

    Exactly what would you have ICANN do about this? It's the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. It's most important role is to manage the dns root and address allocations in such a way that the end users don't conflict with each other.

    What exactly is ICANN to do if AT&T decides to let the NSA splice into some fiber? Are you going to blame the ITU for wiretapping of the POTS network? Do you really think the United States is the only country that wiretaps on the internet?

    I'm probably making your point here, but the counter-argument is that if ICANN is so useless why are people in such an uproar about it? Somebody has to manage the dns root and ip address allocations. Beyond those two functions, pretty much any country that's connected to the internet can do whatever they want with the portions of it inside of their own borders.

    Let's assume the US did try and assert authority over the internet. How would it do that exactly?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.