Slashdot Mirror


Cyber-Goggles Record and Identify Every Object You See

RemyBR writes "Researchers at the University of Tokyo have developed a smart video goggle system that records everything the wearer looks at, recognizes and assigns names to objects that appear in the video. Advanced programs then go back and create an easily searchable database of the recorded footage. Designed to function as a high-tech memory aid, these 'Cyber Goggles' promise to make the act of losing your keys a thing of the past, according to head researcher professor Tatsuya Harada. 'In a demonstration at the University of Tokyo last week, 60 everyday items -- including a potted begonia, CD, hammer and cellphone -- were programmed into the Cyber Goggle memory. As the demonstrator walked around the room viewing and recording the various objects, the names of the items appeared on the goggle screen. The demonstrator was then able to do a search for the various items and retrieve the corresponding video.'" Add in facial recognition technology and this would make for a great aid at conferences and family reunions.

108 comments

  1. as ass boobs by edittard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ass ass boobs ass ass car ass ass boobs OKG PANTIEZZ!!!!! ass ass boobs.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    1. Re:as ass boobs by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Awwww, man, you beat me to this!

      But think of the power! You could categorize the boobs by size, shape, exposed skin, ethnicity, tattoos...

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    2. Re:as ass boobs by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Might I suggest that you quit looking in the mirror, get out of Mom's basement and start an exercise program?

      Or

      Might I suggest you stop surfing porn?

      Or

      T'Pal is hot, isn't she?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:as ass boobs by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 4, Funny

      We regret to inform you that you have failed in your attempt to become a Chartered Lonely Geek. It's spelled "T'Pol". We hope that you will try again in the next exam period. -The Society of Desperate, Geeks, Dorks, Nerds and Associated Persons Desperate Enough to Have the Hots for a Fictional Character (TSDGDNAPDEHHFC)

      --
      FGD 135
    4. Re:as ass boobs by Psion · · Score: 4, Funny

      T'Pal never did much for me, personally. Not even the lead singer for the band.

      T'Pol, on the other hand ... I'd sure like to lick the paint off her ears.

    5. Re:as ass boobs by Aegis+Runestone · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see that a lot of women post here.

      --
      -Aegis Runestone-
    6. Re:as ass boobs by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny - I find myself reading that to the tune of BADGER BADGER

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  2. Vapourware! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ze goggles, zey do nossing.

  3. Oboe..oops *click* Obligatory by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new uhh...pardon me... *click*, *click* ah, yes..our new goggle-eyed...ummm...just a sec...*click*..overcome, no...*click*...overdon, no ..., *click*, *click* yes, overlords!
    Hey, where did everybody go?

  4. Are you sure about that? by The+Ancients · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Add in facial recognition technology and this would make for a great aid at conferences and family reunions.

    How would it recognise everyone's faces when they're all wearing the goggles?

    1. Re:Are you sure about that? by teh+moges · · Score: 2, Funny

      Highly secure RFID tags.

  5. Snow Crash by Aeonite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone in this overpass, somewhere, is bouncing a laser beam off Hiro's face. It's annoying. Without being too obvious about it, he changes his course slightly, wanders over to a point downwind of a trash fire that's burning in a steel drum. Now he's standing in the middle of a plume of diluted smoke that he can smell but can't quite see.

    But the next time the laser darts into his face, it scatters off a million tiny, ashy particulates and reveals itself as a pure geometric line in space, pointing straight back to its source.

    It's a gargoyle, standing in the dimness next to a shanty. Just in case he's not already conspicuous enough, he's wearing a suit. Hiro starts walking toward him. Gargoyles represent the embarrassing side of the Central Intelligence Corporation. Instead of using laptops, they wear their computers on their bodies, broken up into separate modules that hang on the waist, on the back, on the headset. They serve as human surveillance devices, recording everything that happens around them. Nothing looks stupider, these getups are the modern-day equivalent of the slide-rule scabbard or the calculator pouch on the belt, marking the user as belonging to a class that is at once above and far below human society. They are a boon to Hiro because they embody the worst stereotype of the CIC stringer. They draw all of the attention. The payoff for this self-imposed ostracism is that you can be in the Metaverse all the time, and gather intelligence all the time.

    The CIC brass can't stand these guys because they upload staggering quantities of useless information to the database, on the off chance that some of it will eventually be useful. It's like writing down the license number of every car you see on your way to work each morning, just in case one of them will be involved in a hit-and-run accident. Even the CIC database can only hold so much garbage. So, usually, these habitual gargoyles get kicked out of CIC before too long.

