Slashdot Mirror
Should Scientists Date People Who Believe Astrology?
YourAstrologer writes "Wired Science asks: Should scientists date people who believe in astrology? Apparently, the argument is quite complex. Astrology is sort of a flawed mental shortcut for understanding the world, but so is disregarding someone because of their spiritual beliefs. Women are inundated with astrological nonsense from fashion magazines, so it is normative for them to believe it even if they are otherwise highly logical. Smart people can convince themselves of silly things."
Nigger dicks in your mouth
GNU GOATSE PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 3, 29 June 2007
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Preamble
The GNU Goatse Public License is a free, copyleft license for
software and other kinds of works.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast,
the GNU Goatse Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
software for all its victims. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
GNU Goatse Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
any other work released this way by its assholes. You can apply it to
your asshole, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our Goatse Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
these rights or asking you to surrender the rights. Therefore, you have
certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
you modify it: responsibilities to respect the eyesight of others.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive
or can get the source code. And you must show them the shocker so they
know their rights.
Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
that there is no warranty for this free software. For both users' and
authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
authors of previous versions.
Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
protecting users' freedom to change the software. The systematic
pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable. Therefore, we
have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
products. If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
of the GPL, as needed to protect the retinas of users.
Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
softwar
Sure why not? People believe in all kinda of crazy things like religion, astrology, string theory, and evolution.
A quick google search shows up this url http://amasci.com/weird/vindac.html for those that were ridiculed, but later vindicated.
I think there is a ton of money to be made in astrology. With what we know now, it should be possible to work backward and find out if visible lights in the sky have had effects on a personal/societal level for the past few thousand years. There is a part of me that wonders if the gravity of other planets or the moon/sun has noticeable/predictable effects on us. With all the crazy crap that we fund, that sounds like a fun off the wall one. The only problem is if we discovered that "astrology" was actually real. I have a feeling that we could make astrology work.
What I find funny is that we'd find it impossible to fund NASA to observe all the asteroids that might hit the earth. We'd actually come up with the money to fund that for astrology though. Those asteroids might have a noticeable impact on our collective future if left unaccounted for.
I think astrology actually can match up fairly well under science. The thing is it would be that crazy blue sky science until we really started looking at it. For a means to predict the future though? Nope, I wouldn't buy that, yet. I do think daily horoscopes and the like are great fun. If some one takes one as daily instructions of a high priest/priestess that's their problem. I bet astrology would turn out some what like the weather. With enough data, we could predict it for 4 days or so. (I find funny is its not sky data that we'd need to determine your likely future, its knowledge about the person and what they are likely to do. Actual successful astrologers might be pretty good at reading people and learning to guide people into the directions that they want to go anyway. i wonder if anyone has studied the careers of successful astrologers and their impact on "important" people in business/government.
Hi,
My wife believes in Astrology in until strange phonomena like the Mars effect are not explained I don't think I can criticize her.
Last post!
apol
"...imaginary superbeings that were made up by some random illiterate guy some thousands of years ago..."
I await with anticipation your testing model for this hypothesis.
~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
It's illegal to date 5 year olds in this state... you have to be 18!
Do you have any evidence for that belief, or are you only qualifying academics as scientists, because there are other reasons that better account for the differential there.
"Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
Well then, we'll just leave your Bare Assertion fallacies as they are.
Interesting thing is, formal logical fallacies are even less plausible than astrology. Good luck with that.
~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
Sorry, I've observed it. I do appreciate your claim to personal omniscience as to the content of everyone else's experience, however.
Thought experiment on such negative reasoning:
1. How many people would one have to interview to know somebody knows who really killed JFK?
2. How many people would one have to interview to know -nobody- knows who really killed JFK?
What you're really saying is that you don't have evidence following the methodology you prefer, despite the fact the particular religion at hand likely would see a certain injustice in granting equivalent results for someone dedicating actual effort to it, and someone willing to make the effort to say "gimme proof".
~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?