Slashdot Mirror


OLPC Mesh Networking Tester Explains How It Works

An anonymous reader writes "James Cameron is an engineer working on the OLPC project, specifically testing the wireless network capabilities of the OLPC XO laptop. Cameron lives in a small town called Tooraweenah in a remote region of the Australian outback. There is little noise in the spectrum in the area, so it's perfect for testing the wireless networking capabilities of the XO as it mirrors the kind of rural, spacious environment the XO is intended to be deployed in. Cameron breaks down exactly how the OLPC XO's mesh networking works, including the cheap US$35 solar powered mesh nodes that can be mounted on top of a tree to further the network's reach. Testing in the Australian outback, Cameron discovered that the range of the XO could go up to 1.6km 'quite easily' at 1.5m above ground. 'Assuming a range of 1.6km holds true, (the mathematical formula for area of a circle) Pi R squared tells us one well placed mesh node will cover up to eight square kilometers.' The article also includes numerous pictures of the mesh nodes and testing of the XO."

18 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. Better Reviews by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found this review to be logical and informative and therefore boring. So I decided to let a few key individuals weigh in on this and tell us exactly how this mesh network works.

    Senator Ted Stevens: "This here larptop isn't an intersection for trucks to just ... DRIVE over, no, it's a junction for that internet and also your own personal internets. See, just the other day, I got on this here thing and it sent out what I call a "searcher tube" looking for other laptops ... up to 1.5 km away. That's right, once a searcher tube finds another larptop or 'junction tube' then it connects to that and the series of tubes continues to grow. Unfortunately, this series of searcher tubes and junction tubes makes it highly probable that my messages get backed up in those tubes. Therefore, this will provide an own personal internet for poor children in countries we either need to invade or ignore but it will not, however, suffice for bridging islands in Alaska."

    The Reverend Billy Graham: "And lo, I did with God's good graces ask for power to be restored and replenished throughout the XO's motherboard thereby bringing the only free BIOS to life ... and it was good! Upon God's recognition of my authentication of that which you call "the login screen" a hand descended from the heavens. This hand stretched 3 km end to end and it was then clear to me then that this hand was intended not for me ... not for the rich ... not for the privileged but for the poor and pathetic chillun' of the world that need God's help. Now I have a method by which to contact them and teach them about God and ask them for weekly tithes! And when I realized that a TCP/IP connection had been made, I fell down on my knees and prayed to the Lord God for He is Good and Holy and brings life to these innate objects you call the XO laptop, Amen."

    Bob Dylan: "Yeah, ok so like, I got this laptop and it was pretty groovy but I had to put my Mac down because it was like I couldn't use two laptops at once ... so anyway the laptop like wanted to be alive so I hit the power switch, man, and then it was like *wham* *whiz* *whazzle* and suddenly like the thing could 'talk' to other things like 1.5 km away and I wasn't sure if it was the uppers I had just taken or if I really was connectin' to another machine or network that far away.

    Mitch Bainwol: "We have discovered that a new technology exists that is a threat to your safety & the economy and will further destroy our income in the near future. It allows criminals, drugs users and child molesters to contact each other freely and unmonitored up to 1.5 km away. They can trade ... no steal music at their leisure from a vast expanse of 1.5 km. They may already be using these laptops to steal your diamonds and moneys. Putting an XO laptop into your child's hands is only a gateway to crime and an early death. It's cheap price makes it easy to manufacture and distribute, we are here to warn you about the looming threat of a solid network of these devices stretching out across our free country. Thousands of children in other countries have received them already and their quality of life has plummeted. These laptops are sturdy and brightly colored, they are easily identifiable. Find people that have them and report them to the RIAA."

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Better Reviews by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bill Gates "The Microsoft MOLPC device embraces, enhances and extends the basic principles and standards already developed to afford the user a greater, more secure and trusted computing environment. When connected to the grid network, the MOLPC device interfaces with the local Exchange server (one per community) in order to provide a local communications hub. A local proxy server (one per community) affords secure, cached Internet access, further enhanced by the use of our specially modified MOLPC browser, user certificate and licensing programme. A community Licence Server (CLS) will ensure that all connected users are protected from non-genuine software and our hi-performance HotMesh2 network includes additional, proprietary protocol layers to ensure that unauthorised users operating with standard TCP/IP-based technologies cannot access the bandwidth. The required MOLPC hardware and software licences will be available from mobile vendors who will tour towns and communities on a scheduled basis in a Microsoft Jeep. Due to the additional security benefits and other enhancements we have added to the original OLPC framework for our MOLPC, some third party equipment may not have the processing power or software technology to operate over the MOLPC grid, but we feel that our approach offers superior returns..er..to the users. There is no truth in the rumour that MOLPC stands for Multiple Operating Licences Per Child."

