Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Upgrades Vista Kernel in SP1

KrispySausage writes "One of the big features discussed in early speculation of Windows Vista SP1 was the kernel upgrade, which was supposed to bring the operating system into line with the Longhorn kernel used in Windows Server 2008. With Vista SP1 going RTM, there hasn't been so much as a peep from Microsoft about the mooted kernel update. Has it happened? Well the answer is yes it has. Presumably the main reason for Microsoft's silence on the subject is that as they're keen to promote the improvements and enhancements to Vista, rather than placing emphasis on a kernel upgrade, which some people might see as a risk of newly-introduced instability."

6 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. I was kind of hoping to see a performance review.. by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..of SP1 RTM, kind of like what the exo performance/xpnet people did late last year.

    I am one of the many who switched back to XP..performance on my tablet stunk with Vista. However, I did like some of the ease-of-use mobility features, but it wasn't worth the grief of performance and drivers.

    I would like to run Vista....I just need a compelling reason to do so.

  2. Re:confused by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's interesting you say that--I just installed the release candidate for SP3 on my XP VM, and I'll tell you--it made a huge difference to the performance of XP. It now functions just fine with the meager amount of RAM I allotted to it, and it functions well with Office 2007 (i.e., it doesn't take forever to open or run slow) despite, once again, the meager amount of RAM I allow it to use.

    And, of course, as you noted, XP is losing support next year--just as it's running better than ever!

  3. Re:I was kind of hoping to see a performance revie by afedaken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Finally, another tablet user!

    I occasionally game on my unit, so now I'm running an XP/Vista dual-boot, but msot of my work time is in Vista these days. For my unit, it doesn't seem to be appreciably slower than XP was, (but to be fair, I'm not running Aero Glass since the integrated graphics don't support it) and some of the features work noticeably better.

    For me specifically:
    - Handwriting Recognition is improved. (In both English, and Japanese.)
    - Searching was greatly improved.
    - Hibernation to file now restores properly every time.

    System specs:
    Toshiba R15-s822
    1.6GHz Pentium M
    160GB HD
    2GB RAM
    Vista Ultimate.

    Would you tell me a bit more about your Vista experience? Specifically, was it the over-all experience that sent you running back to XP, or was it the tablet specific features?

    --
    If there's a castle floating upside down in the sky, then there's a castle floating upside down in the sky.
  4. Re:I dont get it by operagost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can a normal user tell exactly what the differences were between Windows 2000 and XP (NOTICE I SAID NORMAL USER!!!) no they can not.
    Do "normal" users play games, have wireless networking, use webcams, unzip files, or switch between users?
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  5. Re:What?! by SleeknStealthy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree that the article is weak, but I downloaded the leaked rtm and installed it this past Saturday on my laptop. I had originally moved back to xp on the laptop because of the obvious performance problems with vista. However, sp1 makes a massive difference on a few different levels:
    1. suspend / resume
    2. memory consumption
    3. Finally fixes the horrendous performance when copying files
    4. Network performance is excellent even when listening to music.

    Overall on a laptop that is not my primary computer I am pleased with the huge difference sp1 actually does make. I am sure within a few more weeks my mind will change, but there is not question about the increase in performance.

    --
    Math
  6. Re:confused by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What do you mean, "as a media center"? Can you not use Debian/Ubuntu or something?


    No. I can't.

    I'm talking about as an HTPC, and there's hardware in my system that simply doesn't work with Linux. There are absolutely no drivers for NEC-based TV tuner cards, such as my AverMedia M780. It's a gorgeous card... generates *much* less heat than a similar Hauppauge card does *especially when viewing 1080i HDTV*, better picture, and better ATSC reception than anything else I've tried. Absolutely the best TV tuner card I've found. But it's simply not supported by Linux. And switching to Hauppauge or something else isn't an option, because this is a passively cooled silent PC, and having a tuner card with a block temperature 30'C hotter than the M780 is out of the question.

    There *are* Linux-based HTPC options. MythTV, for example. But the lack of support for some of the hardware I have in my system is a deal-breaker. What's the point of having a PVR/HTPC that doesn't have a working TV tuner?

    So my HTPC/Media Center runs on Vista. Because in that respect, Vista is better than XP: the interface is better laid out and more intuitive. But in my experience, that's the only way in which it's better.
    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb