Slashdot Mirror


NASA Looking For "Diamonds In The Sky"

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Scientist Charles Bauschlicher and his research team have found a new way to look for 'diamonds in the sky'. It may not be romantic, but diamonds shine especially brightly in the 3.4 to 3.5 micron and 6 to 10 micron infrared ranges, which should make NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope the perfect tool to see them with. Though less common and more monopolized on earth, diamonds are surprisingly common in outer space and the nanometer-sized bits comprise 3% of all the carbon found in meteorites. That means that if meteorite composition is representative of interstellar dust, that dust would contain about 10 quadrillion (1 * 10^16) nanodiamonds per gram."

8 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Diamonds at the core of gas giants? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In his novel 2061: Odyssey Three Arthur C. Clarke described the core of Jupiter as nearly solid diamond, formed by the enormous pressure of the gas giant's atmosphere. Is there any probability that this is true, or was it only a science-fiction author's imagination?

  2. Maybe that explains... by Zondar · · Score: 5, Funny

    why my wife came home today with an application for the space program... and my name was already filled out at the top.

  3. Re:DeBeers should be happy by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 5, Funny

    A whole new marketing campaign suggests itself: "Give her the gift of the stars"

    Because any woman worth marrying knows that if meteorite composition is representative of interstellar dust, that dust would contain about 10 quadrillion (1 * 10^16) nanodiamonds per gram.

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
  4. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news DeBeers has announced plans to launch millions of poverty stricken Africans into space. They'll be equipped with 60 minutes of oxygen and lunch box sized capsules capable of reentering Earths atmosphere.

  5. Re:DeBeers should be happy by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gave her a Klein bottle of superheated hydrogen, and she just burst into flames... I mean, burst into tears. Tears.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  6. Re:Nanodiamonds by Intron · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can make great sandpaper.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  7. Re:DeBeers should be happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They pretty much are on Earth already. There's nothing special about diamonds, really. DeBeers has spent decades convincing everyone how great they are because they've locked up the supply chain from end to end. Search on "blood diamonds" some time.

  8. Re:Asimov would be pleased by SleepingWaterBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, diamonds probably aren't worth the trouble of asteroid mining. Crushed diamond powder is cheap and plentiful right here on earth. It's only the larger chunks of diamond that are valued much, and even those aren't in short supply. The price of diamonds is only as high as it is because a cartel of the major producers work in collusion to keep the prices up. I suppose diamonds from asteroid mining might force them to lower their prices a bit, but it's unlikely that mining asteroids for diamonds could successfully compete with earth based diamond mining.
    Quite possibly if we do end up with asteroid miners, they'll be throwing away cheap carbon compounds like diamonds, in favor of useful ores like iron or nickel.