Slashdot Mirror


The Pirate Bay Tops 10 Million Users

An anonymous reader suggests we go over to Slyck for news that The Pirate Bay has cracked 10 million users. The publicity from the upcoming court case probably helped. "Today, The Pirate Bay asserts itself as the self-proclaimed 'World's Largest Tracker' by topping over 10 million peers, while managing over 1 million torrents. Peter Sunde of The Pirate Bay told Slyck, 'We're very happy to be part of all of this and we hope our users keep sharing those files!... And we're looking to break 20 million as well.'"

6 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Re:10 million users? by Seumas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pirating is something organized criminals selling copyrighted content for money on the streets in Malaysia do. I don't believe there are any pirates on the pirate bay. Aaargh.

  2. Re:It all comes down to $$$ by tero · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently they make back just about what they lose in bandwidth/server costs. Or so they say.
    I guess that will be one of the main points in the upcoming trial.

    The PB guys make it sound like it's ideal hobbyist project and the prosecution wants to paint them as IP thieves bathing in money.

    Here's one article (unfortunately in Swedish)
    http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/artikel_334410.svd

    It "claims" PB is pulling 600k SEK / month with their ads (a sum quoted for last 4 months of activity).
    That works to about USD 93k/month. PB claims most/all of the money goes to upkeep of the site, bandwidth and servers.

    Interesting to see if the prosecution manages to get a coherent case out of this... I have my doubts.

  3. Re:It all comes down to $$$ by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Informative
    I could believe PB would chew close to 93K a month in costs if they have 10 million users.

    if 1/2 their registered users visit just once a month and they get another 5 million drive by's (which is easy to see happening) and the average bandwidth used per user is 0.5meg (also pretty mild) it would mean they need 5 terabytes of bandwidth spread out over multiple 100mbit links, not to mention how much all the rackspace would set them back.

    if google can make billions providing ad based search results then i can't hold the PB guys to ransom over what ever measley profit they make. after all all the PB stuff is indexed on google anyway.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  4. Re:Suprnova? by mxs · · Score: 4, Informative

    "suprnova" never did account for "40% of traffic online". BitTorrent did. Suprnova was just a popular BitTorrent site (among many), and its traffic was measurable in hundreds of megabits/s, not hundreds of gigabits/s

  5. Re:Biggest tracker and it shows by mxs · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "tracker" is not searchable at all. It's also not crappy at all -- it supports 10 million peers almost effortlessly, is build on OpenTracker (http://erdgeist.org/arts/software/opentracker/ -- there are also some tpb tracker graphs over yonder if you look around a bit : http://opentracker.blog.h3q.com/mrtg/).

    The SEARCHING part would be part of the PirateBay website, the one you get the .torrent files from. That's not a tracker (although some crappy PHP projects proclaim this to be so). It's searchable just fine, and most of it is not "shit". Of course, some elitist folks prefer "private" trackers (haha) with "enforced" ratios (bwahaha, especially if you know how BitTorrent works) and consider any file posted on such pure gold. Have fun with that.

  6. Re:Biggest tracker and it shows by dmsuperman · · Score: 5, Informative

    The best one I ever used was Demonoid, but since they've recently gone down due to the CRIA...
    You could find anything on there, and it always had seeders, and it was always well described and had a lot of comments, and there were never fakes, and it was always good quality. Demonoid just plain owned.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: Go!