Slashdot Mirror


Gravity Lamp Grabs Green Prize

eldavojohn writes "A lamp powered by gravity has won the second prize at the Greener Gadgets Conference in NYC. From the article, "The light output will be 600-800 lumens — roughly equal to a 40-watt incandescent bulb over a period of four hours. To "turn on" the lamp, the user moves weights from the bottom to the top of the lamp. An hour glass-like mechanism is turned over and the weights are placed in the mass sled near the top of the lamp. The sled begins its gentle glide back down and, within a few seconds, the LEDs come on and light the lamp ... Moulton estimates that Gravia's mechanisms will last more than 200 years, if used eight hours a day, 365 days a year." The article contains links to the patents and the designer/inventor Clay Moulton's site." I think my laptop would require a slightly larger weight to pull this off.

3 of 596 comments (clear)

  1. Bending Space-Time Lights the Way by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The acrylic lens will be altered by time in an attractive fashion, Moulton said. "The LEDs produce a slightly unnatural blue-ish light. As the acrylic ages, it becomes slightly yellowed and crazed through exposure to ultraviolet light," he said. "The yellowing and crazing will tend to mitigate the unnatural blue hue of the LED light. Thus, Gravia will produce a more natural color of light with age."

    He predicted that the acrylic will begin to yellow within 10 to 15 years when Gravia is used in a home's interior room.

    Why would I buy a product that takes 10-15 years to become tolerable for normal household use, when in 10-15 years, either this technology will be updated so that it comes with natural light out of the box, or new competing technologies develop that do the same thing, without the color drawback?
    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  2. Re:Home Gym.. by krlynch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    how long before the home gym captures energy for your home.

    Never :-)

    Humans can not produce large amounts of sustained output power, even when exercising. A "healthy human" can probably push out 300W for about 20 minutes before they collapse from exhaustion. Even if you can convert all of that to electricity and store it for later use at something like 50% efficiency (which would be staggeringly high), you're only talking about 0.05kWh of usable energy. You could do much better if you were willing to exercise at much lower intensity for much much longer periods of time (but who would do that just to light a minuscule handful of light bulbs). But you're really not going to ever get usable amounts of power out of your daily exercise routine.

  3. Re:It can't possibly work either by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, what the hell. Exactly what kind of worthless prize or conference is this, that they didn't check to see that you need 1000 times the energy the weight could possibly provide? And exactly what kind of scientist designed this thing that can't possibly work?

    Meanwhile they're talking about how it would last two hundred years. Right. That's what they spent thier time with, trying to find a way to convince people how incredibly green this thing is.

    I hate this sort of environmentalism that has absolutely no regard for reality. This one has no regard for basic conservation of energy, they might as well have said we can solve the energy problem with perpetual motion.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice