Slashdot Mirror


Pakistan Blocks YouTube

Multiple readers have written to tell us of news that Pakistan has ordered its ISPs to block access to YouTube "for containing blasphemous web content/movies." This follows increasing unrest in Pakistan over a Danish newspaper's reprinting of cartoons which depict Islam in a less-than-favorable light. The cartoons also sparked controversy when they were first published a few years ago.

37 of 648 comments (clear)

  1. Lets bring these people up to speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We really need to bring these people up to speed with the 21st century. What's the best way to do it? Just start trading with them like anyone else, it's not their fault that they are a bunch of ignorant, gullible sheep (cue the "omg its like teh USA!!!1" comments).

    Yes it will take time to achieve any results, but economic prosperity and theism are inversely related, and theism in places like Pakistan is really fucked up and needs to be eliminated or at least marginalized.

    1. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Remind me what is wrong with circumcision?
      The kids don't get to decide if they want a perfectly healthy part of their body removed.
    2. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best thing that could be done with Pakistan is to raise the number of books people read.

      Many people there, if they read at all, read religious texts only.

      That's your problem. If they had a wider experience in the written word, they wouldn't be so easily led by Clerics with an agenda.

    3. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by melikamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People do not like to admit it about genocide, but if you do it thoroughly, then it actually works, i.e. solves all problems relating to the unpleasant minority, once and for all. You know what is really ironic? That USians modded the parent +funny, whereas it really should be +insightful. Once you get it into your head that it is your Progress-given mission to bring some sovereign people into the 21-st century, genocide is an obvious answer. Bush would wipe Iraq clean if he could, a long time ago (he obviously does not give a shit about 1M Iraqis, almost all of them civilians, dieing due to war, why would he care about 25M?), but US is not powerful enough to do that with conventional weapons, nor does it have enough clout to get away with it.

      How about, instead of "bringing Arabs democracy" and "liberating them from an archaic religion", you liberate them from economic oppression and let them decide what to do with their own oil? Switch to alternative energy sources, perhaps? Develop a defensive military strategy, which should work just fine, as you are on your own frigging continent? Just my 2 cents.

    4. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by garett_spencley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Study after study has found no significant health benefits sufficient enough to warrant circumcision. The American Medical Association no longer recommends the procedure and Ontario Public Health Care no longer pays for it.

      It is technically true that cases of penile cancer are virtually unheard of in males with circumcision, but then again, penile cancer is SO RARE to begin with that it even begs the question of whether or not the sample size is large enough to be conclusive.

      And of course, like the other poster pointed out, the children have no say in whether or not a perfectly healthy part of their body is permanently removed.

    5. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by @madeus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So... why is male genital mutilation still acceptable in the USA? That's certainly something that illudes me.

      I'm leaning towards "the parents who do that do their children are ignorant and unthinking, and don't realize it's a practice that's consider barbaric - and is illegal - in more enlightened European countries" and "the commercial nature of the US healthcare system has lead to hospitals routinely carry out entirely unnecessary cosmetic surgery - even when it's harmful to the patient - because it's profitable".

      Religious zealots have certainly managed to brainwash the US populace on this one, to convince them it's a "morally acceptable" practice, even a humorous thing to discuss if you've had your genitals mutilated. In reality, it's an outdated, entirely unnecessary, damaging and irreparable act of barbarism - IMO anyone carrying out this practice on children should be locked up (and, if a medical practitioner, have their license permanently revoked).

      If grown adults want to have this procedure carried out on themselves then, apart from undergoing some counciling, they may as well be allowed to have it carried out by someone qualified. If indeed grown adults were left to make the decision for themselves, I think the percentage of people who would volunteer for this practice would be tiny and the industry around it would almost completely die out in the US (apart from within certain specific religious groups).

      Fat chance of much change on that front happening in the US though.

      Here in the UK it's illegal to carry out the practice, with a caveat: When it can be proven before a judge that a the child is likely to suffer as a result and both parents agree they want it carried out (e.g. if the child is Jewish or Muslim and likely to be teased, harassed or singled out by their cultural peers and so in some way negatively impacted as a result of the operation not being carried out) then it may be carried out (but Doctors or Surgeons are not obligated to carry it out, and may refuse to do it, that it's a violation of the Hippocratic Oath being a common citation as grounds for refusal).

      While I can appreciate on the surface this is an attempt to reach some pragmatic accommodation, I think this is the wrong approach and the law needs to be changed here too. I don't see medically unnecessary cosmetic surgery on children's genitals as acceptable, full stop. It's systematic of the UK justice system though - in the eyes of the populace the government rarely deals with the perpetrators of crimes directly or appropriately - it's easier just to tell the rest of us to change our behaviors to fit in with however they have redefined the problem.
    6. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...he obviously does not give a shit about 1M Iraqis, almost all of them civilians, dieing due to war

      That number is not generally considered credible except by extreme leftists where the number benefits their agenda. Calculating deaths by polling is rather absurd.

      but US is not powerful enough to do that with conventional weapons,

      Actually, we probably are powerful enough to level the main population centers indiscriminately with conventional weapons. I'm glad we haven't done so, though.

      nor does it have enough clout to get away with it.

      I would hope no-one has enough clout to get away with genocide.

      People do not like to admit it about genocide, but if you do it thoroughly, then it actually works,

      Just because it might work doesn't mean the ends justify the means.

      Develop a defensive military strategy, which should work just fine, as you are on your own frigging continent?

      Because we had a defensive military strategy and we were still hit hard on 9/11, even though we're on our own friggin' continent.

    7. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Education has a lot more impact on a child. Nutrition. Home life. Television.
      You can recover from all of those. You can't (yet) regrow parts of the body that have been surgically removed.
    8. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, no, it does not. Even worse: tell men they are protected (although they are not) and they will not bother using condoms. Ergo, circumcision helps spread AIDS.

    9. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, there's no conclusive evidence that it is harmful either, now is there?
      Yes, there is. Read and learn.
    10. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by spacefrog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here in the UK it's illegal to carry out the practice, with a caveat So in other words, it's legal.

      Which Eurpoean country is 'more enlightened'? Not only does Wikipedia contradict your statement about the UK, but your 'mysterious enlightened country' is no where to be found.

      I'm strongly opposed to circumcision . . . and talking out your ass.
    11. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by the_bard17 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's a quick study for you. Type without your pinkies, and now type with your pinkies - a bit faster, no? You don't need a study to see why pinky fingers are useful.

      Disclaimer: For those of you who suffer from sensitivity to "Too Much Information", now would be a good time to skip this post and continue on. All others, feel free to read on...

      Personal anecdote: I'm uncircumcised. Still got my foreskin, and nobody's taking it from me. Does it serve a purpose? You betcha. I ended up snapping my frenulum several years ago. I simply bandaged it up for a few days, and it healed nicely. However, this required me to pull the foreskin back and keep it there for the duration.

      Woooeeee... lemme tell you, sensitive doesn't even begin to describe it. Y'all circumcised guys might have grown used to it, since you "don't know any better" (assuming they cut on you at birth), but my glans was constantly rubbing, and it drove me crazy. I couldn't wait for it to heal, so I could cover it back up again.

      For any gals that might be reading, my wife mentioned it must be like taking a dry cloth and rubbing against your clitoris all day long. Heaven forbid a dry finger come into contact with her clit... cotton or denim? Ha! There's reasons the foreskin and labia exist... and separating the sensitive bits from the irritants sounds like a good reason to me.

    12. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Skim123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best thing that could be done with Pakistan is to raise the number of books people read.

      First things first: let's help raise the literacy rate. You've really got to respect the work being done by the Central Asia Institute, as they are building non-fundamentalist schools in rural Pakistan and Afghanistan, with schools especially targeted to girls. In a perfect world, our government would cut the spending on armament and give the decrease to the CAI to build schools. That's the best long-term strategy to solving fundamentalism, IMO.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    13. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by Tore+S+B · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the male equivalent of female genital mutilation is removing the glans penis. And that's a tad more horrible than something doctors can't even agree on whether is bad or not.

      I don't think circumcision makes any sense, but I think it trivializes female genital mutilation to suggest that they're anywhere in the same league of badness.

      --
      toresbe
    14. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by @madeus · · Score: 4, Informative

      So in other words, it's legal. I went out of my way to make the situation and my position clear, you've chosen to try and pick and argument, and be an ass about it.