    This guy hasn't been kicked out yet. And to judge from the quality of his equipment -- which is very expensive -- he's been at it for a while. So he must be pretty good.

    1. Re:Snow Crash by RDW · · Score: 4, Informative

      'Those VL glasses. Virtual light...Friend of mine, he'd bring a pair home from the office where he worked. Landscape architects. Put 'em on, you go out walking, everything looks normal, but every plant you see, every tree, there's this little label hanging there, what its name is, Latin under that. . .'

      - William Gibson, _Virtual Light_

    2. Re:Snow Crash by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      also the ATHF episode with shakes stupid gigantic body suit/phone

    3. Re:Snow Crash by Mateo13 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of this book the moment I read the subject line. Awesome.

  6. Keep increasing that DB size by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    It's actually possible to do 3d object recognition in real time eh? 60 objects you say.. hmm, might need support for about 100 times that before use in an autonomous household robot. Some general recognition of categories might be needed too.. otherwise just my cutlery draw will max out 60 objects.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  7. Sounds vaguely familiar... by slimak · · Score: 2, Insightful
  8. Termovision by Dannkape · · Score: 1

    Now, just integrate the camera and screen directly into the glasses, and give me a Terminator style head-up display!

    Bonus for running ROM dumps of the Apple II O/S on the edges...

  9. Form factor? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    Will we all look like this when we wear these goggles?

    1. Re:Form factor? by Haeleth · · Score: 1
  10. Pointless project by Kazrath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you walked around in public with those things on you definitley would not have to worry about remembering ppl's names/faces as people would probably walk on the other side of the road to avoid you. Don't worry about remembering that girl's name/number because they were both fake also.

    Personally.. I think paying attention to what your doing and maybe not being constantly on a cell phone/Ipod would be more effective and less time consuming in remembering WTF you are/were doing.

    1. Re:Pointless project by Mantaar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Aw common, you're being a crank now. What's the point of this strange things, supposedly able to move all by themselves? They stink, they're slower than horses, and they're ugly, too! You'll never get laid if you ride such a thing, but think about riding a nice beautiful horse! Now that's what the ladies like!

      Seriously though, imagine we could get the size of that thing down. Substantially. Like, totally. There are several possibilities:
      a) implant to the retina. Make the goggles go away, wire it directly to the brain. Like Terminator's interface, only this one makes sense!
      b) get it down to a size where it would at least fit into glasses. What about making blind people 'recognize' what they can't see? All you need is some glasses with this technology and a bud in your ear that would tell you: 'street' or 'car, incoming, rapidly' or 'woman, age: mid-30, attractive, married'. OK, the system would need a great deal of sophistication for the latter...

      This project is all but pointless! You can enhance a human's possibilities, whether they're impaired (visually or otherwise) or not!

      --
      I'm an infovore...
    2. Re:Pointless project by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      So, maybe what they need are very regular-looking glasses with what appears to be a neckstrap but is actually a set of fibre-optic cables leading to a hidden processor and recorder.

    3. Re:Pointless project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Terminator's interface, only this one makes sense!

      Aw, wouldn't random assembly listings in your vision make your day more interesting? ;)

  11. I didn't even HAVE the goggles and kept seeing.. by davidsyes · · Score: 0

    Cyber-gOOgles...

    I almost thought this was an article about government spying on surfers...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  12. They need a Cowboy Bebop version by graveyhead · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's Edward's goggles! How cool is that, I totally want a pair :)

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  13. Time for the Google Goggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Google Goggles will identify everything you see, plus give you relevant ads while seeing them. "Mmm... burger... On sale now at McDonalds!"

    1. Re:Time for the Google Goggles by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Google Goggles
      Google Goggles
      We incept them
      We incept them
      One of ours
      One of ours

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Time for the Google Goggles by starsky51 · · Score: 1

      "Mmm... burger... On sale now at McDonalds!"
      Let's hope they're not quite that redundant!
      --
      There are 2 types of people in this world. Those who understand ternary and those who don't.
  14. ex girlfriends by timmarhy · · Score: 0

    i was going to say these would be handy for picking out ex's from the crowd, but then i realized this is slashdot and the chances of more then one female wanting to mate with any of you is remote.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:ex girlfriends by ORBAT · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're saying "any of you" like you're not registered here too.

