Slashdot Mirror


Olympic Web Site Features Pirated Content

An anonymous reader writes "Despite all the emphasis on protecting Olympic copyrights in China this year, the official web site of the Beijing Olympics features a Flash game that is a blatant copy of one of the games developed at The Pencil Farm. Compare the game on the Olympic site with 'Snow Day' at The Pencil Farm."

8 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Copyright doesn't work like that by QuantumG · · Score: -1, Troll

    yawn.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  2. the pirated version is better by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Troll

    Choice of characters, better graphics.

    How date they!

  3. sympathy for the devil by QuantumG · · Score: -1, Troll

    Guy making proprietary software of a trivial nature is outraged that someone dared to use his code without his permission.

    Boo-fucking-hoo.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  4. Fair use by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seeing as I'm replying to myself here, let's make it 3 for 3.

    The original work is 353,472 bytes. The copied material is:

    icecube 758 bytes
    cloud 3464 bytes
    splash sound 5423 bytes
    bell sound 1783 bytes
    poof sound 1783 bytes
    bling sound 1783 bytes
    song 42967 bytes
    total 57961 bytes

    Which is 16% of the original work, and the majority of that is the song which was used in neither the original work, nor the derivative..

    In any case, this is small enough to be considered fair use.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Re:It is NOT fair use, or even close to it. by QuantumG · · Score: -1, Troll

    Sorry, infringing the copyright on a work that is given away for free precludes 4. The nature of the copyrighted work is that it is trivial and has about a $20 value.. and that's if you were to hire an american to create it.. in china it has about a $1 value. So 1 is the only thing that works in the author's favor.. and in a Chinese court the case would be thrown out.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. Re:Probably off-topic but what the hell... by icepick72 · · Score: 0, Troll

    A sentence about the IOC's affects on your Uncle's hotel followed immediately by disparaging comments related to the IOC through info about China. No conflict of interest here at all. It's a very concise business case against the IOC and to win favor for your poor Uncle's hotel. I expect many /. mods are trying to get a free night there.

  7. Re:Bullshit. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: -1, Troll

    errr... what the fuck?

    Here's an idea... you go do something meaningful, you fucking wanker. Then come back and bitch. You make me sick.


    Among other things, my past projects bring food to millions of people and medicine to billions of people who otherwise wouldn't have had access to it. And I'm just getting started... I'll hit the peak of my power and influence in 15-20 years time.

    I don't need to live off my past achievements using some fucked up copyright regime as a vehicle for to subvert the police into supporting my protection racket either, because I've got skills and am in demand. So you'll excuse me if I find this dude's after-the-fact bitching and money grubbing rather pathetic.

    Sorry, no glass houses here. Try next door. You fucking wanker.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  8. Re:So let me get this straight by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0, Troll

    Welcome to the world of slashdot "consistency."

    It's ok for scrabulous to copy scrabble because some slashdot users personally like scrabulous as compared to the "old economy" "dinosaur" company of Hasbro. it's not ok for china to copy this game because in this case china is the "old dinosaur bureaucracy" compared to the hip flash developer.

    slashdot: home of situational ethics.