      In the UK, if I were to have a child of mine circumcised, not only would I find it hard most likely impossible to get the hospital to carry it out, but if I did find someone who was willing to carry it out privately as the child would neither be from a Jewish nor Muslim background it is quite clear I would be open for prosecution for assault, even if I didn't carry out the work myself. Which, while from my perspective is much less than ideal (as I still do not think the legislation is robust enough, as I have said), directly contrasts with the situation in the US where it is routinely carried out without any clinical or cultural justification (or even consideration).

      If you'd been following the press reports and court rulings more carefully you might be better informed. You seem to be entirely, relying on Wikipedia to tell you everything you need to know on it and it's not covering the whole story. You don't even seem to be reading the Wikipedia article, which directly contradicts you (not me):

      The only reference on Wikipedia article to a legal opinion - in the form of one published in the Journal of Medical Ethic by Fox and Thomson at Keele University's School of Law - states unequivocally that "there is no compelling legal authority for the common view that male circumcision is lawful." in the opening paragraph of the paper.

      To provide a counter point, a representative from the General Medical Council stated that, in the opinion of the GMC, that it was an ethical issue not a legal one and that they do not believe that male circumcision on the UK is illegal. The GMC, however, are not a legal body and the statement was only the opinion of a representative from the standards committee (not a lawyer).

      One might assume that having having the apparent backing of the GMC (who have published guidelines on the topic) would at least grant some level of legal protection for a licensed practitioner carrying out the procedure, but even I was (if only somewhat) surprised to hear that in the opinions of the legal professionals who were panelists on a BBC debate on the topic last year, that that was not the case and that relying on the GMC's published opinion would not be a valid case for defense. Of course they still have the power to have to have a doctor stuck off for breaking any guidelines which they do choose to set out, all of which is a little incongruous.

      Which European country is 'more enlightened'? Off the top of my head? Finland and Germany have already ruled it's illegal without consent. As noted, in the UK the legislation also affords more protection than in the US (even if it is still incomplete).

      Many European states are in a similar situation, not least because many have similar legislation in place (e.g. state specific legislation - such as the UK's Human Rights Act - and incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights). In the UK the HRA in particular has been a hot topic for a while and has already had a huge impact on health care here and is frequently noted as being relevant when the topic of male circumcision is discussed by medical practitioners and human rights lawyers.
    15. Re:Lets bring these people up to speed by websitebroke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm American, but I've spend quite a bit of time in Pakistan (mostly in rural Kashmir and a bit in Islamabad). People over there are very, very gung ho about getting their kids to learn to read. After the 2005 earthquake that flattened most of the homes in the area, the schools were one of the first things to be rebuilt. I got there in less than 2 months after the earthquake, and kids were already back in school. The system is a bit of a mess, and they have very little to work with as far as materials go, but they certainly are desperate to get educated.

      Personally, I think we'd have a much better return on our investment if we took the money we're spending in Iraq and put it into building schools and providing learning materials in Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine. While we're at it, let's bring some of their young men and women over here to our colleges. Based on how many times I was asked about whether or not it's hard to go to school in the USA, I bet they'd jump at the chance.

      The only time I saw a Qu'ran while I was over there was when I visited a Mosque. People there read pretty much the same sorts things we do.

  2. Morocco tried to block YouTube once... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Morocco tried to block YouTube about a year and a half ago, because there were videos either making fun of the King or criticizing him.

    The block didn't last long because so many people were (figuratively) up in arms about it. Given the amount of "non-offensive" material (i.e. in this case, material not criticizing the king), the government realized their own stupidity and realized it would be better to have a placated populous than risk unrest over such a small thing.

    Are there parallels here? Possibly not, because I guess the blocks are for different reasons. However, it's not like a large amount of YouTube is about the comic or other representations of Mohammed, so... It will be interesting to see if the people cry out and how the government responds...

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  3. The offending content by broothal · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. Cover Story by pinkocommie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The danish thing has been going on for a while, it took them this long to ban it for that?
    Otoh there were elections a few days ago and there were multiple clips about rigging that happened in the election.
    Forward to 1:20 or just search for pakistan rigging
    What's the more probable cause for the ban?

    1. Re:Cover Story by siriusnova · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes I have to agree with you on this.

