Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

AJAX Version of Mathematica Coming

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the this-is-not-mathematics-this-is-theology dept.

stoolpigeon writes "The O'Reilly School of Technology is teaming up with Wolfram Research to provide on-line math courses using an AJAX version of Mathematica. O'Reilly has posted an and interview with Scott Gray, the director of OST, that has more details on the program (named Hilbert after David Hilbert) itself as well as the classes they will be offering."

9 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Sage also has a web interface by k2enemy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sage also has an AJAX interface.

    I've been making an effort to use Sage in place of Mathematica lately and so far I'm impressed. Although, right now I prefer using the CLI rather than the web interface.

    1. Re:Sage also has a web interface by Garridan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it's an AJ interface. Nobody actually uses XML. I think it's great -- of course, I'm one of the primary developers, so I've made it work pretty much how I like it. There are still some issues with it, but it's well over a year old, and pretty stable at this point. During the joint AMA/AMS meeting in San Diego, Eric Wesstein came up to the Sage booth, and said that he'd copied a bunch of stuff from Sage when he was working on the Combinatorica package. Now, it looks like they've copied a bunch of my ideas, too!

      I think this is a beautiful thing. When William Stein started Sage, he wanted to beat Magma. Soon thereafter, he decided that he'd need to catch up to Mathematica. Now, less than 3 years later, they're racing to catch up to us...

    2. Re:Sage also has a web interface by Garridan · · Score: 2, Informative

      He admitted to copying ideas, not code. Sorry to get your hopes up. ;)

  2. Re:Matlab by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 5, Informative

    You mean Matlab isn't considered the best? I kid, I kid.

    Kid you may, but Mathematica is a computer algebra system, which means its good at manipulating symbolic mathematics. Matlab is primarily used for vector/matrix manipulation and is more engineering-oriented. I wish people would realize that in spite of the many commonalities (including the prefix "Mat"), they are different products with different uses and audiences.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  3. Re:Hmm... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I understand your point - I think you are missing an important piece of information. It was not previously a web app.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  4. Re:Are you kidding? by Garridan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or, you could use a computer algebra system which has easy-to-use distributed computation built in already. Oh, did I mention, it's open source, so every single point above (with possible exception of software updates) is completely invalidated?

  5. SageMath by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 5, Informative

    The open source mathematic software compendium Sage already has something similar that you can test right away in SageNB. Interestingly, one of the possible backends is Mathematica.

    --

    To do list for Windows
  6. Re:Is my documentation worthless? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I had to start using Mathematica for my courses, ....

    Had to, or were too lazy to go without?

    Mathematica is a blight upon the scientific world. The price is outrageous, the code is closed source and the learning curve never stops rising. The thing is like some kind of religious oracle; arcane, totally inscrutable, and regarded by almost everyone as infallible. Did I mention the price?

    It would be nice to see an open source, scrutable and affordable counterpart to Mathematica. Something like GNU Octave is to Matlab. Looks like it's never going to happen though. Maxima, Sage and Axiom all fail to make the grade, and have infuriating names besides. The situation is less and less likely to change as people who "have" to use Mathematica in their courses keep entrenching the thing deeper and deeper.

    Did I mention the price?
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  7. Mathematica suxxor by Fred+0101010011 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too bad for those who must, by some reason, use Mathematica... It is probably the biggest mystery of a software of all times, for instance, the code syntax used are unique to Mathematica and a complete mess, it doesn't make sense at all and reminds me of no other language. Wolfram Is also the evil empire I have heard, treating their customers incredibly inappropriate. I used Mathematica for a project... I ended up wanted to smash my keyboard mainy due to the idiotic-style coding and the general moron-behavior of Mathematica's front end... then I tried Maple - and since then I'll never touch Mathematica again. Avoid Mathematica at all cost - use Maple or some free alternative.