Slashdot Mirror


WizKid Robot Debuts At New York Museum

ScienceDaily is reporting that a new exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art in New York is part computer, part robot, and part child. Part of the "Design and the Elastic Mind" exhibit "WizKid" is able to focus on human faces and follows your movement allowing you to interact with objects on its display simply by waving your arms. "Wizkid looks like a computer with a neck. But there the similarities with the familiar personal computer end. Wizkid isn't static. The screen on the mobile neck moves about like a head, and it's trained to hone in on human faces. Once it sees you, Wizkid focuses on you and follows your movement. Unlike a computer, which requires you to stop what you're doing and adapt your behavior and social interactions in order to use it, Wizkid blends into human space. There's no mouse and no keyboard. You don't touch anything. There's no language getting in the way. On Wizkid's screen you see yourself surrounded by a "halo" of interactive elements that you can simply select by waving your hands. If you move away or to one side, Wizkid adapts itself to you, not the other way around. If you're with a friend, Wizkid finds and tracks both of you and tries to figure out your relationship, expressing surprise, confusion or enjoyment when it gets your response."

58 comments

  1. I can see these selling well by The+Ancients · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...in Japan. The country where you can hire 'family' to visit yours.

    1. Re:I can see these selling well by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      I don't really get this obsession with robotics and non-technical interfaces.. it's horrifyingly inefficient to be following people's faces around while trying to process something else, and waving your arms around doesn't really seem like a very effective input mechanism.

    2. Re:I can see these selling well by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      Efficiency isn't the point here, though.

      The point appears to be to make modern art, not a usable interface.

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    3. Re:I can see these selling well by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Waving your arms around worked pretty well for the EyeToy.

    4. Re:I can see these selling well by somersault · · Score: 1

      My favourite moment with an eye toy was at a friend's house, when I jumped and the back of all my fingers scraped the lovely razor sharp swirly plaster patterns in the ceiling. Stupid fireworks.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Creepy by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't there some principle in AI research that the more lifelike a thing is after a certain point, it no longer seems helpful and instead becomes disconcerting to the user? On the other hand, this isn't quite at the level of creepiness explored in Spielberg's film (sparked by Kubrick) Artificial Intelligence where the robot really does look and act like a real child.

    1. Re:Creepy by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone's thinking it: or Terminator. AI research is very interesting, and simulated neural networks blow me away with their complexity, but just WHY apply it to robots? If you end up creating anything useful, you'll be playing very close to some very deeply-ingrained human fears.. and if you think Slashdot is progressive/liberal enough to be immune from such fears, have you ever struggled against a disconcertingly powerful optical drive servo trying to pull a disk tray open? Yeah. Now you remember. :)

    2. Re:Creepy by Fex303 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't there some principle in AI research that the more lifelike a thing is after a certain point, it no longer seems helpful and instead becomes disconcerting to the user?
      The term you're looking for here is the Uncanny Valley. I don't really know if would it would apply to this device though, since it's not designed to look even remotely humanoid.
    3. Re:Creepy by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Google 'Uncanny Valley' for your theory. I would be surprised if this incarnation actually triggered the response widely, though.

    4. Re:Creepy by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      have you ever struggled against a disconcertingly powerful optical drive servo trying to pull a disk tray open? Uh.. not really.. have you ever tried lifting weights? ;)
      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Creepy by somersault · · Score: 1
      From that Wikipedia article:

      David Hanson, a roboticist who developed a realistic robotic copy of his girlfriend's head You've got to laugh :D I can pretty much only think of one use for such a creation! Well, maybe 2.
      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Creepy by zeroharmada · · Score: 1

      you are referring to the uncanny valley... the wikipedia article has some interesting references to the phenomenon.

    7. Re:Creepy by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      You're not very imaginative are you? I can think of THOUSANDS of things to do to a fake GFs head.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    8. Re:Creepy by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 1

      I thought he was referring to this.

