Slashdot Mirror


Psychologist Beating Math Nerds in Race to Netflix Prize

s1d writes "An almost-anonymous British psychologist named Gavin Potter has suddenly risen to the top of the Netflix prize charts. With his very first attempt, he got a score which took the BellKor team seven months to reach. Currently at a score of 8.07, he has only five teams ahead of him now in the race for the ultimate Netflix algorithm. 'Potter says his anonymity is mostly accidental. He started that way and didn't come out into the open until after Wired found him. "I guess I didn't think it was worth putting up a link until I had got somewhere," he says, adding that he'd been seriously posting under the name of his venture capital and consulting firm, Mathematical Capital, for two months before launching "Just a guy." When he started competing, he posted to his blog: "Decided to take the Netflix Prize seriously. Looks kind of fun. Not sure where I will get to as I am not an academic or a mathematician. However, being an unemployed psychologist I do have a bit of time."'"

9 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Beating everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    5th place is not winning. Are you guys Ron Paul supporters too?

    1. Re:Beating everyone? by rcw-home · · Score: 4, Funny

      Welcome to your therapy session.

      Well, before everyone gets all in a tizzy,

      Surely not everyone?

      let me just say that I'm already on the case to return the favor.

      Can you elaborate on that?

      As a mathematician and computer scientist, I'm working on a computer program using some pretty heavy-lifting math to allow people to psychoanalyze themselves.

      Why do you mention computers?

      I call it the ELIte analyZing mAchine, or ELIZA for short.

      Why do you mention computers?

      How does that make you feel, Mr. Psychologist Person?

      Does that question interest you?

  2. Re:Psychologist? by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't just come barging in here with your fancy facts and logical arguments. You'll ruin the whole conversation that way! And we don't take kindly to strangers in these parts...

  3. Re:Psychologist? by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alternatively: It's a bit hard to argue with you when you keep making sense.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  4. Re:Domain Knowledge by wasted · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a strong social obligation to love sex, just like there's a strong social obligation to hate work. A lot of people love their work and couldn't be bothered wasting their time on mating rituals.. then all the brainless breeders call them "losers" because they've made two choices that fly in the face of social pressure.

    Like they really had a choice...
  5. Re:Psychologist? by poena.dare · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew user 3799, and let me tell you, user 3800 is no user 3799.

  6. WWLD? (What would leonardo do?) by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could the emergence interdisciplinary experts lead to another 'renaissance' of sorts?

    Oh, I don't know. If only we had a art history & statistics dual major to figure it out...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  7. Re:What's the point? by besalope · · Score: 5, Funny

    Right. Unless it's your brother that was robbed, your mother's house that burned, your life savings tied up in the boat that sank, your cow that was run down, or your new neighbor's rabid dog that needs killing. Meh, that just sounds like the making of a country music hit.
  8. Almost anonymous? by robhiller · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one that finds the phrase 'An almost-anonymous British psychologist named Gavin Potter' faintly ridiculous?