Slashdot Mirror
Web Hosting For Privacy Activists?
BritishColumbian writes "I'm thinking about setting up a Web site driven by user submissions. I was wondering which locations have the most liberal (i.e., libertarian) privacy laws. There are some great hosts in the US, however there have been so many FBI requests for user data that I don't want a server hosted under US jurisdiction. Does anyone have any thoughts/suggestions as to a suitable jurisdiction? It doesn't look like Sealand's HavenCo is guaranteed to be privacy-friendly any more."
go after terrorist organizations, child pornographers, etc.
if you are hosting such things, you deserve to be hunted down
but with your jibe at "libertarian" one assumes you are the usual privacy absolutist who simply doesn't understand the government has no interest in you. it inflates your ego to think anyone in society or the government actually feels threatened by you
it is of course evil for governments to oppress people just for speaking their minds
luckily for you, unless you are in iran or china, no one is going to do that
people actually do evil things in this world, and governments actually go after them for that. and that's a good thing
i know that's a really radical wacky concept i just put forth there and it clashes with your mythology about government oppressing you just for the hell of it, but you can safely ignore me. i'm obviously a brainwashed sheeple or an advance unit of the illuminati
some people just need hysterical melodrama to make their lives feel meaningful i guess
oh, and for saying this, i'm obviously a neocon loving propaganda addled fear loving monster right?
i couldn't possibly be saying this form a point of view who holds both neocons and privacy absolutists in contempt, right?
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
why think about a subject when you can kneejerk your retarded stereotypes and live on in blind propaganda
oh sorry: propaganda is only a tool of neocons, heaven forbid i should suggest it exist elsewhere, or that is exists in you, right?
now if you will excuse me, i have to get back to sucking dick cheney's cock and drinking oil from the sjulls of iraqi children
pfffffffft
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
why think about a subject when you can kneejerk your idiotic stereotypes and live on in blind propaganda
oh sorry: propaganda is only a tool of neocons
heaven forbid i should suggest it exist elsewhere, or that is exists in you, right?
now if you will excuse me, i have to get back to sucking dick cheney's cock and drinking oil from the skulls of iraqi children
zzzzzz
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
your ironic ad hominem has totally destroyed my pov, i am slayed
?!
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
a crime on the level of jaywalking here must be fought tooth and nail, but outright genocide far away is to be yawned at
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it