Slashdot Mirror


Taiwan Group Responsible For 90% of MSFT Piracy

Stony Stevenson writes "Microsoft claims that a small group led by a recently jailed Taiwanese man was the source of almost all high-quality pirated copies of its software up until his arrest in 2004. The claim suggests that Microsoft practically wiped out commercial piracy of its products with the arrest of Huang Jer-sheng, the owner of Taiwan-based software distributor Maximus Technology. Microsoft announced today that Huang and his associates. who were all recently sentenced to jail time, had been responsible for the 'production and distribution of more than 90 percent of the high-quality counterfeit Microsoft software products either seized by law enforcement or test-purchased around the world.'"

9 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. High quality? by Electrode · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't think there was such a thing as high-quality Microsoft software, pirated or otherwise...

    1. Re:High quality? by arivanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Compared to a stripped and vandalised "recovery disk" it is high quality. You could actually install from it.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:High quality? by Torodung · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL.

      Slashdot needs a +1 "obligatory" modifier, so these sorts of jokes can be tagged as "obligatory" instead of "funny." ;^)

      --
      Toro

    3. Re:High quality? by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
      I didn't think there was such a thing as high-quality Microsoft software, pirated or otherwise...

      Obviously, he modified the software extensively before selling it. The fact that it was high-quality is, of course, what tipped people off that it wasn't an authentic Microsoft product.

  2. High quality? by DuncanE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on... using "High quality" and "Microsoft products" in the same sentence?

    So they were responsible for 9 out the 10 pirate copies of Microsoft Flight simulator then? ;-)

  3. high quality? by boguslinks · · Score: 5, Funny

    had been responsible for the 'production and distribution of more than 90 percent of the high-quality counterfeit Microsoft software products

    Why doesn't MSFT sell these "high-quality" products instead of the crap they've been selling us for years.

  4. Re:quantifying the unquantifable! by treke · · Score: 5, Informative

    The quote in the summary is more specific. It's the "production and distribution of more than 90 percent of the high-quality counterfeit Microsoft software products either seized by law enforcement or test-purchased around the world."

    So they're only talking about the stuff they've confiscated and not claiming it's 90% of everything that exists.

  5. Re:quantifying the unquantifable! by kripkenstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The quote in the summary is more specific. It's the "production and distribution of more than 90 percent of the high-quality counterfeit Microsoft software products either seized by law enforcement or test-purchased around the world."

    So they're only talking about the stuff they've confiscated and not claiming it's 90% of everything that exists. That's pretty much it. They're talking about 'high-quality piracy', not casual piracy as in downloading from the Pirate Bay or burning your friend a copy. High quality piracy in this context means that CDs are pressed, covers forged, everything in order for the product to look like it is authentic. It is then sold as if it were in fact authentic (as opposed to casual piracy, where no money trades hands).

    It is very hard to know how much casual piracy there is. However, it is far easier to know how much high-quality piracy exists, because we are talking about actual physical products here, tangible evidence. They are also manufactured somewhere. Then, assuming that law enforcement captures such high-quality piracy in a random sampling manner (that is, all such forged products have the same chance to be caught - a working hypothesis, debatable of course), then this Taiwanese group was the source of 90% of that. So, presumably (by statistical inference) this group is responsible for 90% of high-quality piracy.

    It's a little surprising that a single group is so dominant in this area, actually, I wouldn't have expected it. However, the more interesting question is what will happen now: if suddenly 90% of these forgeries vanish off the market, what will the people buying them do? Will other suppliers fill the gap, or will the buyers turn to casual piracy, or to alternate OSes?
  6. Re:quantifying the unquantifable! by Skrynesaver · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Perhaps the title is misleading, the linked article claims that this group was responsible for 90% of counterfeit MS products. That's not piracy, it's forgery - individuals downloading and burning copies for their own use is piracy random definition according to my personal dictionary. This however was organised crime (insert "and MS isn't?" joke here) a very different proposition.

    While I loathe and detest MS and their general operating methods, (particularly the whole BSA garbage), they are entirely justified in prosecuting this crew for fraud/forgery etc... though they may get bit by the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome as they, among others, have been claiming that every kid with a torrent client is a threat to the stability of the economic system itself. </rant>

    --
    "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy