$5 Per Month Fee Proposed For Legal Music P2P
sneakyimp writes "Both Wired and Ars Technica have reports on Jim Griffin's proposal that ISPs charge each broadband customer $5 per month to subsidize the ailing music industry. The resulting fund would ostensibly 'compensate songwriters, performers, publishers and music labels.'
Although no specific version of the proposal has been referenced, a number of controversies are inherent to the plan: How is the money really divided? What happens when the MPAA, the Business Software Alliance, and various other industry groups want their own surcharge added? What about the supposed majority of broadband customers who never download illegal music? Griffin discussed the plan further at SXSW . We've previously discussed a similar proposal from the Songwriters Association of Canada.
We would need much larger tubes.
The sports rebroadcasting fee, to compensate sports networks for their broadcasts that you retransmit
:-)
The politicians opponents fee, to compensate them for money that you don't give to their campaigns
The tapped powergrid fee, because you might tap into the power grid at some point
The Emperor's club fee, because you might use the services of an illegal prostitution ring and not get caught (and not be the governor of a large state).
What? You don't do any of these things? Then why should you pay for it? Instead, you should pay a fee to ME, for no particular reason, other than I think you should give me your money whether I've given you anything in return or not!
I'm gonna head on over to the pirate bay and download shit right now, just to piss you off.
With nanomachines on the horizon, it won't be more than 50 years till you will have access to a formulator capable of replicating a car
Make mine a flying car.
"Kittens give Morbo gas!"
I don't think Britney's celebrity status has a whole lot to do with how much she gets screwed.
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.