Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhiker's Guide Turns 30

XaN-ASMoDi writes "Yesterday saw the 30th anniversary of the very first broadcast of Douglas Adam's seminal work, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy", to mark this, Mark Vernon has written an article for the BBC News Magazine on the answer to The Question. 'It's 30 years since Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy made its debut on BBC radio, but its most famous mystery is still waiting to be resolved...'"

9 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. The proper way to celibrate by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Raise a pan galactic gargle blaster to the late Douglas Adams for 30 years of bizarre geek humor.

    1. Re:The proper way to celibrate by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's more than just geek humor.

      Adams didn't just poke fun at his characters, he wrote with a real sympathy for them. Well, just look at the man, he was a person who cared about things like the extinction of bizarre species that the vast majority of humanity has never heard of, much less seen for themselves. Empathy. That's the secret of reaching the apex of funniness. When the reader in his imagination steps into a character's shoes, he takes the metaphorical pies in the face personally.

      Adams wrote as if the way the universe is mattered.

      He also wrote as if the way the universe is happens to be funny.

      The fact that the way things are both matters and is funny isn't exactly funny itself. Or rather it's very funny, and it's very something else, which there isn't a perfect word for. To capture that something else, you'd have to write a bunch of books.

      Which is just what Douglas Adams did.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. Re:Maybe my memory's failing me... by Jim+Hall · · Score: 5, Informative

    That was the Question that came out of Arthur's brain, when pulling random letters from the Scrabble tile bag in pre-historic Earth. But as Ford and Arthur pointed out just before they did so, Arthur escaped from the Earth just before his planet was destroyed. So whatever comes out probably won't be the correct Question, but it should be close.

    And in fact, 6 x 7 = 42, so 6 x 9 was off by 2. :-)

  3. Re:Rubbish article by rucs_hack · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, Douglas himself wrote a lot of the stuff for the Movie. He invented the new character Humma Kavula as well.

    In fact if you read much of his stuff, including interviews (I have everything its possible to get in audio form), you learn that he definitely did not want the movie to be a copy of either the book or the radio series. Actually it never could be a copy of the radio series, because there were all sorts of problems over what Douglas had the right to use.

    It's not fashionable to like the H2G2 movie, but I enjoyed it hugely. Had it been an exact rehash of the same old stuff I'd have been annoyed. I wanted to not know what was going on for as much of the film as possible. Casting Mos Def as Ford Prefect was an inspired move, he performed the role really well. I'm not so sure about Sam Rockwell as Zaphod, but we can't have everything.

    And Marvin? Well he was amazing. I never did understand why such an advanced robot should look like the one in the tv series. The one in the movie was much closer to my mental image of the robot then I expected.

  4. And the question is: by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 5, Interesting
  5. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently not. In a BBC article celebrating 30 years of Hitchhikers, they report that Adams apparently refuted that suggestion:

    I don't write jokes in base 13. Well, maybe the true meaning of that sentence wasn't that he didn't use base 13, but that he didn't mean it as joke ...
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  6. My theory... by itsdapead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is that Adams was referring to the pivotal clause #42 of the official rules for the game Mornington Crescent (using the pre-Livingstone concordance, obviously, since Adams was writing in 1978) - which also explains the significance of Fenchurch Street Station in the later books. Regular listeners to BBC Radio 4 (on which the original radio versions of HHGTTG were broadcast) will immediately grasp how following this philosophy allows the follower to confidently navigate the complexities and contradictions of life - but slashdotters from the USA and elsewhere may need to look it up.

    Of course, it could be that Adams was merely satirising humanity's strange obsession with seeking simplistic answers without actually understanding the question - but that seems unlikely considering the masses of evidence for a deeper numerological significance.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  7. Re:It's not the ultimate meaning... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was in middle school I devised a rule set for determining the most "random"* number between 0 and 100. The guiding principle was that it had to be a number with no obvious significance. Any number with a strong popular "meaning" was out, so no 13, 52, 69. It couldn't be particularly large or small, so anything less than 10 or greater than 90 was out. Multiples of 10 were out, as were their immediate neighbors. So were numbers halfway between multiples of 10. Or numbers in the 50s or 60s (too close to the overall midpoint). Even numbers (and digits) were insufficiently odd, and composite numbers in general seemed a little too derivative. This left only two qualifying numbers, and 73 was too close to 3/4 for my tastes. So I concluded that 37 is the most "random" number.

    And no, it's not part of my ATM PIN. :)

    *Note: I said "random" not random. I know there's a difference.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  8. Adams *did* reveal the "secret" behind 42 by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTA:

    Douglas Adams never revealed the secret of number 42 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.douglas-adams/msg/d1064f7b27808692
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!