Recount Proves No Fraud In NH Primary

murdocj writes "You can take off those tinfoil hats, because the recount results of the NH Primary are in, and the hand count matches the machine count. Everyone can now move on to the conspiracy around the Texas flying saucer. In fact, only 40% of the vote was recounted (that's all that Dennis Kucinich was willing to pay for), but that 40% shows that the machine and hand counts match up nicely. As was pointed out when this 'story' broke, areas that have machine counting tend to have different demographics than hand-counted areas, and thus a difference in voting patterns."

Comments

Re:OF course

[workindev]

That all the people who immediately claim "voter fraud" when they don't like the outcome of the election are delusional?

Re:Did Diebold write this?

[illumin8]

First of all, the Republican ballots haven't been counted yet. Secondly, Kucinich ran out of money so not all of the ballots on the Democratic side were counted. Not only that, but the chain of custody for the ballots was severely lacking.

Yeah, because they obviously went to so much trouble that they had to manufacture brand new ballots to perfectly match the fraudulent machine count. And they did this all overnight, while the ballots were stored in this warehouse with "post-it notes" sealing the boxes.

You conspiracy nuts really need to just chill out. New Hampshire is one state, with only a few delegates. It's not even worth the time and money it would require to perpetrate vote fraud.

Get over it. Ron Paul lost. He will continue to lose, because his ideas don't appeal to the majority of Americans.

Now I'm going to be modded into oblivion by all of the Ron Paul freaks, but who cares, I speak the truth.