Dealing With a GPL Violation?
Sortova writes "For many years now I've been maintaining OpenNMS, a free and open source network management framework published under the GPL. A couple of years ago it came to our attention that a company called Cittio was using OpenNMS as part of their proprietary and commercial network management application. I talked with Jamie Lerner, the Cittio founder, and he assured me that Cittio was abiding by the GPL. However, we were recently contacted by a potential client who was also considering Cittio's Watchtower, and it appears that they are not disclosing that they are using GPL'd code or at least not in the clear and concise fashion required by the GPL, including the offer of source code for all of the code they are including and any changes being made to that code. Since the copyright for OpenNMS is held by a number of commercial companies, the Software Freedom Law Center is not able to help us defend or even investigate a potential violation. I was curious if anyone here on Slashdot had experienced anything similar or has any advice?"
The RIAA doesn't know that their lawyers are looking for jobs on Slashdot. :P
1. Write GPL software
/. is going to do your case more harm than good.
2. Discover GPL software license has been violated
3. Post all over slashdot asking legal advice
4. Whine about why no lawyer will touch your case with a barge pole
5. ????
6. Profit
If you're in a situation that might need a lawyer, contact one. Asking for help on
These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
Sony has just released second generation device,Mylo-2, both Mylo-1 and Mylo-2 are Linux based and locked tight. Where are the kernel sources? GPLed userland sources? Nobody seems to notice or nobody cares.
Please read the entire thread before posting.
How we know is more important than what we know.
Medical matters belong in the hands of God. Most gods I talk to, their first bit of advice is "pray and do what I say."
Do you see the problem with that statement?