      As a Pakistani who has spent considerable amount of time in and out of the country, this blocking has absolutely nothing to do with "blasphemous content".

      The reality is that right now in Pakistan there are serious allegations of vote rigging going around, the Military Junta in its usual dictatorial form has to find a cover story to block news about any vote rigging as they already do the same with the regular news media. They blocked the biggest Pakistani News TV being broadcast from Dubai, GEO TV, a few months ago over the news station airing reports critical of the current government.

      I really doubt 90% of Pakistanis even care about the cartoons, this is really an excuse to hide under their real motivations, ie vote rigging.

      There are tons of websites that can be stated as "blasphemous" however none of them are blocked, so why block youtube, especially at this point in time.

      Reeks of a CYA cover story to me.

  5. Re:WHY IS THIS IN POLITICS????!!! by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's cause we own the middle east.

    They just dont know it ;)

    --
  6. Re:Screw Mohammed. by rustalot42684 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck you. Banning Youtube is stupid, but that doesn't mean that Islam itself is bad. There are lots of tolerant Muslim people out there.

  7. Ignoring the differences between the two... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is presenting "Bad Thing B" in answer to "Bad Thing A" still considered a acceptable method of debate?

  8. Obligatory by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."
    -John Gilmore, 1993
    --
    Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  9. Re:End Religion and End Human Suffering! by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Religion is also a large part of the reason for suppression of knowledge, increases in fear and the idea that "ideas are dangerous.

    Yeah, religion is evil. Just look at those religious wackos like Stalin and Brezhnev who killed millions and sent more to death camps or psychiatric hospitals just for reading the wrong books Oh wait, they were atheists. Well, I guess religion hasn't been the single greatest force for murder and oppression in the last century after all.

    The statistics speak for themselves. Between the Soviet Union and China, many more died for Communism than because of religious violence.

    By the way, have you considered that to wipe out religion, you'd have to engage in the same techniques of suppression of knowledge that you condemn? But it's all for the good of society, so it's OK, right? :rolleyes:

  10. Re:Lucky they're not offended by the Bible by computechnica · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder if they have blocked this site: Skeptics annotated Quran

  11. Re:Screw Mohammed. by ushering05401 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Where are they hiding?"

    In plain sight. By virtue of not being fanatical jihad-monkeys they tend to blend in pretty well with their surroundings just like peaceful Jews, Christians, Wiccans, etc..

    Or did you not know that Muslims can look just like anyone else, speak reasonably, and contribute positively to their communities in unassuming and humble manners?

    Hell, if nothing else it is nice having Muslims in your community because their bodegas are open on Christian holidays. Try getting out in the real world once in a while.

  12. This is about politics, not religion. by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know the reason they /gave/ is that YouTube content is blasphemous, but what they /didn't/ tell you is that there have been a lot of really embarrassing videos on YouTube recently. One you might have seen in the news was the one where they showed that there was a gunshot before the explosion that officially was supposed to have killed Benazir Buttho. But it's my understanding that there have been a lot of videos that are /personally/ embarrassing to politicians in Islamabad as well, and this is more probably the motivation behind the ban.

    It serves all the sitting politicians' interests to paint this as a religious thing (including the Bush government); it's up to us to try to see through the propaganda.

  13. Re:Screw Mohammed. by ushering05401 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And yet from these supposedly assimilated folks a disturbingly large amount of funding flows to the Middle East, and they don't seem to protest much when Wahhabi hate literature starts to be distributed in their community."

    Immigrant populations send money home and will continue to do so until exchange rates don't make it profitable to come live in western nations while supporting families elsewhere. Most of that money is going to families who are trying to make do in their ancestral homeland, not terrorist organizations.

    As for hate literature, I have yet to see this happen in my community. On the contrary there are minimum two major interfaith events a year co-sponsored by the largest local mosque and the largest local synagogue not to mention the year end Unitarian celebration that includes Buddhists, Jews, Muslims, Christians, and anyone else who wants to attentd.

    All I have to cite for you is my personal experience gathered while living across the USA in places like L.A., N.Y.C., and now New England. Each of these places has visible Muslim populations, and the examples of interfaith cooperation are everywhere for anyone who cares to look.

    The only really dangerous experience I have had with a religious group was with the 'Black Israelites' in NYC. And anyone who has dealt with them will tell you that there homegrown religious threats as virulent as any imported Muslim variety.

