Slashdot Mirror


Hotmail Doesn't Work With Linux Firefox 2.0

An anonymous reader tips a column up at freesoftwaremagazine.com in which the writer discovers that the latest UI enhancements that Hotmail has recently introduced don't work with Firefox 2.0 under Linux. The writer concludes that the webmail interface has been artificially limited by basic user-agent sniffing. The solution is simple enough — spoofing the User Agent that Firefox reports.

17 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Kind of Misleading by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hotmail Doesn't Work With Linux Firefox 2.0 That's a bit misleading. I used Hotmail on my Linux box last night. It was the regular web interface & worked fine.

    So there must be some new enhancements that maybe only subscribers get to use? Or perhaps these are more office tools that don't work in Firefox. Ok, well, before I go on, I wish someone somewhere would have pointed out that the Google apps are both free and work in Firefox. So that's sounding more and more like an easy choice/solution for Mitch Meyran's problems.

    I would posit, however, that since Google's apps are probably for the most part built using GWT I'd bet that Microsoft's equivalent will be based on Silverlight. I have no idea since I have not used this but I do know that Firefox's Silverlight plugin is in beta. What does surprise me is that my company allows me to use Outlook Web Interface which 1) works in Linux & 2) works in Firefox 2.0. Most surprisingly it's quite slick!

    So if I may state my opinion, you're probably suffering from Microsoft's attempt to assert its dominance by forcing you to use Explorer in Windows. So if they are forcing you into this ultimatum, you can either respond by bending to their will and falling into their Monopolistic strong arm practices or you can look for another solution that meets your needs. It would be an easy choice for me but you're the consumer with the money, it's your choice.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Kind of Misleading by kripkenstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a non-story [...] Hotmail works fine from Linux + FireFox - I too tried it last night. It's got some deprecated functionality, but that's pretty much par for the course with Microsoft-oriented webapps under Linux. Um, what? So you're saying that there is nothing wrong with Microsoft serving limited functionality to Linux users, "that's just how it is"?

      This sort of thing is totally unacceptable. First, it might even be illegal as abuse of Microsoft's monopoly (yes, Hotmail 'works' on Linux, but it works better under Microsoft's OS). Second, there is no excuse for this. Last I checked, Gmail and Yahoo mail work perfectly fine, with all functionality, on Windows, OS X and Linux. As Microsoft has more money than both of these rivals, plainly it could support Firefox under Linux. But it prefers to leverage synergy with Windows (I almost choked on the marketspeak there, but you get what I mean).

      So no, that this is 'par for the course' with Microsoft does not mean it is ok, and certainly does not mean it is not worthy of a Slashdot story. It is 100% worthy, word needs to get out about this sort of thing.
  2. Hotmail? by rvw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The solution is simple enough -- spoofing the User Agent that Firefox reports. Another solution is not to use Hotmail at all.
    1. Re:Hotmail? by threeturn · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly

      ... and don't buy an Iphone and then crack it. If you love open technology don't kludge around products that try to keep you out - find alternatives.

    2. Re:Hotmail? by eebra82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another solution is not to use Hotmail at all. Not the easiest thing to do if you have had Hotmail for many years. Besides, Hotmail is not a bad email client at all. It's definitely not better than Gmail, but still versatile enough.
  3. You geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just use IE for Linux like anybody else, ok? You bloody geeks..

  4. Damn whiners by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Another article by another clueless user. He could have just used Internet Explorer for Linux.

    Sheesh.

  5. Spoofing user agent is no solution by macsforever2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spoofing the user agent is no solution, even if it does work. That's what Micro$oft wants you to do so that it appears that more people are using IE than actually are. The numbers game is far more important than the number of users who actually use Firefox.

    The best solution is to dump hotmail and move to a better free email client like Gmail or Yahoo.

  6. Nor with Opera by Badbone · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've found that Hotmail doesn't work too well with Opera either. And a change in the user agent string doesn't help.