    2. Re:ex girlfriends by Eric52902 · · Score: 1

      We need a +1 Zing! mod.

  15. Where am I? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Designed to function as a high-tech memory aid, these 'Cyber Goggles' promise to make the act of losing your keys a thing of the past. I just wish the goggle knows the whereabout of itself and whereabout of its owner.
  16. Go Little Brother! by jjh37997 · · Score: 0

    It's technology like this that is going to kick Big Brother right in the nads!

  17. Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this would be excellent tech to provide to Alzheimer's sufferers, as long as they could remember they had it! If they could program in people's names and play back the last few times they'd seen the person, do a quick review of what they did before they had their nap, review the route they took to where they currently are, etc. that would have a HUGE impact on Alzheimer's sufferers' lives.

    1. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Warll · · Score: 1

      "Where am I? and whats this silly thing hanging over my eyes?"

    2. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this would be excellent tech to provide to Alzheimer's sufferers, as long as they could remember they had it!
      And that would be the problem for some.

      Imagine yourself with Alzheimers. Imagine you used to be a sane, normal person - perhaps a little paranoid, because you worked in IT or security or some other field in which the knowledge that other people could be dicks was rubbed in your face day after day, or just from reading one newspaper too many.

      Now, imagine that part of your everyday environment is a little voice that whispers details to you about what you've supposedly done, people you've supposedly seen, things you don't remember. Or glowing words that appear in mid-air - "This is your son. His last visit was a week ago, and he brought your grandchildren". Only, you don't remember any of that - and that can't be your son, because he's five years old and that man was close to fifty. And it won't stop. You *do* remember that people who hear voices or see things get carted off to places far less pleasant than the one you're in, even though you don't quite know where *here* is, and keep your mouth shut.

      Perhaps things would be better if the person you used to be had trained themselves to accept direction better. Only, you don't know that's the problem because you've forgotten all that - and you were always more of a goat than a sheep anyway. So, you shut up out of self-preservation, go through the motions and pretend to recognise the strangers who show up bearing names of relatives. Only, that man who claims to be your son actually looks a little like your father. Could it be... your hands, they're old... you suddenly realise for a few seconds who you are and what you've become, and you break down into uncontrollable tears. Then, just as the man you claims to be your son calls for the nurse, it stops and you ask him "Who are you? What are we doing here?", just as you always do. The voice tells you that this is your son (only it can't be, your son is ten), and that you're home. You remember the voice - it's the only constant in your life, and you remember it lies, but you can't make it stop and you're too weak to do anything but go along with it. So, you nod along, pretend to know the people who show up ("Ah, he's a little better this week - no outbursts, and he seems to know everyone") and occasionally remember enough to want to pray for forgetfulness - and forget to be thankful when that prayer is answered.

    3. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it must be hard for you. But hey, at least your loss of coherence hasn't kept you off Slashdot.

    4. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Zidane-The-Dom · · Score: 1

      inspiringly good reading, Mr Roadkill

    5. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1

      Parent post needs to be modded +1, Terrifying.

    6. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philip K. Dick, is that you?

    7. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hm, I could also see this leading to a problem of really weak memory skills for people who use it. I mean, I'm used to having to remember little things constantly, and there's good support for the idea that the more you use your memory the better it gets. What would happen if people began relying on this stuff as much as they do on, say, phonebooks in their cell phones?

      When I was younger, I used to remember the phone numbers of dozens of people. Now, on a good day, I might be able to remember mine. Same thing for email addresses, URLs and so on.

      I suppose the problem of weak memory due to overuse could be solved by having the user practice various memory tasks in their down-time - people who'd use a device like this would probably be open to using it to shore up a faltering memory etc.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    8. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      It's been proven that people rely on technology to extend their memory (in fact use technology to do pretty much anything as a natural extension of their body). Instead of remembering everyones' phone numbers, you store them all in a device for the purpose and remember how to retrieve them. A persons' name gets cross-referenced in your mind with the information in the phonebook, and it all still works fine.

      Most people don't even realise. To them it's perfectly natural that their phonebook is their memory of peoples' phone numbers. From their (subconcious) point of view, it improves their memory because they never forget the phone number.

      On the other hand using their memory less means it gets weaker.

