Slashdot Mirror


Gates Explains Microsoft's Need for Yahoo

eldavojohn writes "Perhaps it's obvious to you and perhaps you'll be pleasantly surprised by his answer but Gates revealed to CNet why Microsoft needs Yahoo. From his response, "We have a strategy for competing in the search space that Google dominates today, that we'll pursue that we had before we made the Yahoo offer, and that we can pursue without that. It involves breakthrough engineering. We think that the combination with Yahoo would accelerate things in a very exciting way, because they do have great engineers, they have done a lot of great work. So, if you combine their work and our work, the speed at which you can innovate and get things done is just dramatically more rapid. So, it's really about the people there that want to join in and create a better search, better portal for a very broad set of customers. That's the vision that's behind saying, hey, wouldn't this be a great combination.""

7 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Translation: by brennanw · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Look, we innovate. We innovate the hell out of stuff. Just yesterday I innovated a donut by taking one off some old guy when I pushed him down a flight of stairs. And Yahoo!, well, we're innovating them right now, and we're going to keep innovating them until they stop moving. Then we'll use their bloated corpse to innovate any Google employee that gets in our way."

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
  2. Gates Explain's Microsoft's Need for Yahoo by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    from the Cmdr-Taco-needs-a-grammar-checker dept.

  3. To Bill Gates by uss · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear Bill Gates,

    First, Take a look at http://www.eep.com/merchant/newsite/samples/ee/ee0801.htm, for "Why Most Mergers Fail".

    Next, take a look at press releases involving mergers in financial and industrial companies.
    Note, how there is highest emphasis on cost savings, and very little mention of ideals and NEW business strategy after the merger.

    Lastly, the kind of "merger" you are suggesting is typically done as a buyout of a small company by a much larger company.

    See! This is what happens if you drop out of Business School.

    For just a 0.1% Fee based on the deal value, I can help provide further advice.

    Good Luck!

  4. Re:Brute force and ignorance by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 5, Funny

    a metric shitload Is that the SI shitload? Is it bigger or smaller than the imperial shitload? Can you combine the two shitloads when, for example, landing spacecraft?
    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
  5. Re:what about marketshare? by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, they don't just want the marketshare. They want to synergize the paradigm!

    And combined accelerate double the speed rapid faster.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Re:Brute force and ignorance by zehaeva · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope its SI, its a lot easier talking about kiloshitloads and centeshitloads as opposed to trying to covert imperial shitloads to shittons and shitgallons.

  7. Re:Um, didn't Gates quit? by Kaetemi · · Score: 5, Funny

    yep, he's responsible for putting back the chairs

    --
    Kaetemi