  14. Re:Religion and its leaders by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here in The Netherlands we had a nice one last night, around 01:00 in the night one of the public broadcasters decided to air the old Deep Throat movie, in (eager?) anticipation quite a few religious leaders protested as if they did not have an off button on their TV

    They knew perfectly well they had an off button on their TV. They were angry because they didn't have an off button connected to your TV.

    rj

  15. Not "a" Danish newspaper by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was all of them this time, unlike the first time the were printed. The cartoon in question was the "bomb in turban" drawing from the top of the original article. The were reprinted as a reaction to an alleged murder plot against the cartoonist.

    I'm not sure what kind of reasoning will lead anyone to attempt to murder somebody for insinuating that their prophet inspire violent behavior. By doing so, they just prove the cartoonist right.

  16. Islam requires theocracy by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Islam has an answer to the question of how to stop evil, war, and bloodshed. Their answer is that people need to be forced to be good. An Islamic state with the power to enforce sharia law is essential to the muslim concept of how to overcome evil. When the entire world is under sharia, and everyone is forced to be good, then there will be peace - islam.

    Now there can be liberal interpretations of Islam - where each individual needs to wage "jihad" against their own evil. But this is not the traditional stance, or even an obvious one just from reading Quran. It is an assimilation of the Christian idea that "the line between good and evil runs not between us and them, but through each of our hearts".

    My problem with Islam is that when a person is externally forced to behave well, that might make the streets safer if done effectively, but that person is still not a good person. The evil within them is just biding its time, waiting for an opportunity. And no external enforcement by human beings is perfect. There will always be loopholes and opportunities to do evil.

  17. Re:Islam - Always Used to Getting its Own Way by jdfox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    >Nowhere did I claim the whole community was radicalized

    You might not have meant to, but you did. Both here and here, you referred to entire religious communities, or a monolithic "they". Do you not see the danger of this habit? As a member of the Christian community, do you wish to be included in the "they" of Timothy McVey, George Habash, August Kreis, the Army of God, the Lord's Resistance Army, etc.?

  18. US vs Europe, Muslims vs. Muslims by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it is a difference between EU and US. There is a lot of fear among "moderate" Muslims in Europe about speaking up against the extremists. Far the majority of religiously motivated violence in Europe is extremest Muslims attacking other Muslims they don't consider "Muslim" enough. This goes from murder attempts on Muslim political leaders and academics that are speaking against the extremists, to harassment of women with Arabic names who dress in western style.

    I'm not sure why this is not the case in the US, maybe it is the lower density, or that the "homelands" are farther away. Or maybe you are simply better at integrating immigrants.

  19. Not provocation, solidarity by NIckGorton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cartoons were published by many Danish papers after the police foiled a plot to murder the cartoonist. By publishing these cartoons, the papers were stating something important: we stand in solidarity, we don't give in to bullies, and the sword will never be mightier than the pen.

  20. IP hijacking, not DNS hijacking by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that it's really important, but many are saying there is DNS hijacking going on.

    It's actually IP hijacking (from what I'm reading on the NANOG list anyway). An ISP in Pakistan is advertising a "more specific route" to Youtube's ip space. So, routers are taking the traffic there instead.

    It could easily be accidental, like someone not having the right filter in place to block that advertisement going out to everyone.

    I hope they are enjoying all of the extra packets.

    --
    4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
  21. Disgusted by Pakistan AND Slashdot by oceaniv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been lurking on these boards for about two-three years and the amount of hatred and ignorance on these boards whenever something that has to do with "Islam" comes up is just plain disgusting. Captain Obvious says: 1. A vicious dictatorship, which has recently been accused of the murder of one of the most prominent politicians in the world (Bhutto), decides to ban an important source of information (youtube) from their citizens... (Go see the number of Pakistani political movies on Bhutto's death) 2. They use Islam as an scapegoat to justify their actions so as divert/dilute attention from their personal political motivation by passing on the "blame" to the larger (1 billion) Muslim community 3. At the moment of reading "Islam" and "censor" the so-called freedom-sensitive western slashdotter abandons all rational thought and begins foaming at the mouth. Good job Slashdotters, your intelligence (or rather lack of) is blinding.