      If they often have to actually dial the number themself (instead of just selecting "call" on a phone with a phonebook built in), then they will start to remember it (their memory will essentially cache the phone number). For example, I buy stuff online so often that I have my debit card number, expiry and code memorised. :(

      Essentially in the modern age peoples' memories are relegated to remembering anything that they haven't yet written down, and acting as a cache for information they often look up.

      If you had a device that identified everything for you, you'd start to rely on the device for the names of things, and people, even those that you'd normally remember. You'd remember the names of people close to you, but not the name of someone that you met for the first time yesterday, or even this morning. Not that everyone can manage this already.

    9. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by WombatDeath · · Score: 1

      Good god, is there a Slashdot award for the most depressing post ever? I'm half inclined to go and kill everyone I like to spare them the possibility.

    10. Re:Sounds promising for Alzheimer's sufferers.... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      Good god, is there a Slashdot award for the most depressing post ever? I'm half inclined to go and kill everyone I like to spare them the possibility.
      The problem isn't so much with the tech itself, as with its application. I wrote that post from the assumption that a one-size-fits-all technological solution will be applied in some cases, and that it in some of those it will fail to help its "beneficiaries" in terrifying ways that aren't immediately apparant to their carers.

      Maybe in a couple of decades, once people are used to having head-up displays in their Ray-Bans and have come to rely on their PDA telling them where they met the person they're talking to right now, they'll have enough trust in the glowing golden letters and the whispered words. I'm sure there would be many people who would benefit from this kind of tech - people with mild dementia but who are perfectly mobile could be reminded by the voice to turn the bath water off, take out the garbage, feed the cat, get things ready for the meals-on-wheels lady and generally improve their quality-of-life and stay out of supported accomodation. Hell, truth be told, there are times when I'd probably find a little digital nagging in my ear or overlaid on reality to be helpful right now. I'm just worried that people will get Grandpa a "Voice" and assume that it will just make things better when in fact it's doing exactly the opposite.
  18. Terminator by Zephurus · · Score: 0

    Your clothes..give them to me.

  19. More brainrot by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    First the keyboards came for my handwriting, reducing it to a scrawl Then the speed dial came for number memory - I used to be able to memorize #s for friends and family, no more then the GPS came for spacial awareness. I just follow the voice now. Now they're coming for my other memories. Pretty soon I won't be able to recognize a begonia without help from a computer.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:More brainrot by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      What's a begonia?

      Hmm, I should google it...

  20. Memory aid or detriment? by Scotteh · · Score: 0

    As neat as this sounds, I believe it would damage one's ability to remember. With these goggles, the user will rely on it heavily and the memory will suffer from disuse just like any other skill.

  21. The goggles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do...something? Bet no one saw that coming.

  22. POV pr0n by martinX · · Score: 1
    Was I the only one to immediately think of POV pr0n?

    Object recognition now on... Shawna, kojak, Shawna, kojak, Shawna, kojak, Shawna, kojak, Shawna, kojak, Shawna, kojak, snow storm. All over Shawna.
    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  23. Transmetropolitan by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So apparently I fucked my editor's niece.

    Her name's Yelena Rossini. Anglo-Russian-Italian. Old Heath Road. Her family are so old money they're prehistoric-riche.

    I fucked my editor's niece and she says nothing happened. But I know it did. Because I'm clever.

    And because I left my shades on. And my shades' defence system thought all the falling down and rolling around and stuff was an assault.

    And what does it do when there's an assault? I'm glad you asked.

    It takes PICTURES.

    -- Spider Jerusalem, Transmetropolitan, 'Year of the Bastard'

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  24. lots of potential applications! by Tremegorn · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the Heads up displays in many RTS and RPG games, where you look at an object and it tells you what it is. I can see more advanced versions of this technology doing exactly that, having applications in almost every field, along with military use. And if the database was made large enough, the ability to look at literally anything and know instantly what it is, and is used for would be downright awesome.

    1. Re:lots of potential applications! by AgentPaper · · Score: 1

      Funny, my first thought was of the scan visor from the Metroid Prime series. All you'd need would be to build in a universal remote control, and you're good to go.

      Now, if they can just figure out how to stuff a 6' tall human into a 2' diameter armored beach-ball...

      --
      First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
  25. Paging Mr. Gibson... by StarEmperor · · Score: 1

    Paging Mr. Gibson, Mr. William Gibson....

  26. But can they... by jimforcy · · Score: 1

    ..but can they counteract the effects of beer goggles to keep slashdotters from taking home questionable members of the opposite sex on a Friday night?

