Tivo On Board With YouTube's New API
impuLsive writes "YouTube has announced they're rolling out a brand new API. The API will allow you to integrate YouTube into a website, allowing for features like: uploading videos, adding and editing video metadata, fetching localized feeds, custom queries, and a customized player UI with controlled video playback. Alongside YouTube, TiVo announced that they will be supporting the site's content via the Series3 and TiVo HD DVRs starting later this year."
those conversations at work that start out "did you see show_xyz last night?"
Television is about to get more customizable, whether you believe this is a good thing or not, if YouTube makes itself available to anyone that can plug in a box like a Tivo, well that means joe six pack will watch more YouTube.
Wonder what the response of the MPAA and others related will be? Outlaw YouTube on television screens?
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
I wonder if Apple will put this functionality into Front Row? It seems like a natural extension to what is already on offer.
The Mothership
The remaining question is, do you have the skills to do this fast enough, and do you work cheap enough, for it to take less than $400 of your time?
Don't get me wrong, I'd do it regardless -- although VideoDownloader is absolutely NOT what you want to be doing from your couch; I'd look for whatever API they gave the iPhone and just stream h.264.
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
I received a TiVoHD unit for the holidays, and while it has some interesting features, I'm continually frustrated at the nickel-and-dime tactics of TiVo. People often don't realize that TiVo, while still charging a fee for the unit and a monthly service fee, still has advertisements laced into it. The subscriber agreement allows TiVo corp to activate even more intrusive ads if they so chose to. And the "added features" on the box, especially PC-related features, often require paying for TiVo's upgraded computer software to do anything but the basics. And then there's the DRM and non-anonymous statistics reporting.
What concerns me is that TiVo is that these new "features" are just going to end up as more annoying ad clutter, and at every menu option will be a prompt to pay for some new feature. Just like so many other devices spawned of the communication age.
TiVo corp has yet to turn a profit, so I'm sure they're just looking for more revenue streams. I'm sure the latest software update will be just what I'm waiting for.
"No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
Or the skills to do it at all. I'm definitely a geek, but I'm a mechanical engineer... while I physically built my computer, I've just never delved into Linux based systems. I just don't program anything, and rarely have the time to start from scratch. But TiVo has pissed me off enough to the point where I think I'd rather have spent the extra time to have something I have full control over, let alone not having to pay a monthly fee to use.
"No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
The only thing that remains are issues of "quality" that one gets from expensive productions (crane shots, long tracking shots, fancy lighting tricks, quality make up, good direction and acting). So, the funding would have to come from somewhere - the economic model would have to work - but if it is settled either through fees for DL or subscriptions or whatever, then basically two things happen: the broadcaster business model is mortally wounded and the advertisers that support it will have a harder time keeping eyeballs...
This youtube / tivo thing is a harbinger of the future of TV, and is a BIG step in the right direction.
RS
Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
Dude, the Series 3 is discontinued. It's replacement, the Tivo HD, is about 2-fiddy. And it does a bit more than just play YouTube videos.
Where do you live?
If you're employed in tech in the US and not making $400 or more for 2-3 days of work, there's a decent chance you're doing something wrong. $16-$25/hr is not particularly special, it's entry to mid-level pay depending on exactly where you are (in the San Francisco Bay area, it's not even "mid-level").
As for "spare time" having no monetary value, that's pretty absurd. For some people, it may be effectively true (though I'd argue most such people have the financial sense of a rock), but for others, the monetary value of your time is whatever you can get for it.
A second job, side consulting, or even researching investment strategies are all ways to monetize time not spent working at a "primary" job. The question is not "Does my spare time have value?", it's "How do I wish to extract the value of my spare time?". The answer to that question depends on the answer to other questions, like (simplistically) "Is the money I could get from working two extra hours per day worth more to me than time spent relaxing?".
If you prefer to use your spare time to goof off, that's fine. Nobody can make the right decision for you. But thinking that time outside of a 40-hour-a-week job has no value is pretty silly.
Yay!
I'll be able to watch over-compressed, out of focus home videos at 320x200 blown up to 1920x1200 on my HDTV!