Slashdot Mirror


One Step Closer to IPv6

gbjbaanb writes "IPv6 came a step closer yesterday as ICANN added IPv6 host records to the root DNS servers, reports the BBC. 'Paul Twomey, president of Icann which oversees the addressing system, told the BBC News website there was a need to start moving to IPv6. "There's pressure for people to make the conversion to IPv6," he said. "We're pushing this as a major issue." The reason for the urgency, he said, was because the unallocated addresses from the total of 4,294,967,296 possible with IPv4 was rapidly running out. "We're down to 14% of the unallocated addresses out of the whole pool for version 4," he said. Projections suggest that this unallocated pool will run out by 2011 at the latest.'"

13 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. Oh Noes The Internets! by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 2, Funny
    We're running out of tubes!!!

    Seriously, though, I have a feeling that IPv4 will be saved by an ingenious tech solution far in advance of the world running out of addresses.

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
  2. My home network allows over 10M hosts by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sadly, it can't Talk dirEctly to my Next-DOor neighbor, who runs an equally large neTwork.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  3. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe we can finally get rid of the abomination that is NAT. Then all those Windows machines will become exposed to the Real Internet, and the false sense of security granted by their little home router will shatter the illusion of Windows stability once and for all.

    Either that, or router manufacturers will start including SPI firewalls that aren't completely useless.

  4. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I completely agree with you. That is why I am going to pledge my entire allocation of the 10.0.0.0/8 network back to the IANA. As long as we ensure that it is reallocated properly, I think it will be a huge benefit for the Internet as a whole. For those of you who might control a part of or the entire 172.16.0.0/12 or 192.168.0.0/16 network, you might want to ask yourself this question: do I really need that many addresses?

  5. temporary fix by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

    just switch to IPv5 until things get sorted out

  6. Peak IP? by misleb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have we reached Peak IP?

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  7. Re:Sad by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats 2^48 Internets! Why would you want that? One of my staff sent me an Internet the other week, and it took three days to arrive! If everyone has 2^48 Internets, my staff's Internets will never arrive.
    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Re:Sad by misleb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't Bill Gates once say, "127.0.0.1 should be enough for anybody." Damn, he's always so short sited.

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  9. Blame it on the man! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is all Al Gore's doing, I just know it. Go make the internet again, and this time do it right!

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  10. Re:Sad by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, if those companies complain, who cares. They wouldn't get such large and prestigious allocations in an IPv6 network anyways. So what's the difference. yeah, we'll restrict them to a meagre 281474976710656 addresses like everyone else. That'll show them, and if they want more than a single /48 then they can just go whistle, loooosers.

  11. Re:Sad by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just hope that the guy who holds the 127.0.0.0/8 network never follows suit. All his hosts have the largest pr0n collection I've ever seen!

  12. Re:Sad by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    But 3% of 2011 is over 60 years!

  13. Just like toothpaste is more like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm not sure we'll ever completely run out of ipv4 addresses... think of it like toothpaste in a tube. We never really run out, it just gets harder and harder to extract a large enough quantity to become useful.

    Ipv6 will eventually become *easier* - and it's at THAT point that we'll all clamor aboard the train.