    9. Re:Creepy by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's called... a joke?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Creepy by somersault · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, you can make your own humour - no need to just refer to other people's. Maybe he was referring to XKCD, maybe he actually thought up the joke by himself. Even if he was referring to XKCD, it doesn't mean that's automatically the end of the thread and that nobody else is allowed to joke.. *shrug*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Creepy by atamagabakkaomae · · Score: 1

      Being a scientist more or less being involved in similar research ( http://www.takanishi.mech.waseda.ac.jp/ ), I can only say that I would be really happy to create something that was even a little bit as creepy an AI as the one we have in the usual movies (Terminator etc.). Reality is that things like the 'Wizkid' or similar devices might be ok at conveying some crude intelligence through a smart choice of interactive features. However, in fact they are miles away from any kind of 'artificial intelligence' that might even remotely come close to outclassing a human (except in 'calculator' style intelligence of course).

  3. The waving hand UI, ps2? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    The eye toy on the playstation had this type of UI already and it sucked as a menu interface, great for actually playing the games though.

    1. Re:The waving hand UI, ps2? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Waving your arms around? The Wii has that kind of UI.. great as a menu interface, sucked for actually playing the games though.

  4. Short Circuit by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone took the robot from Short Circuit and gave it to Apple designers.

    Seriously though, I seem to recall reading of various pursuits that do the exact same thing, albeit the use of a neck might be somewhat unique. I can recall reading of similar robots, with similar (if not loftier) design goals in publications like SciAm and CPU. This one seems like a glorified EyeToy, as in they seem to be interested in making this a CE device as opposed to perfecting or learning about human machine interaction.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  5. ... uh, not so much by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once it sees you, Wizkid focuses on you and follows your movement. Unlike a computer, which requires you to stop what you're doing and adapt your behavior and social interactions in order to use it, Wizkid blends into human space.

    So it REALLY is like having a kid

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  6. Oblig. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

    SkyNet!

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  7. Good Grief... by glavenoid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I, for one, *dont* welcome our computerized, robot-children overlords. This scares the ever-loving crap outta me :-(

    --
    I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
    1. Re:Good Grief... by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side: every time you have to change their diaper, you get to salvage ICs!

      ooh! Look! Johnny 2.5 pooped another 555!

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  8. just a guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't RTFA or the summary (I did look at the picture), but I guarantee this will be forgotten after a month, only to reappear in some article 50 years from now titled "Wacky Inventions of the Early 21st Century"

  9. "part child" by rumli · · Score: 1

    Okay, this looked vastly different from the Frankenstein creation I was eagerly expecting.

  10. HOME in, idiots by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    Also, what the hell does "part computer, part robot, part child" even mean?

    Is there part of a child in there? No, there is not.

    In fact, all that's in there is a whole computer that mimics some of a child's behavior.

    And what's all this bullshit about it not being a computer because it doesn't behave like a conventional desktop PC?

    Is Science Daily always this fucktarded?

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:HOME in, idiots by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      Is Science Daily always this fucktarded? Don't blame ScienceDaily. They are so damn desperate for content that most of their "stories" are nothing more than press releases - raw or sexed up - and adverstories. I blame the abysmal state of science journalism. Sigh.
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    2. Re:HOME in, idiots by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there part of a child in there?
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: [after examining Dr. Venture's latest invention] What the hell is this thing made out of?
      Dr. Venture: [suspiciously] Nothing.
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: Come on...
      Dr. Venture: All right, fine, I might have used a few unorthodox parts.
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: Just tell me one.
      Dr. Venture: [mumbling] An... orphan.
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: A what?
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: [clearing his throat] An orphan?
      Dr. Venture: Did you say... an ORPHAN?
      Dr. Venture: [weakly] Yeah, a little orphan boy.
      Dr. Byron Orpheus: It's powered by a forsaken child?
      Dr. Venture: [defensive] Might be, kind of - I mean I didn't use the whole thing!
  11. Nontraditional UI by bkaul · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From an AI research perspective, there are of course some interesting aspects. However, from a perspective of actual utility, I'm skeptical.

    When it comes to actually using a computer for office productivity or other "useful" applications, traditional interfaces (keyboard/mouse) are much more efficient and less intrusive. I suppose for home multimedia applications, Microsoft's smart table idea has some merit, but who really wants a computer/robot following them around and pestering them? I don't get the appeal. I don't want my computer to use me or intrude into human interactions as if it were a guest. I want to use it as a tool.

    1. Re:Nontraditional UI by iwein · · Score: 1

      Well I'd love to have one for my 2 year old. I'm desperately trying to teach him to click on the youtube movies of steam trains at 7am, but he's just too stupid to figure out how a mouse works. I have to get out of bed every 10 minutes. Of course just making a very long compilation of train movies would work... maybe I could even loop it, but I'm sure this device would be equally equal to the task.