    1. Re:But can they... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but they could probably stop you from screaming out the wrong name during an intimate moment with that questionable member of the opposite sex.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  27. PG-13 version by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1, Funny

    CowboyNeal, CowboyNeal, 3 Stooges, CowboyNeal, CowboyNeal, pizza delivery, CowboyNeal, CowboyNeal, 3 Stooges, OMG Marx Brothers!!!!! CowboyNeal, CowboyNeal, 3 Stooges.

  28. beer goggles by toby · · Score: 1

    Add in facial recognition technology and this would make for a great aid at conferences and family reunions.

    Not to mention nightclubs. Well I guess edittard nailed that already...

    --
    you had me at #!
  29. sounds iffy indeed by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've dabbled in object segmentation and recognition, and it's a bitch unless you cheat, e.g. by restricting yourself to pre-assigned objects, making sure your objects are always in high-contrast good-lighting conditions, or accepting lots of false negatives or positives. So I'm kind of doubting it will replace the ol' eye-brain recognition system.

    That said, I can see some useful related applications. Imagine a helicopter pilot doing search and rescue work. He sees something worth checking out -- say a tiny smoke plume -- and says "bingo." That's picked up by a computer, which is also monitoring his goggles, so it knows in what direction he's looking, and has done some very basic image analysis so it knows to ignore the canopy struts, Sun, shadows et cetera in the field of view. It then combines this with a GPS locator beacon and a good topo map, and instantly computes and records the exact location (latitude and longitude) of the sight of interest. Could save some lives.

    Or imagine an emergency worker on the ground during a big fire. He sees a worrying flare-up. Wearing the goggles, he can just say "Looks like trouble over there!" and the goggles, plus associated GPS device and computer, can instantly transmit to headquarters precisely where there is, even if the guy observing doesn't know himself.

    1. Re:sounds iffy indeed by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't happen to know of any good, accessible resources for somebody just getting into object recognition would you? So far I seem to have a knack for selecting the most obtuse references I can and it's starting to pick my pocket- any help would be much appreciated.

    2. Re:sounds iffy indeed by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that eventually there would be LOTS of pre-assigned objects: every user of this system could potentially contribute various iterations of any kind of object to a communal database. Eventually, with enough examples and some clever software, new objects of a given class could very easily be recognized.

      I believe someone's already using humans to sort photos right now - two humans will each view a picture on a web-site and both of them will write a caption the subject of it. Lots and lots of people caption the same image the same way and a database gets built up that's really quite good at figuring out what a given picture is of, and some decent analytical software could probably make excellent use of that database to look at new pictures.

      Actually, I can easily see a business model for this, once the hardware is cheap and unobtrusive enough... Google builds the infrastructure for aggregating and sifting through all the data. Users of the service agree that when they are in "public" spaces the data their device picks up will get sent to Google, but "private" spaces would not be sent back unless a user so chose. Then they offer various levels of service: "free" would supply relatively unobtrusive ads ("You've been looking at (whatever) for quite some time - if you're thinking about buying a (whatever), blink twice and a link of local suppliers will be sent to your phone.") to the user. "Paid" would be ad-free. "Premium" would cost a substantial amount, but perhaps offer special analytical services or access to paid databases.

      Honestly, I see this sort of analytical thing going on for all of our senses: something to evaluate the composition of air around you and can send an analysis to a display (we already have artificial noses); devices that constantly scan the sounds around us and could analyze them for known patterns/identify them ("That song you're hearing is Mmmbop - we suggest you evacuate the area immediately!"), pads worn on the finger-tips that would transmit to a display whatever you were running your fingertips over (nice for digitizing text - just zip your finger over it and it's in the system) and lots of other things.

      And yes, just to head off the obligatory responses, this could very much be used for enhanced porn. "You've been staring at that woman's ass for several minutes now. Google ShopAssist has ordered Astroglide and Kleenex to be sent to your mom's basement for later use."

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  30. Hmmmmm..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    These could come in handy..... Helping me remember who that chick that I keep waking up next to is.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  31. Cyber-googles by bandersnatch · · Score: 1

    Read the title as "cyber-googles" and got all worked up for nothing.

    Move on. Nothing to see here.

  32. Unfortunate web site name? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

    Did anyone else hesitate to clink on a link about Japanese researchers which has a domain name of "pinktentacle"?

    1. Re:Unfortunate web site name? by contraba55 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a bastion of credibility, myself...

