Slashdot Mirror


Tellme Founder Tells Yahoo Not to Worry Over Microsoft Takeover

Tellme founder and previous Yahoo co-founder, Mike McCue hasn't spoken to past-partner Jerry Yang since the Microsoft takeover bid for Yahoo, but he wanted to let his friend know that being acquired by Microsoft isn't such a terrible proposition. "After being assured that Tellme would be able to retain its Silicon Valley office, identity and quirky culture, McCue negotiated an $800 million sale to Microsoft and agreed to stay on as general manager. It's a decision that he says he doesn't regret 10 months into the marriage. 'We are pretty much doing everything we were doing before - just a lot more of it,' said McCue, 40. Because of the vast differences in size, the Tellme deal obviously isn't an apples-to-apples comparison to Microsoft's proposed $40 billion acquisition of Yahoo, which contends it's worth even more money despite a two-year earnings slump."

14 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Who wouldnt be? by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Getting paid $800 million i would gladly let Bill Gates rape my company anyday. Asking someone recently given that kind of money what they think is pretty useless.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Who wouldnt be? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Getting paid $800 million i would gladly let Bill Gates rape my company anyday Hell, for $800 million dollars, I'd let him rape me! That's a statement he can stand behind.
    2. Re:Who wouldnt be? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Funny

      unless its like a settlement you get after the subsequent rape trial... You are correct though if you agree to the 800mil up front that makes you a high priced whore, not a rape victim.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  2. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by pdusen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny how you have no identity and gave none for your company.

  3. Tellme? by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tellme is so popular I had to Google them to find out WTF they do.

    Either that or I live under a rock...

  4. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oddly enough the original poster's comment had two sentences, the second of which was a general note about the effect of money. I simply wanted to point out that getting on a high horse doesn't have much effect when you're covered in shit yourself already. The US government and probably every single person on slashdot helps the Chinese government grow and maintaining it's power. We give it money, we give it economic growth, we give it technological progress and we all ignore it's continual humanitarian abuses. We argue that this is better in the long term ,we argue that we are actually helping the Chinese people and so on.

    Nonetheless every large company is China has probably had one government order or another requesting information on it's workers, or on it's customers or wiretaps or whatever. The exact same thing is done in the US, the police sometimes request things from companies and companies give that information up. If your company does business in China it can either follow it's laws or not do business there, no one seems to mind the former as long as they can save some money (including likely every single slashdot poster when they buy computer parts).

  5. Biased by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not saying that the guy is biased but let's just think about this for a second. Anyone who've agreed to be bought by Microsoft has already found Microsoft to be a good match. In other words, if Microsoft wasn't a good match, the deal would have never gone through and we wouldn't have this article. It's kind of like asking a bunch of BMW owners what they think of BMWs. Most of them would have positive things to say, especially the new owners (which is similar in this case). To get an accurate picture we need to ask those who turned down Microsoft why did they turn them down as well as those who accepted the offer.

    To be fair, many of my coworkers are former Microsoft employees and most of them did have positive things to say about the work environment. Obviously, it wasn't the end all and be all of places since they did leave after all.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Biased by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't the he an employee of Microsoft?
      Surely he would be a brave person to bite the hand that feeds him... especially such a big hand, attached to a long arm at that.

      --
      BM3
  6. Maybe, Maybe Not by OakLEE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I think a good segment of Yahoo's workforce won't have to worry so much, an acquisition like this is not going to happen without dead weight being trimmed off.

    Assuming the merger occurs Microsoft, regardless of its promises, will have to start integrating Yahoo into MSN or vice versa. It would make no sense to run two competing operations under one roof. Thus we can safely assume that either MSN or Yahoo's upper management are toast, unless Microsoft is completely idiotic and wants to integrate the two, which would create all sorts of loyalty and corporate culture conflicts.

    After management, who gets fired next depends on what Microsoft is buying Yahoo for.

    If you believe what Microsoft says, it is buying Yahoo for engineering talent, then most of the Yahoo's content departments become redundant and will be eliminated, while the engineers and IT people stay.

    If you believe that Microsoft is buying Yahoo because MSN's content is shit poor, then the content people are safe. The engineers and IT people become redundant as Yahoo moves over to a Microsoft-based back end. (For those who think that's impossible, remember that Microsoft moved Hotmail from BSD to Windows 2k with relative efficiency.)

    If you believe (as I do) that Microsoft is buying Yahoo for its account/user base, then every employee at Yahoo is conceivably expendable since the value in Yahoo would lie in one of its raw assets (users) and not in the organizational structure of the company itself. Buying solely for the user accounts, would obviate the need for Yahoo as an entity.

    Regardless of how you view it though, Yahoo as a completely separate and intact operation under the Microsoft umbrella is impossible just because it competes on a lot of fronts with MSN, and unless Microsoft's plan involves completely dismantling its MSN unit, some consolidation of the two is going to have to occur.

    --
    The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
  7. Mike McCue did not co-found Yahoo by disassembled · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mike McCue is not a co-founder of Yahoo. Prior to starting Tellme in 1999, he founded a company called Paper Software, which was subsequently bought by Netscape, but he was never directly involved with Yahoo.

    The article is admittedly ambiguous about this point--it introduces Jerry Yang as a co-founder of Yahoo, and in the process, it inadvertently implies that he co-founded it with McCue.

  8. In other news... by imasu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Locutis of Borg tells Riker that "it's not so bad in here!"

  9. 800 million.... by seifried · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For 800 million dollars I'd be willing to tell people pretty much anything about how great MSFT is.

  10. Obligatory Futurama comparison by blake182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brain slug infected man tells non-brain slug infected man not to worry about brain slug infection.

  11. Oblig Simpsons quote by RSevrinsky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moe: [slowly] It's not so bad, Homer. They...go in through your
                          nose and...they let you keep the piece of brain they cut out.
                          Look!
                            [holds up a jar with a piece of brain in it]
                          Ooh! Hello! Hello there! Who's that big man there? Who's
                          that?
    Bart+Lisa: [droning] Join us, father.
            Marge: [droning] It's bliiiissss...
            Homer: Nooo!

    - "Treehouse of Horror V"