Slashdot Mirror


Competitors Ally With Comcast In FCC P2P Filings

crocoduck writes "Right before the deadline passed for filing comments in the FCC investigation of Comcast's traffic-management practices, telecoms and other cable companies submitted a slew of comments defending Comcast's actions to the FCC. 'Just about every big phone company has filed a statement challenging the FCC's authority to deal with this problem. AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest all submitted lengthy remarks on February 13th, the last day for comments on the proceeding (parties can still reply to comments through the 28th). "The Internet marketplace remains fundamentally healthy, and the purported 'cure' could only make it sick," AT&T's filing declared. "At best, the network-management restrictions proposed by Free Press and others would inflict wasteful costs on broadband providers in the form of expensive and needless capacity upgrades — costs that would ultimately be passed through to end users, raise broadband prices across the board, and force ordinary broadband consumers to subsidize the bandwidth-hogging activities of a few."' P2P fans have also weighed in."

4 of 220 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Needless capacity upgrades? by msobkow · · Score: 4, Informative

    The United States has been falling behind on the capacity game for a long time now, so it only makes sense that the ISPs and telcos there are crying the blues about the need for upgrades. Had they been upgrading all the way along as other countries have, they wouldn't have the capacity shortfall that they do now.

    I deal with SaskTel as my ISP. We actually get the full use of the provisioned bandwidth as promised, with no filtering, traffic shaping, or other artificial impediments. The downside? My internet connection costs $45/month instead of $22 for the basic "DSL Lite" subscription.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  2. Re:Needless capacity upgrades? by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 4, Informative

    The downside? My internet connection costs $45/month instead of $22 for the basic "DSL Lite" subscription. Downside?! That's less than Comcast!
    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  3. Re:Western countries' telecoms seem crotchety by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my experience in Eastern Europe, customers that heavily use bandwidth are the average customer. I know hardly a single household that doesn't massively download music and films. Nonetheless, the local ISPs can keep monthly fees down to what is even by local standards cheap, and people are increasingly getting fiber to their door. Funny how the U.S., that beacon of technological progress, is being outdone by some former Communist states.

    You're right, and it's not funny, it's sad.

    The US is falling more and more behind, while the telecoms have the gall to say things like:

    "The Internet marketplace remains fundamentally healthy, and the purported 'cure' could only make it sick," AT&T's filing declared. "At best, the network-management restrictions proposed by Free Press and others would inflict wasteful costs on broadband providers in the form of expensive and needless capacity upgrades".

    This is what happens when 'free market' monopolies are allowed to continue unchecked by a corrupt FCC.

    The money goes straight into shareholder's pockets, and almost nothing goes back into the network.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  4. Re:Why Did They Wait Until The Last Day? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because they didn't want the public & think tanks to submit comments ripping apart or contesting their arguments.


    But... but...

    (parties can still reply to comments through the 28th).
    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.