Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

BattleBots Delayed, Will Go Brains Over Babes

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on from the more-engineering-the-better dept.

An anonymous reader writes "We got all excited earlier this week about robo-combat returning to TV with ESPN, but now PopMech super geek Erik Sofge talks to the folks at BattleBots and finds out that because of so many early entries, the competition will be delayed until at least November. The reason? Gone are the babes and predictable wedge fights, in are eager engineering students, a crazy ramp arena and lots of new rules. Worth the wait, or do we miss the Comedy Central version?"

4 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Robots? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pah. The first (and last) time I watched one of these "battle bots" programmes, I was left thinking "where are the robots". All I saw was (somewhat dangerous) remote controlled toys.

    When your battle bot can battle even somewhat autonomously, then I'll watch.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:Robots? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When your battle bot can battle even somewhat autonomously, then I'll watch.

      We're not even close to being able to have an AI that would be able to adapt to a new opponent with a new weapon system or form of motion. We've been able to make decent autonomous robots that operate in a strictly controlled environment where they can be programmed to expect everything that can happen -- e.g. robots that play soccer, now toss a football at one, or make the floor like a mogul ski slope, and see what it does. Heck, a lot of AIs go completely mental when faced with unknown stimulus.

      So given the practical realities of AI today, you'd essentially have to get rid of all the engineering and design aspects of the robots, and basically have a standard robot so that you could make the necessary assumptions about what enemies it would face. Not that this kind of thing isn't interesting -- I always loved programming crobots which had only one robot with standard abilities. It's just that practically speaking you have to choose between software engineering and hardware engineering, and at this point I just think unique human-controlled fighting machines is more exciting.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  2. Well, being a geek... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... it's the bots that turn me on, so I'm not sure I understand what the loss would be.

    (seriously though, I think focusing on the main content instead of "babes" will give the show much better longevity -- while Kari Byron can be pretty in MythBusters, that's not the main reason to why I watch that show)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. First one suffered from faux excitement by SendBot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember being SO excited for the BB premiere and being totally disappointed at how lame it felt to actually watch it. It was all WWE-style hyperactive and the announcers were just annoying as hell and wouldn't shut up with their inane drivel. I remember one bot had a cheesy head thing mounted on it and they went NUTS when it got knocked off, even though it was just a superficial piece and in no way connected to function of the actual robot.

    Sounds like they're taking the right approach this time!