Bank Julius Baer Issues Statement On WikiLeaks
dtwood writes "The bank that got WikiLeaks.org erased from DNS finally hired a PR agency and issued a press release filled with half truths and non-statements. Tynan on Tech has it, along with some brief commentary. Worth a look."
Can someone please tell Mr Baer that anything he says will be used against him in the court of public opinion?
Sounds like his lawyers are getting nervous.
Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
"The posting of confidential bank records by anonymous sources significantly harms the privacy rights of all individuals." Especially individuals engaged in tax fraud.
Sigh.
I was hoping this story wouldn't get big. I was really hoping that I'd found a bank through which I could launder and stash various... shall we say... "unreported monies". Like a stack of $100 bills the size of a small room. Homeland Security can be really unforgiving about that sort of thing, you know?
I think any reasonable person knows what a half-statement. It's a completely legitimate. Most English professors.
I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
a bag of walnuts!
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
They didn't say the material is not authentic. Just that they deny that it is authentic. Slight, subtle difference. Assuming it is authentic, the first is a direct lie whereas the second is an honest statement referring to a second statement that may or may not be true.
Leaked material, by definition, need to be authentic documents. If they're not, it's not leaked material-it's falsified trash.
Is that when the plaintiff gets to be on top, or is it the other way around?
I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.
Despite what you may have learned on "It's a Wonderful Life," papa and mama dollar bills do not procreate and create baby dollar bills in safes.
Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
Personally, anyone with user ID over 13k is a nooblet.