George Lawrence Photography Revisited
danlor writes "We were all taken aback 4 years ago when someone linked us the history of George Lawrence and his photos of the aftermath of the 1906 San Fransisco earthquake. I personally thought to myself: man, I would love to make one of those cameras. The idea of flying 2,000-pound cameras with kites... Well, someone has actually recreated the feat. They even provide links to get large prints of the original and recreated scenes."
According to TFA, the camera weighed only a rather less impressive 46 lbs.
The summary is wrong. It defies common sense that someone would be flying a 907kg (2,000lb, for SI-impaired ones) anything on a kite. Actually, the camera had around 21kg (46lb), as stated by TFA. But the kite was flying around 610m (2,000ft) high, and this is where I think the figure came from.
My neighbor's
Here are all the important links (I thought coral cache would rewrite the links, but it doesn't): http://www.ronkleinphotos.com.nyud.net/Lawrence.html http://www.ronkleinphotos.com.nyud.net/success.html http://www.ronkleinphotos.com.nyud.net/lawrenceorderform.html Please mod parent redundant.
Links:
http://www.ronkleinphotos.com.nyud.net:8090/Lawrence.html
http://www.ronkleinphotos.com.nyud.net:8090/success.html
PS. Install the Slashdotter extension for Firefox, does the CC links automagically.
.: Max Romantschuk
That's nearly a tonne... the article states that the camera is approx 46 pounds. Submitters... please rtfa before submitting. And if you did, then pay attention to it.
They recreated the photos, not the actual taking of the photos.
I know the the camera was was not 2000lbs
but here is a link to show a kite CAN lift more then you think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHkAL1jTojY