  33. Virtual Light by Gumbytwo · · Score: 1

    Why isn't one of the tags for this article virtuallight?

  34. Star Trek Sensors? by cjb658 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good first step towards Star Trek-style sensors.

  35. Earth, by David Brin by bughunter · · Score: 1
    Crust: "Watching, all the time watching...goggle-eyed geeks. Soon as I get out, I'm going to Patagonia, buy it?

    ...And not so many barrel spoilers... rotten old apples that sit an' stink ... and stare atcha!"

    "Freon!" Crat cursed. "Just once I'd like to catch some goggle geek alone, with fritzed sensors and no come-go record, then I'd teach 'em it's not polite to stare!"

    ... "Oh it started as a way to fight street crime - retired people staking out the streets with video cameras and crude beepers. And the seniors' posse really worked...But after the crime rate plummetted, did that stop the paranoia?

    (h/t some Brin fanboys)

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  36. Nice lab coats by trickster721 · · Score: 1

    Check out the picture. Do Japanese scientists always dress like that when they're doing science, or was it just Cosplay Friday?

  37. Not really recording what you see.. by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't they be tracking your iris so they can see exactly what you are looking at rather then just the direction you are looking in?

  38. Feh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when they make goggles that let you see how ugly the chick is no matter how drunk you are!

  39. Even better... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Once we figure out that whole "gravity" thing, it should make things that much easier when we finally start having real-world katamari-rolling contests. Not only could the goggles tell you what your katamari consists of, they could also tell you how big the thing is relative to any objects contained within it... just like the game versions do now.

    Of course, I expect the first person to do it right will be a mad scientist type with a god complex. (Though, I have to admit, launching a ball of screaming brats the size of Texas would be something I'd probably pay to see, even if it wasn't coerced...)

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  40. Great, now if only by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    I had some cyber-contact lenses so I could remember where the hell I put my cyber-goggles.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  41. Where are all the Shadowrun Geeks?!? by Amilianna · · Score: 1

    Cyber-eyes anyone? I don't know whether to be happy to be the first to reference this or sad that no one else made the leap... Terminator would be cool, but the Shadowrun-style cyber-eyes would be way better.

    --
    "Does bouncing count?" - Silk, Magician's Gambit by David Eddings
  42. Hey! They work! by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1
    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  43. Facial recognition would be great! by jacquems · · Score: 1

    "... smart video goggle system that records everything the wearer looks at, recognizes and assigns names to objects that appear in the video. Advanced programs then go back and create an easily searchable database of the recorded footage."

    That pretty much describes how my memory works, except I usually remember things with all 5 senses, not just vision. When I need to find something, I close my eyes and call up the sensory data associated with the last time I saw it. Until recently, I thought that was just how everybody's memory worked. With these goggles, I guess it could be.

    "Add in facial recognition technology and this would make for a great aid at conferences and family reunions."

    The flip side for me is that I am terrible at putting faces with names. Even something as simple as my co-worker wearing a hat and overcoat caused me to fail to recognize him. I could really use something like this for matching people's names to their faces.

  44. ESP Game by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    I believe someone's already using humans to sort photos right now - two humans will each view a picture on a web-site and both of them will write a caption the subject of it. That would be the ESP Game:
    http://www.espgame.org/cgi-bin/login
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESP_Game
  45. Subpoenaed! by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    I sense the legal dogs of war drooling.

  46. AI and perceived beauty... by Dareth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scene: blind guy in a bar ( no not a tavern, this isn't D&D )

    AI Interface: Middle age woman, moderately attractive.
    blind guy: More details on attractive.
    AI Interface: Brown hair, blue eyes, medium build.
    blind guy: Is she a candidate for a romantic encounter?
    AI Interface: Calculated value for romantic encounter: "I'd do her!"
    blind guy: Are you calculating in my current blood alcohol level?
    AI Interface: Yes. Besides your blind, all she has to do is feel pretty.
    blind guy: Damn vicarious slashdot reading AI coders!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  47. Another 5 minute job.... by professorguy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    > new objects of a given class could very easily be recognized....


    Sure, by humans.

    When we talk of software, "very easily" is something a programmer hears when someone who has never programmed is talking.

  48. Everyday objects by Ninety-9 · · Score: 0

    Could you hand me the whatchamacallit?

  49. Re:I didn't even HAVE the goggles and kept seeing. by StarReaver · · Score: 0
    Your search - Girls that will date me - did not match any object in proximity.