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  2. Skynet? by Serenissima · · Score: 4, Funny

    James Cameron is working on computer networking technology? I think we see where this is going...

    --
    Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  3. What's the deal? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody says "Pi R squared", but pi are round. Cake are square.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:What's the deal? by Stanistani · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no. Pie ain't square, cornbreads is square.

      Yew ain't from aroun' here, are ya? *cocks shotgun*

  4. What kind of QA is this? by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 3, Funny

    Testing in the Australian outback, Cameron discovered that the range of the XO could go up to 1.6km 'quite easily' at 1.5m above ground. 'Assuming a range of 1.6km holds true, (the mathematical formula for area of a circle) Pi R squared tells us one well placed mesh node will cover up to eight square kilometers.' Test data should be extrapolated from to assist in promoting fear and despondency among project managers, not validating requirements. Please hand in your testing card at the next available opportunity and go and work in marketing where you belong.
    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
  5. Why not release schematics and other info? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be a boon to those of us that are maintaining a community wifi setup. Instead of having to spend a LOT on each node we could easily set up hundreds of these cheap $35.00 repeaters to give users the ability to have wireless throughout the town or city. right now I have dish antennas linking sites and having to buy other gear to get things working for the community Wifi. if I could spend as little as $120.00 per site for a repeater+solar panel+battery and simply get them installed all over the place within range of each other it would be dramatically easier for me. I can put up an unobtrusive box+panel easier than getting permission to put up this box and dish, oh the dish needs to be high up in the air and visible... etc...

    They really need to release the whole shebang to the world so that windows drivers can be written to use that mode, linux and OSX drivers would be great too, plus get people making the repeaters better stronger and cheaper.

    did I miss the links? do they release all the details of this so It can be implemented commercially?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Why not release schematics and other info? by legutierr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The OLPC wiki is very extensive and growing, and is a great starting-point for making contact with the core OLPC team (including senior management at OLPC, who are surprisingly accessible). If there isn't an article specifically addressing a person's questions, the wiki at least provides a place where questions can be posted with a reasonable expectation of getting an answer. In addition, there are instructions on how to join OLPC mailing lists and IRC, where you can communicate directly with the team.

      Nevertheless, I will say that much of what is on the wiki is oriented to software or organization building, and that info on OLPC hardware seems to get the short-shrift. There is a *short* article discussing the wireless repeater here, which links to the manufacturer's page here. I'm sure that contributions to the wiki in this area would be appreciated.

  6. The ugly truth about mesh networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In a wireless mesh network, 99.9% of which are implemented using half-duplex transceivers, once past your immediately adjacent nodes, for each additional hop away you halve the bandwidth and double the latency. No way around that, and in a large area mesh (think muni wifi here) you must re-insert an additional backbone feed about every 4 to 8 hops into the mesh either by landline or by point-to-point wireless bridges, else performance across the mesh gets abysmally poor, very quickly.

    Dense meshes just don't work very well, they implode upon themselves. Very sparse meshes, such as used in the battlefield by our military, of perhaps in remote areas like the Aussie Outback as mentioned in the FA, are ideal applications of a wireless mesh network, but all the folks who think they can make a successful commercial venture with a wireless mesh in a dense urban or suburban environment are in for a rude awakening if they drink too much of the Koolaid hype that many of the consumer-grade hardware vendors are trying to push.