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  12. Whiz Kid? by rubah · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I had one of these over fifteen years ago!

    1. Re:Whiz Kid? by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Shit I had one 23 years ago, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.O.B.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    2. Re:Whiz Kid? by rubah · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't have myself 23 years ago, so I could only guess. Like most of my toys, it was probably inherited from my brother and sister, children of the 80s to be sure.

    3. Re:Whiz Kid? by antime · · Score: 1

      Wizkid was in fact released just over fifteen years ago.

  13. Child Not Included by StaticEngine · · Score: 5, Funny

    You have to supply your own child parts. Luckily, children are in vast abundance and are easily obtainable, often with little more than some inexpensive candy and a van.

  14. HOME in on... by Kapiti+Kid · · Score: 1

    like a honing pigeon.
    (I can understand that some people don't listen to what they're saying, but it IS possible to check for stupidities before putting a web page up.)

  15. Yes it is part kid by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    It hangs around trying to get your attention and annoys you until you respond. If it could spill juice and barf then it would be closer.

    Remember this is junk science reporting from Science Daily so don't take it too seriously. These are the same folk that tried to say that the "walks on water" robot works the same wy as a water strider - which it does not.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Yes it is part kid by mikael · · Score: 1

      It hangs around trying to get your attention and annoys you until you respond.

      So it won't be any different from going to the park to have lunch, only to find yourself surrounded by mine artists.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  16. Not really that hard to make... by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    I got trashed with the missus on my birthday, and next thing you know, 9 months later we've got a WhizzKid of our own.

    (True story.)

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  17. Action Video by ikarous · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those interested, YouTube has a video of WizKid's home media user interface in action. You can also see a video of the "emotional" expression movements.

    Here.

    1. Re:Action Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning! GOATSE link redirect fake link posted above. IKAROUS is a goatse poster lover

  18. Slashdot Public Education Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got trashed with the missus on my birthday, and next thing you know, 9 months later we've got a WhizzKid of our own.

    Umm... just ya know... that stuff that came out of your ... umm... thingy... 9 months ago wasn't actually "wiz", it was ... well.. another word that rhymes with it. ;-)

  19. "hone" in on human faces? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    Ouch!

    (I think they meant "home" ... not even figurative senses of "hone" fit in this particular context.)

  20. Now I'm a robot? by rickthewizkid · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bad Futurama episode :)

  21. part computer, part robot, part child by pajeromanco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, what the hell does "part computer, part robot, part child" even mean? Manbearpig!
    --
    Now I am sad.
  22. What?! by JavaBasedOS · · Score: 1

    A post about robots on /. and no "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag?!

  23. Perhaps they can spread a bit of the intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then the lead text won't use "it's" for the posessive as it means "it is". Maybe it can also avoid the egregious "hone in" given that "hone" is a transitive verb and I cannot see that "in" is a thing that needs sharpening.

  24. Kismet? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    Seems like this is just similar to Kismet & "Leonardo the Lovable", which have appeared on "Scientific American Frontiers", and various other TV shows..

  25. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wake me up when a lifelike animated paper clip serves to answer my queries regarding word processing in real time

  26. Maybe not so good ALL the time? by socz · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen any pictures, but the short circuit robot- johnny 5 alive - paints a hideous picture! I mean, just think about it! You're at home with your wife/"gf" and you get romantic. Do you really want this thing watching you? Wouldn't that freak you out if it has a "quizzical" or "curious/interested" face/expression?

    What if it can eventually follow you around? When you come out of the bathroom after eating chili it's like, "what happened in there?" You know what i mean? I dunno if i'd want one of those bastards around me! Whatever happened to that japanese sony dog that was "like a real dog?" Can't i just get one of those instead, at least i can play with it and not get freaked out!

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  27. But does it run on... by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 1

    ...well, I had to ask, because my reading and search of the article doesn't find a mention Linux, and I can't imagine something innovative like this running on Windows, especially when Microsoft is still struggling to nail down file copying Vista. So, just curious, you know.

  28. It hunts you by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    It is drawn to human faces and if you move away it hunts you down and destroys you. Welcome the T1!