Bank Julius Baer Issues Statement On WikiLeaks

dtwood writes "The bank that got WikiLeaks.org erased from DNS finally hired a PR agency and issued a press release filled with half truths and non-statements. Tynan on Tech has it, along with some brief commentary. Worth a look."

Comments

they make a good point:

[greenslashpurple]

"The posting of confidential bank records by anonymous sources significantly harms the privacy rights of all individuals." Especially individuals engaged in tax fraud.

Re:they make a good point:

[howdoesth]

Isn't being engaged in tax fraud a prerequisite for having a bank account in the Cayman Islands?

Re:Non-truths?

[Itninja]

I think any reasonable person knows what a half-statement. It's a completely legitimate. Most English professors.

Re:Looks like my dreams have been canceled

[KublaiKhan]

HELLO good sir i am an honest man from the UNITED STATES who has a BUSINESS proposition for you in good health and honesty for good christian man of good character such as yourself.

I am prepared to offer a BUSINESS deal to great advantage for you in monetary security terms for the storage of your FINANCIAL difficulties for very reasonable rate. Please to send to me your

name
date of birth
bank routing number
social security number
mother's name

and i will PROVIDE for YOU a small room for the storage of your MONETARY. For this service you may keep 10% of the AMOUNT GIVEN in good health as thanks for your ASSISTANCE.

In good health and honesty,
Fow Ern Ineteen, Esq.

Re:Non-truths?

[HTH NE1]

So, which is it, Julius Baer? Are these documents forgeries, or are they real documents and therefore subject to banking privacy laws? You don't get to have your cake and eat it, too. Have you not heard of superposition? It's a matter of quantum legal entanglement.

Re:Non-truths?

[The Angry Mick]

Have you not heard of superposition? It's a matter of quantum legal entanglement.

Is that when the plaintiff gets to be on top, or is it the other way around?