  7. open mesh by qw0ntum · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who want to build their own mesh, check out the open-source ROBIN project. They are building a complete plug-and-play mesh networking package. they are even configured to automatically connect to the Open Mesh Dashboard so you can manage your network. Open Mesh will start selling pre-flashed nodes this week at their site.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  8. We Need Good Mesh Networking by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm been slightly interested in mesh add hock wireless networking for a while now. I'd like to see some combination of wireless access point in Wifi & WiMax with some sort of Bittorrent management / bridging function. If you could put this in a box like what OpenWRT runs on and sell it for less that 100 it would be great. Living in a college town I'm convinced those kids are sharing petabytes of Porn, Pop & House music, and cheesy serial television shows from Hollywood. Having all that sharing pushed off the wired net I pay my ISP for on to a wireless grey market mesh network would free the wired network up... for my *legitimate* traffic of Blues & Classical music, and David Attenborough documentaries... then perhaps I could finish seeding my fair share of "Life in Cold Blood".

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  9. and in the real world? by westlake · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This would be a boon to those of us that are maintaining a community wifi setup.

    To test in the Australian outback sounds like a test under ideal conditions. No RFI. No natural or man-made obstructions. No problems with climate or weather.

    Maintaining "hundreds repeaters" through a Buffalo winter presents a somewhat greater challenge.

  10. Re:The ugly truth about mesh networks by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bottom line - OLPC network mesh software is pre-alpha.

    Just because the OLPC is designed to use the entire WiFi band for its mesh network *does not* imply that it's not a mature design, just that it wasn't designed to co-exist with other WiFi networks on the same band.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  11. Bwhahahahaha...dream on by monkeyboythom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are new to life in general, aren't ya? Didn't anyone tell you that humanity, as a collective, is a lazy and sheep-like group? The autonomous consumer telco is the urban fantasy that is right up there with growing your own vegetables, weaving/sewing your own clothes, and "living off the grid."

    Sure, there are examples of people doing just that, but how many others are there that simply want to live without the "hassle" of being self sufficient.

    A no or low cost Autonomous consumer owned telecommunication infrastructure is what will evolve out of this. No more cable, internet, or cell phone bills.
  12. The beauty of mesh networks by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude. Mesh is not for synchronous communication. Centralized, synchronous services like WWW just aren't going to happen on mesh.

    What can happen is something a synchronous like Usenet or E-mail. You could even supplement the existing network with vehicle-mounted hot points. Postal trucks, mobile health clinics, bookmobiles, and other services make the rounds regularly. No reason why they can't spool or relay messages at each stop.

    Besides, centralized services like WWW are too easy to censor. Mesh can help drive a new round of freedom of communication, if it can steer clear of proprietary codecs and formats entirely.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  13. Re:The ugly truth about mesh networks by Agripa · · Score: 4, Informative

    I will lose my membership for not knowing this, but aren't there 11 channels (not sure how many non-overlapping channels though). How can 4 machines DoS every wifi channel when they aren't even doing anything!


    In the US, the 2.4 GHz ISM band has 11 channels spaced 5 MHz apart. 802.11b and 802.11g require 25 MHz of separation to prevent interferance which limits the non overlapping channels to 1, 6, and 11. 802.11n and many 802.11g systems support double channel widths of 40 MHz which limits the 2.4 GHz ISM band to just one non overlapping channel.

    The 5.0 GHz band used for 802.11a and for some 802.11n radios has 19 20 MHz channels alleviating much of the congestion problem at the expense of cost and using a higher frequency.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels
  14. Re:The ugly truth about mesh networks by jeffstar · · Score: 2, Informative

    In fact the rate at which latency increases and bandwidth decreases in a mesh network has been shown to be 1.68^N where N is the number of hops (Piyush Gupta, Robert Gray, P.R. Kumar An Experimental Law for Ad Hoc Networks, May 2001). I have measured this myself in an 8 hop half duplex wireless network.

    That is only for data being sent straight through the mesh. When clients connect directly to the mesh nodes on the same radio that is used for sending and receiving mesh traffic then there is even less radio time to go around and things slow down even more.

    There is a company called Mesh Dynamics which sells mesh nodes with three radios: one for send, one for receive and another for clients to connect to.

    I recall they have modified or extended in some way the linux kernel to have one radio dedicated for sending and another for receiving. This is something I am interested in doing as well but haven't seen any kernel modules or extensions to allow it thus far.

  15. Horrible design! by Radi-0-head · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The boxes for the mesh radios are BLACK! Totally stupid decision, as they do not reflect sunlight and allow the guts of the box to heat up to levels which will either degrade performance or cause the radios to malfunction completely.

    How do I know this? Let's just say I've learned from personal experience.