    The only way to reply to messages is to choose "plain text" instead of rich text. Rich text is the default, but you are not able to type anything. So, choose plain text. Except that when you do that, a random half of the time, Hotmail erases your entire message.

    In order to use Hotmail with any ability with Opera, Ive had to develop a several step workaround, just to reply to email. Thats one (more) reason why the upcoming Yahoo/MS merger worries me. If Yahoo mail goes the way of Hotmail, my workaround will move from occasional to every single damn time.

    --
    It can be go tiem now plees?
  7. Re:This seems desperate... by gazbo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Or alternatively they have a browser sniffing script that whitelists known-good browser setups, and FF2/Linux isn't tested and known to work? Or that their FF detection is too strict and so accidentally excludes UA strings that have slight differences?

    Why assume it's malicious, when this sort of issue is well known to anyone who's ever tried to support multiple browsers through UA sniffing?

  8. Re:This seems desperate... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why assume it's malicious, when this sort of issue is well known to anyone who's ever tried to support multiple browsers through UA sniffing? Oh, there you go again, trying to ruin our Microsoft-bashing funfest with stupid things like "logic" and "reason". Sheesh. You must be new here.
  9. Re:This seems desperate... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    most of their staff are so dumb that they might have thought they could get away with it

    Really? That's really what you think about the people that administer a giant network used by millions of people - that they're just dumb? If there IS an oversight here, why are you assuming that it's some amateur attempt to punish Firefox users (who have been using the service happily for years now), when it's more likely just a misconfigured agent sniffer that needs to be fine tuned around the new FF version's specific appearance on a Linux box? If you, personally, are so much smarter than the software and network engineers that maintain that system, and really think that MS would not care about preventing people from using their system and seeing the advertisements there, which generate revenue, then why aren't you doing something more successful than they are? Or, are you just taking time away from whatever your "smarter than most of the staff at Microsoft" talents normally have you doing on a typical Friday? Give it a rest.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  10. Yahoo! Trainwreck Coming by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This exact disaster is exactly why Microsoft cannot be allowed to extend its monopoly to absorb Yahoo. When Yahoo fails the way Hotmail now has with Firefox, the way Hotmail did when MS tried to cut it over to Windows servers, the Internet will take a major hit. Even if it drives consumers to GMail, that just reinforces Google's dominance, without credible competition.

    The Internet itself is a hothouse for competition. The global environment for megacorps, though, is precisely the opposite. When the business drives the apps, which it always will at that scale, the Internet's flexibility will become a hothouse for monopolies. Since the entire world depends on the Internet, that Internet monoculture must be stopped. That's why people have governments: to stop the ambitious among them from exploiting advantages that hurt everyone else.

    There is every evidence that Microsoft's control of Yahoo would be a disaster, and no evidence that it would be good for anyone but Microsoft (and maybe the Yahoo shareholders they buy off). If the deal goes through, that's the proof that the people need to change our governments to actually protect us, instead of serving these monopolies.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. Re:again with the user agent excludes? by hool5400 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there was a browser called Oprah, i think it would be bloatware.

    --

    Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
  12. Microsoft isn't the only one doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I honestly think that so-called "web developers" should be banned from ever looking at the user-agent string. Example: My bank's website works on every browser I've tried it with, except Firefox on OpenBSD. (Yes, it works on Firefox on Linux.) This is kind of ridiculous, so I sent in an email about it. I got some ignorant tech support email back clearly not understanding the problem.

    Web "developers" are simply dumb. That's all. Yes, this suddenly turns into a huge story because it's Microsoft. But, even in that case, I wouldn't be surprised if this is just somebody they hired in a low level position being ignorant.

  13. Opera won a lawsuit about this kind of thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Remember when MS skewed pages being viewed by Opera, but if you told Opera to identify as IE, they'd work just fine? Opera won their lawsuit against MS for that. Perhaps another lawsuit should be in the works.

  14. Yahoo by jefu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Makes you wonder what will happen if Microsoft acquires Yahoo.