    Suggestions:

    * Make sure object is in proximity
    * Stop posting on Slashdot
    * Move out of your parent's basement
    * Take off google-goggles so you don't look like such a dork

    Did you mean: Boys that will date me ?

  50. Read Cyber-Googles Record... by terrapinbear · · Score: 1

    ...at first, then realized that Cyber and Google are mutually exclusive terms.

  51. Too bad by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    This is the kind of far-out technology that WE should be working on, not waiting for other countries to develop it then jump on the me-too bandwagon. Unfortunately we're too busy worrying about patent infringement and letting archaic beliefs get in the way of real scientific and technological progress.

    Kudos to the Japanese for working on these things. I just wish we were frontrunners ourselves.

  52. Use brains :) by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Good to see some progress finally being made after all these decades. Been waiting for this sort of stuff and _more_ for quite a _while_.

    Given that the tech for reading brain patterns is getting more and more viable ( http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/114843/game-on-with-the-braincontrolled-pc.html ), all you need to do is get a computer to associate thought macros with the pictures (and audio) the computer and you are getting at the same time.

    Why try replacing the brain with computers to do perception etc? Augment it[1].

    1) Your brain is good at perception and recognition.
    2) Computers are fairly good at retrieval and retention.

    So what you need is to train yourself to semi-automatically "label" "important" stuff with identifiable enough brain patterns/thought macros.

    Recognition: you look at stuff, and you might rapidly think "YYY,Picture=Ball,ZZZ" (replace YYY with whatever unique thought macro you choose to tell the computer you're thinking to it, and ZZZ = done").

    Retrieval: you could think "Ball", and the computer could show stuff (starting with candidates in a likely context) and you could think "Nope" and then it cycles rapidly (playback) till your brain goes "Yep!" - which would be quite quick after some practice.

    If you can't really remember the exact tag, you could try via time ("recent past", etc), or other contexts.

    Oh yeah, once you have that thought macro thingy, and add wireless networking, you could think "lights on" and your computer could do it for you - virtual telekinesis (I tried to get the ICANN etc to reserve a .here TLD to make it easier to do DNS location of stuff by physical context - http://jukebox.here/ would be a different jukebox in different places, but the ICANN obviously had better things to do like allow domain tasting, and .info, also tried writing an internet draft but it never became and RFC oh well)

    You could also do some virtual telepathy - think of something, retrieve it, share it with someone.

    And that's why I think copyright is a big barrier to progress - such pervasive recording and sharing will upset the RIAA etc.

    They will want more than a penny for your thoughts, and they'll think those thoughts belong to them too .

    And you might be forced to have DRM in your ebrain/iBrain or whatever.

    I suggest we better fix that copyright and patent crap now :).

    [1] I also suggest that there are differences between replacing the brain with AI stuff, and augmenting the brain with AI stuff. One might think they seem the same, but the philosophy and goal is different. The long term end result might be the difference between who is the rider and who is the horse.

    --
  53. As if webpages weren't getting bad enough. by professorguy · · Score: 1
    OK, so now the database is getting pretty big and it can now name almost everything you look at. So I walk through an airplane terminal looking for my boss and the goggles label everything they recognize: "Planter, escalator, linoleum, courtesy phone, shoes, window, roof truss, coffee cup, wristwatch, suitcase, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc....


    Oh yeah, this is going to help me tremendously. Now instead of having to try to pick out my boss from all those other passengers, I have to try to pick him out from all the labels blocking my view.

  54. GM or Ford uses a system like this... by paulgrant · · Score: 1

    for identifying car parts for production. its very well developed. you look through the goggles and it tells your part number based on analysis if the image.

  55. The most useful application I can see for these... by abqaussie · · Score: 1

    Is training software to recognize objects, or using them for AI verification, to improve AI for robots. Have a simple validation method, button or voice prompt, tied to the recognition that lets it learn, wear them around for a few months and watch your AI system grow exponentially "smarter." Or at least better trained. Once you have a system that agrees with the average human's perception of their environment, your robot's got it made.

  56. Privacy Laws by Benjamin_Wright · · Score: 1

    Cybernetic systems like these goggles will raise interesting legal issues. The goggles can record audio. But in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan, it is often illegal to record voice conversations without the prior consent of all parties.

    --
    Benjamin Wright, Dallas, Texas, benjaminwright.us